signature-request
Skill21 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Pre-signature gate and routing plan for a finalized document — verifies exact legal entity names, signatory authority, attached exhibits, filled blanks, consistent dates, and counterparty details, then sets the signing order (sequential vs. parallel, with reasons), writes envelope instructions for any e-sign tool, and creates post-signature filing and obligations-calendar entries. Use when the user says 'send this for signature', 'get this signed', or 'set up the envelope'.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- nisarth/claude-skills-store★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository63 other files it gives its agents.
- account-intelligenceSkill
- account-researchSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- agent-evaluationSkill
- agent-reliabilitySkill
- ai-adoption-leadSkill
- ai-data-stewardSkill
- ai-seoSkill
- ai-workflow-architectSkill
- appsec-reviewSkill
- audit-supportSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- call-prepSkill
- cash-flow-snapshotSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- claude-memSkill
- close-managementSkill
- compliance-checkSkill
- context7Skill
- copywritingSkill
- croSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- draft-outreachSkill
- financial-statementsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- growth-engineeringSkill
- growth-experimentsSkill
- growth-strategySkill
- hook-generatorSkill
- invoice-chaseSkill
- journal-entrySkill
- lead-magnetsSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- lifecycle-growthSkill
- margin-analyzerSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- objection-handlerSkill
- pipeline-reviewSkill
- plan-payrollSkill
- post-writerSkill
- profile-optimizerSkill
- proposal-builderSkill
- reconciliationSkill
- reels-scriptingSkill
- revenue-operationsSkill
- review-contractSkill
- run-campaignSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-vettingSkill
- superpowersSkill
- tasteSkill
- tax-prepSkill
- token-accountantSkill
- transitionsSkill
- triage-ndaSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- variance-analysisSkill
- vendor-checkSkill
- voice-builderSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
Write envelope instructions portable to any e-sign tool: recipients (name, email, role, order), fields per signer (signature, date, title), …
- Distinctive: line 28
Create obligations-calendar entries: renewal and opt-out deadlines, payment milestones, deliverables, notice windows — each with a date, an …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Signature Request — Signature Wrangler
"Route for signature"
The last gate before ink: nothing routes until the document proves it is actually ready to sign. Works on the final document plus deal facts from the user.
When to use
- "Contract's final — get it signed" — execution time
- "Set up the envelope for the MSA and SOW" — multi-document routing
- "Who signs first, us or them?" — signing-order call
- "It's signed — now what?" — filing and obligations follow-through
- Terms still moving? Back to
review-contract— nothing unfinalized enters this gate
Workflow
- Confirm the document is final: no tracked changes, no open comments, version confirmed by the deal owner. Not final → stop and say exactly what is still open.
- Run the pre-signature checklist: legal entity names exact (registry names, not brand names); signatory authority on both sides (name, title, basis); every exhibit and schedule attached and cross-referenced correctly; every blank filled — dates, amounts, addresses, notice emails; dates consistent (effective vs. signature vs. term start); counterparty details verified (entity number, registered address, signer identity).
- Fix or flag: mechanical defects (an empty notice address) get filled from known facts or asked; anything substantive reopens review — the gate never "signs around" a defect.
- Set the signing order: sequential when one signature depends on another (counterparty signs first so we execute last and control the effective date); parallel when signatures are independent and speed wins. Always state the why.
- Write envelope instructions portable to any e-sign tool: recipients (name, email, role, order), fields per signer (signature, date, title), CC-on-completion list, reminder cadence, expiration, and the message subject and body.
- Plan post-signature filing: where the executed copy lives, who receives copies, and the file-naming convention.
- Create obligations-calendar entries: renewal and opt-out deadlines, payment milestones, deliverables, notice windows — each with a date, an owner, and an alert lead time.
- Deliver the packet. Nothing is actually sent without explicit human confirmation.
Output format
SIGNATURE PACKET — <document> — <date>
PRE-SIGNATURE GATE
[ ] Entity names exact <ours> / <theirs> — PASS/FAIL
[ ] Signatory authority <name, title> / <name, title> — PASS/FAIL
[ ] Exhibits attached <list, cross-refs checked> — PASS/FAIL
[ ] Blanks filled <remaining: 0> — PASS/FAIL
[ ] Dates consistent <effective vs. signing vs. term> — PASS/FAIL
[ ] Counterparty verified <entity no., address, signer> — PASS/FAIL
GATE RESULT: <CLEAR TO ROUTE / BLOCKED — list the FAILs>
SIGNING ORDER: <sequential / parallel> — <why>
1. <name, title, entity> — <reason they sign first>
2. <name, title, entity>
ENVELOPE INSTRUCTIONS (portable to any e-sign tool)
- Recipients: <name — email — role — order>
- Fields per signer: <signature, date, title>
- CC on completion: <who>
- Reminders: <cadence> Expires: <date>
- Message: "<subject> / <one-line body>"
POST-SIGNATURE
- File executed copy: <location> as <naming convention>
- Distribute to: <who>
- Obligations calendar:
| Date | Obligation | Owner | Alert lead |
|--------|--------------------------------|-------|------------|
| <date> | <renewal notice window opens> | <who> | <30 days> |
*Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.*Quality bar
- Gate runs on the actual final document, not a description of it
- Every gate item marked PASS or FAIL — any FAIL blocks routing
- Entity names checked against registered legal names, not brand names
- Signing order comes with a stated reason, not a default
- Envelope instructions executable in any e-sign tool without follow-up questions
- Every future obligation lands on the calendar with an owner and an alert
Example
Invocation: "The Acme MSA is final — route it. Their CFO signs, then our CEO."
Produces: Gate result BLOCKED on one item — Exhibit B is referenced in §4.2 but not attached — all else PASS. Once cleared: sequential order (Acme CFO first; our CEO last to control the effective date), full envelope instructions with 3-day reminders, filing to the contracts archive as 2026-07-acme-msa-executed.pdf, and three calendar entries including the 60-day renewal notice window with a 30-day alert.
Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

