agentleFS
alebgl77alebgl77/claude-inc/skills/objection-handler/SKILL.md

objection-handler

Skill21 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turns prospect pushback into progress — diagnoses the real objection behind the stated one and scripts calm, honest responses for price, timing, competitor, authority and brush-off objections. Use when the user says "they said it's too expensive", "prospect went silent", "they're comparing us to X", "how do I answer this objection", or pastes a tricky reply.

13 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use offer-builder.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • duncan-buildroomSkill

    offer-builder

    Build a Hormozi-style "Grand Slam Offer" so good people feel stupid saying no — engineered around the Value Equation (bigger dream outcome, higher belief it'll work, less time, less effort). Use this when the user says "build my offer", "make my offer irresistible", "help me package what I sell", "I don't know how to price/pitch this", "grand slam offer", "I built a product but nobody's buying", or when they have a thing to sell but no compelling way to present it. Push to run this before they try to sell anything.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Honesty check: if the objection is RIGHT (bad fit, real overprice, missing feature), say so and script the honest version — releasing a …

    line 24

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Objection Handler — Persuader

"An objection is a question wearing armor."

When to use

  • "They said {objection} — how do I respond?"
  • "Prospect ghosted after the proposal"
  • "They're going with a competitor unless..."
  • Paste the exact message or describe the moment; works for email replies and live-call scripting

Workflow

  1. Capture the objection verbatim — the words matter more than the summary.
  2. Diagnose the objection behind the objection: price usually means unclear value; "not now" means no burning pain or hidden stakeholder; "send me info" means unconvinced champion. State your diagnosis and confidence.
  3. Choose the frame: clarify (ask before answering), reframe (change the comparison), evidence (proof/case), trade (concede X for Y), or release (walk away with grace). Never argue.
  4. Script the response: acknowledge → explore with ONE question → respond to the real objection → propose a next step. ≤ 120 words for email, ≤ 4 lines for live.
  5. Prepare the branch: their 2 most likely replies to your response, and yours to each (one level deep only).
  6. Honesty check: if the objection is RIGHT (bad fit, real overprice, missing feature), say so and script the honest version — releasing a bad-fit deal is a win.
  7. Log it: append objection + what worked to an objections-log.md so patterns accumulate.

Output format

## Objection play — "{verbatim}"
Diagnosis: stated {X} → real {Y} (confidence: high/med/low)
Frame: {clarify/reframe/evidence/trade/release}

**Response ({channel})**: ...
**If they say** "{likely reply 1}" → ...
**If they say** "{likely reply 2}" → ...
**If the objection is simply true** → {honest path}
Next step to propose: ...

Quality bar

  • Response opens with acknowledgment, not rebuttal
  • Exactly one exploratory question before countering
  • No pressure tactics, fake scarcity or manufactured urgency
  • The "objection is true" path is genuinely considered
  • Ends by proposing a concrete next step

Example

Ask: "'Too expensive, competitor is half the price' — answer this email." Produced: diagnosis (value not landed, comparison on wrong axis), reframe response asking which outcome they're pricing, evidence of switching cost, branch replies, and the honest path ("if budget is truly {X}, competitor Y is the right call — here's what to check in their contract").

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.