north-star-metric
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Define a customer-centric North Star Metric plus a tree of 3-5 input metrics that drive it, where the North Star is anchored to the actual value customers describe getting from the product in real evidence. Use when the user says 'define our north star', 'what should we measure', 'pick a key metric', 'set up a metrics framework', 'what's our North Star', or 'what drives our growth'. Trigger terms: north star, north star metric, NSM, key metric, input metrics, what to measure, metrics framework, OMTM, leading indicator. Not for an ops/health monitoring dashboard — this is the single value metric and its drivers.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- About-Intelligence/awesome-marketing-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yuusakuri/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- fullstackinnoAI/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- zpower426/pmpowerstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use positioning-ideas, gtm-motions and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
About-IntelligenceSkillpositioning-ideas
Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.
Also in 5 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillgtm-motions
Identify the best GTM motions and tools across 7 motion types: Inbound, Outbound, Paid Digital, Community, Partners, ABM, and PLG.
Also in 5 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-existing
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-ideas-new
Brainstorm feature ideas for a new product in initial discovery from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives. Use when starting product discovery for a new product, exploring features for a startup idea, or doing initial ideation.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +1 more from About-Intelligence
- +1 more from skytiger6724
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- About-Intelligence/awesome-marketing-skills★ 14same name
- deciqAI/knowledge-skills★ 13same name
- fzfclee/consulting-skills★ 6same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- 45ck/marketing-product-skills★ 3same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2same name
- daviszhen/agent-skills★ 1same name
- fullstackinnoAI/skills★ 1same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- assumptionsSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- brainstorm-ideasSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- business-modelSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- create-prdSkill
- customer-journey-mapSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- daily-briefSkill
- deep-diveSkill
- development-planSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- gtm-strategySkill
- ideal-customer-profileSkill
- initial-reportSkill
- interview-scriptSkill
- list-capabilitiesSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- opportunity-solution-treeSkill
- outcome-roadmapSkill
- positioning-and-messagingSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- prioritize-featuresSkill
- product-strategySkill
- product-visionSkill
- release-notesSkill
- review-prSkill
- schedule-new-ingestion-tasksSkill
- segmentationSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- setup-evermuseSkill
- shipping-artifactsSkill
- strategy-frameworksSkill
- strategy-red-teamSkill
- summarize-conversationSkill
- test-scenariosSkill
- user-personasSkill
- user-storiesSkill
- using-evermuseSkill
- value-propositionSkill
- write-feature-specSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Required — one parallel batch of searches: Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:
- Very specific: line 80
If customers don't clearly articulate the value, say so — a North Star built on a guessed value definition is fragile.
- Very specific: line 83
After saving, offer: "Wire this into the GTM plan's metrics?" (/evermuse:gtm-strategy), or "Define the ICP whose value this measures?" …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
North Star Metric
Define a single, customer-centric North Star Metric and the 3–5 input metrics that drive it (a metrics constellation / input tree). The Evermuse twist: the North Star must reflect the value customers actually describe getting in real conversations — not a revenue proxy or a vanity number. You ground the value definition in quotes, then pick the metric that best captures it.
Step 0 — Relevance & availability
Confirm this is a metrics-definition task and Evermuse is connected. If the tools aren't present, produce a framework-only NSM labeled ⚠ ungrounded — Evermuse not connected and tell the user to authorize the MCP. See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-evermuse/SKILL.md Step 0.
Evermuse Grounding (required)
Follow ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-evermuse/SKILL.md.
Required — one parallel batch of searches. Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:
- 3–4
evidencesearches, each worded from a different angle (limitup to 50). Evidence comes back rich and varied — expect large, useful result sets. - one
guidancesearch and onecontextsearch (limitup to 50). These are usually sparse or empty; run them anyway and note when they're thin.
Read each response's digest — it reports how many more results exist. Use judgment on whether a query is worth pulling deeper (raise limit toward the 100 max and/or page with next_offset to avoid repeats), weighing payload size, remaining context, task complexity, and the value of the data. For deep pulls, consider spawning sub-agents — instruct them to return every citation with the same metadata the tools return (url, who_said_it, meeting_name, created_at) so you can still cite.
Optional — considered use. Once grounded, reach for the other tools only when they add value: a quote-angled search for verbatim voice, read_source for a single deep dive, inline citations (references/citations.md), and add_source to save the deliverable. Sources, citations, and saving are optional — not required.
Instructions
You are a metrics strategist defining the North Star for $ARGUMENTS. Where the source method reaches for "business context you provide," use Evermuse evidence (how customers describe value) as the primary input.
NSM is NOT multiple metrics, a revenue/LTV metric, an OKR, or a strategy. NSM IS a single customer-centric KPI reflecting the value customers get and leading long-term business success.
Step 1 — Classify the business game
Determine which game the product plays; it shapes the North Star family:
- Attention — time customers spend (Spotify, YouTube).
- Transaction — exchanges between customer and platform (Uber, Airbnb, Amazon).
- Productivity — how efficiently someone completes work or reaches a goal (Notion, Canva, Loom). Ground the pick: which framing matches the value customers actually describe? Cite it.
Step 2 — Define the North Star from evidenced value
State the single metric that captures the core value customers named. Validate against the 7 criteria: (1) easy to understand, (2) customer-centric, (3) reflects sustainable value/habit, (4) aligned to vision, (5) quantitative, (6) actionable, (7) leading indicator. Show the metric passing each — and tie criterion (2) directly to a customer quote about value.
Step 3 — Build the input-metric tree (3–5)
Define the input metrics that most directly drive the North Star. Each input should be easier to move short-term, provably contribute to the North Star outcome, and point to where teams optimize. Draw the tree: North Star = f(input₁, input₂, …). For each input, prefer a good-metric shape — a ratio or rate, comparative over time, and behavior-changing ("if it won't change what you do, it's a bad metric"). Distinguish leading from lagging, and note where a qualitative signal (customer complaints, sentiment from the corpus) is the earliest leading indicator.
Step 4 — Guardrails (brief)
Name 1–2 health guardrails so optimizing the North Star doesn't quietly harm the customer (e.g. quality, latency, churn). This is the useful half of a metrics dashboard — not a full ops dashboard; for that, keep it out of scope.
Deliverable format
# North Star — [product]
**Business game:** [Attention / Transaction / Productivity] — because [evidenced value, [`1`](URL)].
**North Star Metric:** [metric]
**Why it captures value:** > "[customer quote about the value]" — [attribution] [`2`](URL)
**7-criteria check:** [✓ understandable · ✓ customer-centric [`2`](URL) · ✓ sustainable · ✓ vision-aligned [`3`](URL) · ✓ quantitative · ✓ actionable · ✓ leading]
**Input-metric tree** (North Star = f(inputs))
| Input metric | Shape (ratio/rate) | How it drives NSM | Lead/Lag |
|---|---|---|---|
| [input 1] | [rate] | [link, cited [`4`](URL)] | Leading |
**Guardrails:** [health metric 1], [health metric 2].Honesty when evidence is thin
If customers don't clearly articulate the value, say so — a North Star built on a guessed value definition is fragile. Flag it as a hypothesis and suggest interviews (/evermuse:interview if available) to confirm the value the metric is meant to track.
Save & hand off
After saving, offer: "Wire this into the GTM plan's metrics?" (/evermuse:gtm-strategy), or "Define the ICP whose value this measures?" (/evermuse:ideal-customer-profile).
Further reading
- Adapted from phuryn/pm-skills
north-star-metric, absorbing the input-tree half ofmetrics-dashboard(MIT); grounding is Evermuse-native. - The North Star Framework 101
- AARRR (Pirate) Metrics
- Are You Tracking the Right Metrics?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

