analyze-gibbs-convergence
Skill167 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Interpret Gibbs energy minimization convergence metrics, analyze Jacobian
In this repository140 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- analyze-convergenceSkill
- book-creationSkill
- design-flash-benchmarkSkill
- design-reactor-benchmarkSkill
- figure-discussionSkill
- generate-publication-figuresSkill
- journal-formattingSkill
- neqsim-acid-gas-treatingSkill
- neqsim-advanced-control-mpc-and-virtual-sensingSkill
- neqsim-agent-handoffSkill
- neqsim-agentic-process-optimizationSkill
- neqsim-api-patternsSkill
- neqsim-autonomous-investigationSkill
- neqsim-capability-mapSkill
- neqsim-capacity-and-utilization-analysisSkill
- neqsim-capacity-increase-screeningSkill
- neqsim-ccs-hydrogenSkill
- neqsim-code-healthSkill
- neqsim-code-hygieneSkill
- neqsim-code-reviewSkill
- neqsim-column-internals-and-rate-basedSkill
- neqsim-compressor-antisurge-recycleSkill
- neqsim-consequence-analysisSkill
- neqsim-continuous-task-improvementSkill
- neqsim-controllability-operabilitySkill
- neqsim-cooling-waterSkill
- neqsim-cpa-water-boundariesSkill
- neqsim-depressurization-mdmtSkill
- neqsim-distillation-designSkill
- neqsim-document-intelligence-extractionSkill
- neqsim-dynamic-equipment-implementationSkill
- neqsim-dynamic-simulationSkill
- neqsim-electrolyte-systemsSkill
- neqsim-emulsion-separationSkill
- neqsim-energy-systems-and-electrificationSkill
- neqsim-engineering-design-packageSkill
- neqsim-eos-regressionSkill
- neqsim-equipment-cost-estimationSkill
- neqsim-exploration-strategy-selectionSkill
- neqsim-field-developmentSkill
- neqsim-field-economicsSkill
- neqsim-firewater-deluge-designSkill
- neqsim-flow-accelerated-corrosionSkill
- neqsim-flow-assuranceSkill
- neqsim-flow-assurance-study-reportSkill
- neqsim-forward-separator-trainSkill
- neqsim-future-operation-studySkill
- neqsim-hazid-fmea-eta-ftaSkill
- neqsim-heat-integrationSkill
- neqsim-hydrogen-productionSkill
- neqsim-input-validationSkill
- neqsim-integrated-production-and-lifecycleSkill
- neqsim-in-writingSkill
- neqsim-java8-rulesSkill
- neqsim-jurisdiction-regulatory-basisSkill
- neqsim-literature-searchSkill
- neqsim-lng-liquefactionSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
After running Gibbs reactor benchmark experiments
- Distinctive: line 18
When analyzing convergence of Newton-Raphson Gibbs minimization
- Distinctive: line 19
When comparing solver variants (baseline vs optimized)
- Distinctive: line 20
When investigating failure cases in chemical equilibrium
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: Analyze Gibbs Convergence
Purpose
Interpret Gibbs energy minimization convergence metrics, analyze Jacobian conditioning, verify element balance closure, and produce publication-quality figures for chemical equilibrium papers.
When to Use
- After running Gibbs reactor benchmark experiments
- When analyzing convergence of Newton-Raphson Gibbs minimization
- When comparing solver variants (baseline vs optimized)
- When investigating failure cases in chemical equilibrium
Analysis Procedure
Step 1: Load and Parse Results
import json
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def load_reactor_results(results_dir, solver_name):
"""Load JSONL results into DataFrame."""
records = []
with open(f"{results_dir}/raw/{solver_name}_results.jsonl") as f:
for line in f:
records.append(json.loads(line))
return pd.DataFrame(records)Step 2: Equilibrium Composition vs Temperature
The most important figure for a chemical equilibrium paper:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def plot_equilibrium_composition(df, system_name, save_path):
"""Plot equilibrium mole fractions vs temperature for all species."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 7))
species = [col for col in df.columns if col.startswith("n_")]
for species_col in species:
name = species_col.replace("n_", "")
ax.semilogy(df["T_K"] - 273.15, df[species_col],
label=name, linewidth=2)
ax.set_xlabel("Temperature (°C)", fontsize=12)
ax.set_ylabel("Equilibrium mole fraction", fontsize=12)
ax.set_title(f"Chemical Equilibrium — {system_name}", fontsize=14)
ax.legend(loc="best", fontsize=10)
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
ax.set_ylim(bottom=1e-12)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()Step 3: Convergence Iteration Analysis
def plot_iteration_heatmap(df, save_path):
"""Heatmap of iteration count in T-P space."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 7))
pivot = df.pivot_table(values="iterations", index="P_bara",
columns="T_K", aggfunc="mean")
im = ax.pcolormesh(pivot.columns - 273.15, pivot.index,
pivot.values, cmap="YlOrRd", shading="auto")
plt.colorbar(im, ax=ax, label="Iterations")
ax.set_xlabel("Temperature (°C)")
ax.set_ylabel("Pressure (bara)")
ax.set_title("Newton Iteration Count")
ax.set_yscale("log")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()Step 4: Element Balance Verification
Critical for validating Gibbs reactor correctness:
def verify_element_balance(feed_composition, product_composition,
element_matrix):
"""Verify element conservation.
element_matrix: dict mapping element -> {species: count}
Example: {"H": {"H2S": 2, "H2O": 2, "H2": 2}, "S": {"H2S": 1, "S8": 8}}
"""
results = {}
for element, species_counts in element_matrix.items():
feed_total = sum(feed_composition.get(sp, 0) * count
for sp, count in species_counts.items())
prod_total = sum(product_composition.get(sp, 0) * count
for sp, count in species_counts.items())
if feed_total > 0:
rel_error = abs(feed_total - prod_total) / feed_total
else:
rel_error = 0.0 if prod_total == 0 else float("inf")
results[element] = {
"feed": feed_total,
"product": prod_total,
"relative_error": rel_error
}
return results
def plot_element_balance_closure(df, save_path):
"""Plot element balance errors across all cases."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 6))
elements = [col for col in df.columns if col.startswith("elem_err_")]
for col in elements:
elem_name = col.replace("elem_err_", "").upper()
errors = df[col].replace(0, 1e-16) # avoid log(0)
ax.semilogy(range(len(errors)), sorted(errors),
label=elem_name, linewidth=2)
ax.axhline(y=1e-10, color="red", linestyle="--",
alpha=0.5, label="Target (1e-10)")
ax.set_xlabel("Case index (sorted)")
ax.set_ylabel("Relative element balance error")
ax.set_title("Element Balance Closure")
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()Step 5: Jacobian Condition Number Analysis
def plot_jacobian_conditioning(df, save_path):
"""Analyze Jacobian conditioning across conditions."""
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(14, 6))
# Condition number vs temperature
ax = axes[0]
ax.scatter(df["T_K"] - 273.15, df["jacobian_cond_number"],
c=df["iterations"], cmap="viridis", alpha=0.5, s=20)
ax.set_xlabel("Temperature (°C)")
ax.set_ylabel("log₁₀(Condition Number)")
ax.set_title("Jacobian Conditioning vs Temperature")
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Condition number vs iterations
ax = axes[1]
ax.scatter(df["jacobian_cond_number"], df["iterations"],
alpha=0.3, s=20)
ax.set_xlabel("log₁₀(Condition Number)")
ax.set_ylabel("Iterations to Convergence")
ax.set_title("Conditioning vs Convergence Speed")
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()Step 6: Adiabatic vs Isothermal Comparison
def plot_adiabatic_vs_isothermal(df_iso, df_adi, save_path):
"""Compare equilibrium outcomes between modes."""
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 2, figsize=(14, 6))
# Temperature change in adiabatic mode
ax = axes[0]
dT = df_adi["outlet_T_K"] - df_adi["T_K"]
ax.scatter(df_adi["T_K"] - 273.15, dT, alpha=0.5, s=20)
ax.axhline(y=0, color="black", linestyle="-", alpha=0.3)
ax.set_xlabel("Feed Temperature (°C)")
ax.set_ylabel("ΔT (K)")
ax.set_title("Adiabatic Temperature Change")
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
# Iteration comparison
ax = axes[1]
ax.scatter(df_iso["iterations"], df_adi["iterations"], alpha=0.3, s=20)
max_iter = max(df_iso["iterations"].max(), df_adi["iterations"].max())
ax.plot([0, max_iter], [0, max_iter], "k--", alpha=0.5)
ax.set_xlabel("Isothermal Iterations")
ax.set_ylabel("Adiabatic Iterations")
ax.set_title("Iteration Cost: Adiabatic vs Isothermal")
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
ax.set_aspect("equal")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()Step 7: Trace Species Behavior
def plot_trace_species(df, species_list, save_path):
"""Show how trace species evolve with temperature on log scale."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 7))
for species in species_list:
col = f"n_{species}"
if col in df.columns:
vals = df[col].replace(0, np.nan)
ax.semilogy(df["T_K"] - 273.15, vals,
label=species, linewidth=2, marker="o", markersize=3)
ax.set_xlabel("Temperature (°C)")
ax.set_ylabel("Equilibrium moles")
ax.set_title("Trace Species at Chemical Equilibrium")
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()Step 8: Validation Against Reference Data
def plot_validation_parity(neqsim_results, reference_results,
species_name, save_path):
"""Parity plot: NeqSim vs reference (NASA CEA, JANAF, etc.)."""
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(7, 7))
ax.scatter(reference_results, neqsim_results, s=40, alpha=0.7,
edgecolors="black", linewidths=0.5)
# Diagonal
lims = [min(min(reference_results), min(neqsim_results)),
max(max(reference_results), max(neqsim_results))]
ax.plot(lims, lims, "k-", alpha=0.5, label="Perfect agreement")
# ±10% bands
ax.plot(lims, [l * 1.1 for l in lims], "r--", alpha=0.3, label="±10%")
ax.plot(lims, [l * 0.9 for l in lims], "r--", alpha=0.3)
ax.set_xlabel(f"Reference {species_name}")
ax.set_ylabel(f"Calculated {species_name}")
ax.set_title(f"Validation: {species_name}")
ax.legend()
ax.grid(True, alpha=0.3)
ax.set_aspect("equal")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(save_path, dpi=300, bbox_inches="tight")
plt.close()Figure Catalog for Gibbs Reactor Papers
| Figure | Shows | Section |
| Equilibrium composition vs T | Species distribution at equilibrium | Results |
| Iteration heatmap (T-P) | Where solver works hard | Results |
| Element balance closure | Conservation law verification | Validation |
| Jacobian conditioning | Numerical stability | Discussion |
| Adiabatic vs isothermal | Mode comparison | Results |
| Trace species | Low-abundance species behavior | Results |
| Parity plot vs reference | Accuracy validation | Validation |
| Convergence history | Residual vs iteration for selected cases | Methods/Discussion |
Table Catalog
| Table | Shows | Section |
| Reaction systems tested | Feed, products, conditions | Methods |
| Convergence summary | Rate, iterations, timing by system | Results |
| Element balance summary | Max error per element per system | Validation |
| Reference comparison | AAD% vs NASA CEA / JANAF | Validation |
| Solver variant comparison | If comparing solver settings | Results |
Key Validation Criteria
For a Gibbs reactor paper to be credible:
- Element balance: Relative error < 1e-10 for ALL elements in ALL cases
- Gibbs energy: Total G strictly decreases (or unchanged) each iteration
- Reference agreement: AAD < 5% vs NASA CEA for major species at equilibrium
- Trace species: Non-negative mole numbers (no unphysical negative values)
- Mass balance: |mass_in - mass_out| / mass_in < 1e-10
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

