compliance-check
Skill21 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Compliance pre-flight for a feature, campaign, or initiative — maps the data and activity involved, checks applicable regimes (privacy/GDPR-style, consumer protection, marketing rules, sector-specific), lists required approvals and notices, builds a gap list with remediation owners, and ends in a go/no-go recommendation with conditions. Use when the user says 'can we ship this', 'is this campaign legal', 'any compliance issues here', or before anything touching personal data launches.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- EvezArt/evez-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- samsam007b/claude-code-standards-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- microsoft/aibast-agents-librarytheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- me2resh/apexyardtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- microsoft/aibast-agents-library★ 8same name
- chakmarebel/federal-proposal-copilot★ 4same name
- EvezArt/evez-skills★ 3same name
- JustineDevs/premortem★ 2same name
- samsam007b/claude-code-standards-kit★ 2same name
- evgenii-studitskikh/Claude-Code-SaaS-Studio★ 1same name
- nisarth/claude-skills-store★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository63 other files it gives its agents.
- account-intelligenceSkill
- account-researchSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- agent-evaluationSkill
- agent-reliabilitySkill
- ai-adoption-leadSkill
- ai-data-stewardSkill
- ai-seoSkill
- ai-workflow-architectSkill
- appsec-reviewSkill
- audit-supportSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- call-prepSkill
- cash-flow-snapshotSkill
- chief-of-staffSkill
- claude-memSkill
- close-managementSkill
- context7Skill
- copywritingSkill
- croSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- draft-outreachSkill
- financial-statementsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- growth-engineeringSkill
- growth-experimentsSkill
- growth-strategySkill
- hook-generatorSkill
- invoice-chaseSkill
- journal-entrySkill
- lead-magnetsSkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- lifecycle-growthSkill
- margin-analyzerSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- objection-handlerSkill
- pipeline-reviewSkill
- plan-payrollSkill
- post-writerSkill
- profile-optimizerSkill
- proposal-builderSkill
- reconciliationSkill
- reels-scriptingSkill
- revenue-operationsSkill
- review-contractSkill
- run-campaignSkill
- signature-requestSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-vettingSkill
- superpowersSkill
- tasteSkill
- tax-prepSkill
- token-accountantSkill
- transitionsSkill
- triage-ndaSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- variance-analysisSkill
- vendor-checkSkill
- voice-builderSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Compliance Check — Compliance Officer
"Check compliance"
A pre-flight, not an audit: it tells the team what clears the runway and what grounds the launch. Works from a plain-language description of the initiative.
When to use
- "Can we ship this feature next sprint?" — the pre-launch gate
- "Is this email campaign legal?" — marketing-rules check
- "We want to start collecting
<new data>" — privacy read before the schema changes - "Ops wants to roll this out in Germany" — new-jurisdiction scan
- Post-incident exposure questions belong to
legal-risk-assessment; this skill runs before launch, not after damage
Workflow
- Restate the initiative in one paragraph from user input: what ships, to whom, in which jurisdictions, on what date. Ask for whichever of those four is missing.
- Map data and activity: personal data categories (sensitive flagged), the flow from collection → storage → sharing → retention, plus regulated activity — payments, minors, automated decisions, health or financial data, outbound marketing.
- Run the regimes checklist, marking each APPLIES / N/A / UNCLEAR: privacy and data protection (lawful basis, notice, DPIA, cross-border transfer, processor terms); consumer protection (pricing claims, dark patterns, cancellation flows); marketing rules (consent for email/SMS, unsubscribe mechanics, endorsement disclosures); sector-specific regimes (health, finance, children, telecom); and existing contract commitments (DPAs, MSAs) that constrain the plan.
- For every APPLIES: name the concrete requirement — approval, notice, consent, record, or filing — and whether the plan meets it today.
- Build the gap list: requirement → current state → remediation → owner → deadline. Every UNCLEAR becomes a resolve-by task with an owner, never a silent assumption.
- Decide: GO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO. Conditions must be testable ("ship after the consent checkbox is unbundled from the ToS"), never "ensure compliance".
- Deliver the report and name the human approvals still outstanding (DPO, counsel, finance) so nobody mistakes a pre-flight for sign-off.
Output format
COMPLIANCE PRE-FLIGHT — <initiative> — <date>
Scope: <what / who / where / when>
DATA & ACTIVITY MAP
- Personal data: <categories — sensitive flagged>
- Flow: <collection → storage → sharing → retention>
- Regulated activity: <payments / minors / automated decisions / none>
APPLICABLE REGIMES
| Regime | Applies? | Requirements triggered |
|---------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------|
| Privacy / data protection | YES | <lawful basis, notice, DPIA, ...> |
| Consumer protection | N/A | — |
| Marketing rules | UNCLEAR | <what to resolve, by whom> |
| Sector-specific: <which> | YES | <requirement> |
| Existing contract terms | <...> | <DPA / MSA constraint> |
REQUIRED APPROVALS & NOTICES
- <approval or notice> — <in place / needed / unclear>
GAP LIST
| # | Gap | Remediation | Owner | Due |
|---|-----|-------------|-------|-----|
| 1 | <requirement not met> | <fix> | <who> | <date> |
RECOMMENDATION: <GO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO>
Conditions: <numbered, testable — empty only on a clean GO>
*Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.*Quality bar
- Every regime marked APPLIES / N/A / UNCLEAR — nothing skipped silently
- Every UNCLEAR carries a resolve-by task and owner, never an assumption
- Every gap has a named owner and a deadline
- Conditions on a GO are testable, not "ensure compliance"
- Sensitive data categories called out wherever they appear
- Outstanding human approvals listed by role
Example
Invocation: "We want to add session-replay analytics to the EU checkout flow next month."
Produces: Map showing behavioral data plus payment-adjacent inputs; privacy regime APPLIES (lawful basis, notice update, DPIA, processor DPA with the replay vendor), consumer protection N/A, marketing N/A. Gap list: mask card fields (engineering, pre-launch), update the privacy notice (legal, pre-launch), run the DPIA (DPO, two weeks). Recommendation: GO WITH CONDITIONS — all three gaps closed before traffic.
Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

