postmortem
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run a blameless postmortem / incident review — timeline, impact, root cause analysis, and corrective actions. Use when the user says "postmortem", "incident review", "RCA", "root cause analysis", "what happened with the outage", or wants to turn an incident into a structured, blameless writeup with preventive actions.
44 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mehboobali98/rmine-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- SethGammon/Citadeltheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- flonat/flonat-researchtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- jp-solumhealth/jpstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- MakiDevelop/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use hypothesis-driven-debugging, organize and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Sturla22Skillhypothesis-driven-debugging
Debug by ranking concrete hypotheses and running discriminating checks. Use when a bug is hard to localize, many plausible failure points exist, logs are noisy or misleading, a symptom appears intermittently, or trial-and-error edits haven't worked.
Also in 3 projects that use this
seongjaeryuSkillorganize
Organize knowledge into Sets
Also in 3 projects that use this
SaluteYBSkillskill-eval
Evaluate, tune, and regression-check AgentSkills. Use when creating a new skill or improving an existing one and you need structured should-trigger, should-not-trigger, boundary-case, and execution-quality examples. Also use when auditing overlapping skills and sharpening trigger descriptions before release.
Also in 3 projects that use this
neurofooSkillpremortem
Pre-mortem analysis that imagines a plan has failed, then works backward to identify causes and preventions. Use before launches, major decisions, or risky initiatives to surface hidden risks.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillincident-response
Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillthreat-model
Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions44 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 44
- dotnet/fsharp★ 4.3ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- boshu2/agentops★ 453same name
- flonat/flonat-research★ 150same name
- neurofoo/agent-skills★ 111same name
- Dimon94/dverity★ 107same name
- Dimon94/skills★ 107same name
- EthanReedLabs/sulde★ 99same name
- Hongyu-yu/matsci-ai-skills★ 19same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
34 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- capacity-planningSkill
- decision-logSkill
- dependency-mappingSkill
- escalationSkill
- estimation-sizingSkill
- exec-summarySkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- okr-trackingSkill
- prd-reviewSkill
- program-health-dashboardSkill
- project-charterSkill
- raid-logSkill
- release-notesSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- roadmap-planningSkill
- sprint-planningSkill
- stakeholder-comms-planSkill
- status-reportSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 40 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
After an outage, regression, data issue, security event, or significant miss.
- Distinctive: line 19
Root cause, not first cause: Use the 5 Whys / contributing-factors analysis to get past the proximate trigger.
- Very specific: line 28
Write a summary: what happened, impact (users/duration/scope), severity.
- Distinctive: line 55
Keep tone neutral and factual throughout.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 40 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Postmortem (Blameless Incident Review)
Turn an incident into learning and prevention — focused on systems and process, never on blaming individuals.
When to use
- After an outage, regression, data issue, security event, or significant miss.
For sprint/project reflection (not incidents) use retrospective.
Principles
- Blameless. Assume everyone acted reasonably with the information they had. Fix systems, not people. Replace "X made a mistake" with "the system allowed X to happen."
- Facts first. Build the timeline from evidence (logs, alerts, messages) before drawing conclusions.
- Root cause, not first cause. Use the 5 Whys / contributing-factors analysis to get past the proximate trigger.
- Actions must prevent recurrence, be owned, and be dated.
Inputs to gather
- What happened, when detected, when resolved; severity and who/what was impacted.
- The timeline of events and the response.
- Logs/notes if available.
Process
- Write a summary: what happened, impact (users/duration/scope), severity.
- Build a timeline (UTC or stated TZ): detection → diagnosis → mitigation → resolution. Note time-to-detect and time-to-resolve.
- Analyze root cause(s) and contributing factors (5 Whys).
- Note what went well and what made it worse (detection gaps, slow rollback, unclear ownership).
- Define corrective actions: preventive + detective, each with owner, due date, priority.
- Capture lessons learned.
Output format
# Postmortem — {{incident}} · {{date}}
**Severity:** {{SEV}} · **Impact:** {{users/scope/duration}} · **Status:** Resolved
## Summary
{{2–4 sentences}}
## Timeline
| Time | Event |
## Root cause & contributing factors
{{5 Whys / analysis}}
## What went well / what went poorly
- ...
## Action items
| Action | Type (prevent/detect) | Owner | Due | Priority |Keep tone neutral and factual throughout.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

