objection-handler
Skill13 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when a prospect raises an objection in a reply, on a call or in a deal: \"how do I respond to 'too expensive'\", \"handle this objection\", \"build an objection handling guide\", \"they said they're happy with their current vendor\". Diagnoses what the objection really means, picks the response pattern (clarify, reframe, prove, defer or walk away), writes responses for email, call and LinkedIn, and builds a reusable objection library with proof for each.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- marichalnick/sales-skills-for-claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Jakeschincariol/whale-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- adops-tool/AdTech-LeadGen-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- evyevans/realtyskillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- duncan-buildroom/profit-room-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- duncan-buildroom/freeskillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use offer-builder.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
duncan-buildroomSkilloffer-builder
Build a Hormozi-style "Grand Slam Offer" so good people feel stupid saying no — engineered around the Value Equation (bigger dream outcome, higher belief it'll work, less time, less effort). Use this when the user says "build my offer", "make my offer irresistible", "help me package what I sell", "I don't know how to price/pitch this", "grand slam offer", "I built a product but nobody's buying", or when they have a thing to sell but no compelling way to present it. Push to run this before they try to sell anything.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- duncan-buildroom/freeskills★ 65same name
- GTMify/aigtm★ 25same name
- alebgl77/claude-inc★ 21same name
- duncan-buildroom/profit-room-skills★ 18same name
- Jakeschincariol/whale-skill★ 15same name
- ilya-a11y/growthband-outbound-skills★ 13same name
- saberapp/skills★ 4same name
- Ootto-AI/claude-lead-skills★ 2same name
- adops-tool/AdTech-LeadGen-agent-skills★ 1same name
- AmazingPhotoVideo/ai-for-realtors★ 0same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- abm-account-planSkill
- account-research-briefSkill
- account-tieringSkill
- aeo-answer-optimizerSkill
- breakup-emailSkill
- buyer-persona-builderSkill
- buying-committee-mapperSkill
- buying-signal-scoringSkill
- call-coaching-scorecardSkill
- campaign-performance-analyzerSkill
- case-study-writerSkill
- churn-win-backSkill
- closed-lost-reactivationSkill
- cold-call-scriptSkill
- cold-email-sequenceSkill
- cold-email-writerSkill
- comparison-page-writerSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- competitor-teardownSkill
- crm-hygiene-auditSkill
- customer-interview-guideSkill
- deal-qualificationSkill
- deliverability-auditSkill
- discovery-call-prepSkill
- domain-warmup-planSkill
- email-authentication-setupSkill
- email-copy-reviewSkill
- event-follow-upSkill
- expansion-opportunity-finderSkill
- first-line-personalizationSkill
- follow-up-email-writerSkill
- funding-signal-outreachSkill
- gtm-global-rulesSkill
- hiring-signal-outreachSkill
- icp-builderSkill
- job-change-playsSkill
- lead-list-builderSkill
- lead-magnet-builderSkill
- lead-scoring-modelSkill
- linkedin-comment-strategySkill
- linkedin-connection-noteSkill
- linkedin-message-sequenceSkill
- linkedin-post-writerSkill
- linkedin-profile-optimizerSkill
- list-cleaningSkill
- lookalike-account-finderSkill
- meeting-booking-replySkill
- messaging-matrixSkill
- multichannel-cadenceSkill
- mutual-action-planSkill
- negotiation-playbookSkill
- no-show-recoverySkill
- outbound-ab-testSkill
- outbound-mathSkill
- outreach-compliance-checkSkill
- pipeline-reviewSkill
- post-engagement-outreachSkill
- proposal-follow-upSkill
- prospect-research-briefSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use this when a buyer pushes back.
- Distinctive: line 37
Clarify: ask a question that surfaces the real concern.
- Distinctive: line 41
Walk away: when the objection reveals a genuine bad fit, say so.
- Distinctive: line 46
Read references/objection-library.md for responses to the 12 most common B2B objections, by stage.
- Distinctive: line 49
Every objection goes into the library with the response that worked.
- Distinctive: line 60
MUST clarify before rebutting when the real concern is unclear.
- Distinctive: line 61
MUST use only approved proof points and real pricing.
- Distinctive: line 62
NEVER pressure with fake deadlines or "this price ends Friday" unless it is true.
- Distinctive: line 63
NEVER disparage a competitor the buyer uses.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Use this when a buyer pushes back. Most objections are questions in disguise; the response that works first finds out which question.
Inputs
- The objection, in the buyer's exact words.
- Context: cold reply, discovery call, late-stage deal; who said it.
- Proof available: customer stories, numbers, documents.
The play
1. Diagnose before answering
| Surface objection | Often really means |
| "Too expensive" | Value not clear yet, wrong package, budget timing, or a competitor quote |
| "We already have a solution" | Switching feels risky; current pain not acknowledged |
| "Not a priority" | Problem not tied to something they are measured on |
| "Send me some info" | Polite exit, or genuinely busy |
| "I need to talk to my team" | Not the decision-maker, or not convinced enough to champion |
| "We tried something like this" | Past failure; fear of repeating it |
2. Choose the pattern
- Clarify: ask a question that surfaces the real concern. Default first move.
- Reframe: change the comparison (cost of the problem vs the price; risk of doing nothing).
- Prove: a peer who had the same concern and what happened.
- Defer: agree a specific later moment when the condition changes.
- Walk away: when the objection reveals a genuine bad fit, say so. It builds trust and saves time.
3. Write the response
Acknowledge in a few words (no "I totally understand"), then the pattern. Keep email responses under 80 words. On calls, ask and then stop talking.
Read references/objection-library.md for responses to the 12 most common B2B objections, by stage.
4. Log it
Every objection goes into the library with the response that worked. Patterns across deals feed messaging and product.
What good looks like
- The first response is usually a question.
- Proof matches the objection: a security concern gets a security document, not a ROI story.
- Bad-fit objections are accepted, not "overcome".
- The common mistake is arguing: answering a price objection with a list of features.
Rules
- MUST clarify before rebutting when the real concern is unclear.
- MUST use only approved proof points and real pricing.
- NEVER pressure with fake deadlines or "this price ends Friday" unless it is true.
- NEVER disparage a competitor the buyer uses.
Example prompts
- "Prospect replied 'we're happy with our current vendor'. Draft a response."
- "Build an objection library for our sales team from these 20 call notes."
- "On calls I freeze at 'it's too expensive'. Give me a talk track."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

