agentleFS
UsermuseUsermuse/em-plugin/skills/pricing-strategy/SKILL.md

pricing-strategy

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design pricing and monetization grounded in real willingness-to-pay signals, pricing objections, and value language from customer evidence — with competitor pricing as a labeled secondary input. Use when the user says 'how should we price this', 'pricing strategy', 'what should we charge', 'pricing tiers', 'how do we monetize', 'freemium vs paid', or 'raise our prices'. Trigger terms: pricing, pricing strategy, monetization, willingness to pay, price point, tiers, freemium, revenue model, what to charge. Not for full business-model canvases.

110 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    micro-saas-launcher

    Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • mastepanoskiSkill

    ux-audit-rethink

    Comprehensive UX audit using IxDF's 7 factors, 5 usability characteristics, and 5 interaction dimensions. Holistic evaluation with redesign proposals based on user-centered design principles.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ncklrsSkill

    seo-content-strategist

    Expert SEO content strategy for SaaS and B2B sites. Use when doing keyword research, planning content clusters, creating pillar pages, optimizing on-page SEO, fixing technical SEO issues, building links, refreshing content, implementing programmatic SEO, mapping search intent, optimizing for SERP features, or measuring content performance. Use for SEO audits, content gap analysis, and organic growth strategy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +6 more from nicepkg

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 103 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Required — one parallel batch of searches: Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:

    line 29

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 103 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Pricing & Monetization Strategy

Recommend a pricing model and structure, or brainstorm 3–5 monetization options, anchored in what customers actually said about price — their willingness-to-pay signals, objections, and the value they name. Competitor pricing is a secondary check, not the anchor. Value-based pricing built on customer quotes beats guessing from competitor screenshots.

Step 0 — Relevance & availability

Confirm this is pricing/monetization work and Evermuse is connected. If not, produce a framework-only recommendation labeled ⚠ ungrounded — Evermuse not connected and tell the user to authorize the MCP. See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-evermuse/SKILL.md Step 0.

Evermuse Grounding (required)

Follow ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-evermuse/SKILL.md.

Required — one parallel batch of searches. Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:

  • 3–4 evidence searches, each worded from a different angle (limit up to 50). Evidence comes back rich and varied — expect large, useful result sets.
  • one guidance search and one context search (limit up to 50). These are usually sparse or empty; run them anyway and note when they're thin.

Read each response's digest — it reports how many more results exist. Use judgment on whether a query is worth pulling deeper (raise limit toward the 100 max and/or page with next_offset to avoid repeats), weighing payload size, remaining context, task complexity, and the value of the data. For deep pulls, consider spawning sub-agents — instruct them to return every citation with the same metadata the tools return (url, who_said_it, meeting_name, created_at) so you can still cite.

Optional — considered use. Once grounded, reach for the other tools only when they add value: a quote-angled search for verbatim voice, read_source for a single deep dive, inline citations (references/citations.md), and add_source to save the deliverable. Sources, citations, and saving are optional — not required.

Instructions

You are a pricing strategist for $ARGUMENTS. Ground everything in value delivered and evidenced willingness to pay.

A) Pricing strategy (default)

  1. Value delivered — core value prop; the customer's alternative and its cost; quantifiable outcome (time saved, revenue gained, cost cut); WTP from evidence, quoted.
  2. Pick a model — Flat-rate · Per-seat · Usage-based · Tiered · Freemium · Freemium+usage · Value-based. Recommend the best fit and say why, in terms of the value metric customers care about.
  3. Competitive pricing (secondary) — map competitor tiers via list_competitors/get_competitor_capabilities + context; place your product (premium / mid / budget); find gaps. Label secondary.
  4. Structure — 2–4 tiers with clear differentiation; feature-gate on value metrics (not arbitrary limits); pick the value metric (seats, events, storage, API calls); anchor the popular tier; ~15–20% annual discount.
  5. Price sensitivity — Van Westendorp if survey data exists; otherwise estimate from evidenced WTP + competitor pricing. Surface pricing objections from evidence as the sensitivity signal.
  6. Experiments — pricing-page A/Bs, founder-led sales conversations, landing-page anchor tests, conversion cohort analysis.

B) Monetization brainstorm (when the user wants options, not one answer)

Generate 3–5 distinct models (Freemium, Subscription, Usage-based, Seat-based, One-time, Marketplace fee, Ads). For each: how it works for this product · audience fit (grounded in evidence) · unit economics (CAC/LTV/break-even) · risks · competitive position (context, secondary) · a low-cost validation experiment with a success metric. Recommend 1–2 to test first.

Where the source method reaches for "web search / competitor pricing / survey files," use Evermuse evidence (WTP, objections, value language) as the primary source; competitor pricing and market context are secondary.

Deliverable format

# Pricing Recommendation — [product]

**Recommended model:** [model] · **Value metric:** [unit]
*Grounded in WTP:* > "[quote about price/value]" — [attribution] [`1`](URL)

| Tier | Price | Target segment | Key features | Positioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|

**Objections heard (sensitivity signal):** [cited [`2`](URL)]
**Competitor pricing (secondary):** [table] — via list_competitors/context
**Assumptions → tests:** [assumption] → [experiment]
**Risks → mitigations:** …

Further reading

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.