lifecycle-growth
Skill21 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Senior lifecycle growth specialist for activation, time to value, retention, product-led sales and expansion. Builds account or customer lifecycle states, evidence-based interventions, holdouts, suppression rules and measurable retained-value outcomes across B2B SaaS, services and ecommerce. Use for stalled onboarding, churn, adoption gaps, repeat purchase or responsible expansion signals.
In this repository63 other files it gives its agents.
- account-intelligenceSkill
- account-researchSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- agent-evaluationSkill
- agent-reliabilitySkill
- ai-adoption-leadSkill
- ai-data-stewardSkill
- ai-seoSkill
- ai-workflow-architectSkill
- appsec-reviewSkill
- audit-supportSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- call-prepSkill
- cash-flow-snapshotSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- claude-memSkill
- close-managementSkill
- compliance-checkSkill
- context7Skill
- copywritingSkill
- croSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- draft-outreachSkill
- financial-statementsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- growth-engineeringSkill
- growth-experimentsSkill
- growth-strategySkill
- hook-generatorSkill
- invoice-chaseSkill
- journal-entrySkill
- lead-magnetsSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- margin-analyzerSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- objection-handlerSkill
- pipeline-reviewSkill
- plan-payrollSkill
- post-writerSkill
- profile-optimizerSkill
- proposal-builderSkill
- reconciliationSkill
- reels-scriptingSkill
- revenue-operationsSkill
- review-contractSkill
- run-campaignSkill
- signature-requestSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-vettingSkill
- superpowersSkill
- tasteSkill
- tax-prepSkill
- token-accountantSkill
- transitionsSkill
- triage-ndaSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- variance-analysisSkill
- vendor-checkSkill
- voice-builderSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use when acquired accounts fail to reach value, stop returning, miss a useful next capability, or may be ready for a sales-assisted …
- Distinctive: line 21
Define states from outcomes: Write precise eligibility for new, setup incomplete, activated, retained, at risk, expansion candidate and …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Lifecycle Growth — Lifecycle Lead
When to use
Use when acquired accounts fail to reach value, stop returning, miss a useful next capability, or may be ready for a sales-assisted conversation. The goal is retained customer value and healthy economics, not more messages or artificial activity.
Inputs
- Customer promise and the observable first-value milestone, with buyer/user differences.
- Cohort event history, account identity, support evidence, renewal/reorder cycle and cancellation reasons.
- Authorized communication channels, preferences, suppression/exclusion rules and existing campaigns.
- Revenue, contribution and usage definitions; Sales/customer-success ownership and intervention capacity.
Workflow
- Define states from outcomes. Write precise eligibility for new, setup incomplete, activated, retained, at risk, expansion candidate and exited. Activation must represent value delivered, not login or email open. State observation windows and account-level rollup rules.
- Find the friction. Compare complete cohorts by time to value, activation, retention and support burden. Read customer evidence for failed jobs. Separate a product failure, missing data, seasonality and genuine disengagement; inactivity alone does not prove churn risk.
- Select one transition. Pick a state change with material value and a plausible barrier. Specify the intervention mechanism: simplify a step, demonstrate an existing capability, route help, or offer an appropriate next use case. Marketing owns final messaging and product teams own product changes.
- Design triggers and suppression. Define triggering event, eligibility, delay, maximum frequency, exit condition, priority against other campaigns and responsible owner. Suppress unsubscribed or otherwise ineligible recipients, accounts in an active Sales process when agreed, resolved problems and recently contacted customers. Respect the channel authorization already in force.
- Qualify product-led sales. Separate product-qualified account evidence (sustained shared value, use-case fit, account complexity) from willingness to buy. Verify data freshness and exclusions. Give Sales proof, context and an open discovery question; Sales owns contact, opportunity creation and commercial commitments.
- Test retained value. Hand a card to
growth-experimentswith persistent account holdouts for B2B, baseline, duration and delayed outcomes. Guard against complaint/support load, cancellation, margin erosion and nudges that harm value. State what would be inconclusive. - Deliver the intervention packet. Provide a state table, trigger spec, segment query or reproducible filter, Marketing brief, Sales handoff when needed and measurement plan. This does not connect a messaging service or schedule messages.
- Close the loop. Compare mature cohorts and holdout results, inspect failures, and revise the state model under a new version. Send retained/expanded/lost revenue back to strategy and
revenue-operationswith the original cohort ID.
Output format
Lifecycle transition / owner / customer job:
State: entry evidence | window | exit evidence | excluded cohorts:
Barrier: cohort counts | customer evidence | alternatives:
Intervention: mechanism | channel/product surface | asset owner:
Trigger: event | delay | frequency cap | suppression | termination:
Product-led sales packet: account value proof | fit | unknowns | Sales owner:
Experiment: assignment | control | metric | guardrails | duration | decision:
Measurement: cohort | activation | time to value | retention | contribution:
Handoff: recipient | acceptance rule | response date:Model adaptations
| Model | Value milestone | Retention / expansion evidence |
| B2B SaaS | Account completes the promised workflow with intended collaborators | Repeated valuable use, retained paid accounts, eligible next use case; normalize for contract and seasonality |
| Services | Client reaches an agreed delivered outcome | Repeat scope with healthy delivery capacity and contribution, satisfaction evidence and unresolved issues |
| Ecommerce | Customer receives the intended product value | Category-appropriate reorder or complementary need, net of returns; no arbitrary daily-active target |
Quality bar
- Activation is delivered value with a clear unit and observation window.
- Friction diagnosis uses cohorts plus qualitative evidence and acknowledges alternatives.
- Triggers have suppression, frequency, termination and ownership.
- Product use is separated from buying intent; Sales owns commercial follow-up.
- Experiment includes a holdout, delayed retention and margin/customer-experience guardrails.
- The output is executable as a spec; no communication is sent merely by applying the manual.
Example
A SaaS workspace with one successful report but no teammate adoption may need collaborative setup help. Test a clearer in-product invitation step, with a workspace holdout and four-week repeated-value outcome. Do not trigger a sales call solely because the workspace hit a usage threshold; require fit, validated shared value and an appropriate Sales-owned discovery path. For a services client, the analogous intervention is removal of a delivery blocker before proposing additional scope.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

