positioning-and-messaging
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate differentiated positioning options and campaign/message ideas written in your customers' own mined vocabulary, where every message maps to a real quote that proves it resonates. Use when the user says 'how should we position this', 'position the product', 'differentiate from competitors', 'write our messaging', 'brainstorm marketing campaigns', 'promote the product', or 'what's our positioning'. Trigger terms: positioning, positioning statement, messaging, differentiation, value proposition, marketing ideas, campaign ideas, tagline, how to position. Not for a full launch plan — use gtm-strategy for that.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- NadavShanun-design/opengtmtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- writer/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- writer/skills★ 9same name
- NadavShanun-design/opengtm★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- assumptionsSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- brainstorm-ideasSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- business-modelSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- create-prdSkill
- customer-journey-mapSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- daily-briefSkill
- deep-diveSkill
- development-planSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- gtm-strategySkill
- ideal-customer-profileSkill
- initial-reportSkill
- interview-scriptSkill
- list-capabilitiesSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- opportunity-solution-treeSkill
- outcome-roadmapSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- prioritize-featuresSkill
- product-strategySkill
- product-visionSkill
- release-notesSkill
- review-prSkill
- schedule-new-ingestion-tasksSkill
- segmentationSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- setup-evermuseSkill
- shipping-artifactsSkill
- strategy-frameworksSkill
- strategy-red-teamSkill
- summarize-conversationSkill
- test-scenariosSkill
- user-personasSkill
- user-storiesSkill
- using-evermuseSkill
- value-propositionSkill
- write-feature-specSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Required — one parallel batch of searches: Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:
- Distinctive: line 82
If the corpus doesn't yield distinctive customer language, say so — generic phrasing is a signal the positioning isn't validated yet.
- Very specific: line 85
After saving, offer: "Fold into the launch plan?" (/evermuse:gtm-strategy), "Build a battlecard for the top competitor?" …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Positioning & Messaging
Produce positioning options and campaign/message ideas — but written in the customer's own mined vocabulary, not marketer-speak. The Evermuse twist: every positioning angle and every campaign message maps to a verbatim quote that proves real people talk that way and care about that thing. A message you can't attach to a quote is a guess; cut it.
Step 0 — Relevance & availability
Confirm this is positioning / marketing work and Evermuse is connected. If the tools aren't present, produce framework-only positioning labeled ⚠ ungrounded — Evermuse not connected and tell the user to authorize the MCP. See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-evermuse/SKILL.md Step 0.
Evermuse Grounding (required)
Follow ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-evermuse/SKILL.md.
Required — one parallel batch of searches. Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:
- 3–4
evidencesearches, each worded from a different angle (limitup to 50). Evidence comes back rich and varied — expect large, useful result sets. - one
guidancesearch and onecontextsearch (limitup to 50). These are usually sparse or empty; run them anyway and note when they're thin.
Read each response's digest — it reports how many more results exist. Use judgment on whether a query is worth pulling deeper (raise limit toward the 100 max and/or page with next_offset to avoid repeats), weighing payload size, remaining context, task complexity, and the value of the data. For deep pulls, consider spawning sub-agents — instruct them to return every citation with the same metadata the tools return (url, who_said_it, meeting_name, created_at) so you can still cite.
Optional — considered use. Once grounded, reach for the other tools only when they add value: a quote-angled search for verbatim voice, read_source for a single deep dive, inline citations (references/citations.md), and add_source to save the deliverable. Sources, citations, and saving are optional — not required.
Instructions
You are developing positioning and messaging for $ARGUMENTS. Where the source method reaches for "brainstorm from context," use Evermuse evidence as the primary source — the customer's actual words — and context (competitor positioning) as secondary.
Part A — Positioning options (differentiated)
A1. Competitive landscape. Identify the top competitors (from context + list_competitors if useful, labeled secondary). For each: their positioning angle, audience focus, differentiators they emphasize, and the gap they leave open.
A2. Generate 5 positioning options. Each must be differentiated from competitors, resonate with the mined customer values/needs, emphasize a capability competitors downplay, and claim unclaimed territory. For each, provide:
- Positioning statement — e.g. "The only [category] for [segment] who want to [outcome]" — using the customer's own words for [outcome].
- Strategic rationale — why it resonates and differentiates.
- Supporting messages — reinforcing lines.
- Competitive advantage — the capability that lets you own this claim.
- Proof quote — > "[verbatim]" — [attribution]
1. If no quote supports it, the option is speculative — mark it.
Part B — Campaign / message ideas
Generate 5 creative, cost-effective campaign ideas to carry the chosen positioning to the target segment. For each:
- Channel — primary channel (content, social, community, partnerships, email…).
- Core message — in mined customer vocabulary.
- Why it works — grounded in a customer quote about what they care about (
1). - Cost efficiency — what makes it high-impact on a limited budget.
Prioritize high-impact-low-budget and unconventional angles. Every core message must map to a proof quote — that mapping is the whole point.
Deliverable format
# Positioning & Messaging — [product]
## Positioning options
### Option 1 — [name]
**Statement:** [The only … for … who want to …]
**Rationale:** [why]. **Advantage:** [capability]. **Territory:** [unclaimed gap vs [competitor], [`1`](URL)].
**Proof:** > "[verbatim]" — [attribution] [`2`](URL)
… (options 2–5) …
## Campaign ideas
| # | Channel | Core message (mined) | Why it works | Proof quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [channel] | "[message]" | [reason] | > "[quote]" — [attribution] [`3`](URL) |Honesty when evidence is thin
If the corpus doesn't yield distinctive customer language, say so — generic phrasing is a signal the positioning isn't validated yet. Flag which messages rest on real quotes vs. which are hypotheses to test.
Save & hand off
After saving, offer: "Fold into the launch plan?" (/evermuse:gtm-strategy), "Build a battlecard for the top competitor?" (/evermuse:competitive-battlecard), or "Sharpen the ICP behind this?" (/evermuse:ideal-customer-profile).
Further reading
- Merged and adapted from phuryn/pm-skills
positioning-ideas+marketing-ideas(MIT); grounding is Evermuse-native. - How to Design a Value Proposition Customers Can't Resist?
- Product Management vs. Product Marketing vs. Product Growth 101
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

