interview-script
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write a Mom-Test customer interview guide — warm-up, JTBD exploration, wrap-up — but first check the evidence for what's ALREADY known so the questions target the open gaps instead of re-asking answered questions. Use when the user asks to 'write an interview script', 'prep for a user interview', 'discovery interview questions', 'interview guide', 'what should I ask customers', or 'plan a research call'. Trigger terms: interview script, interview guide, user interview, discovery interview, customer interview questions, Mom Test, research questions to ask. Not for summarizing an interview already done (that's summarize-conversation).
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Adelie-Squad/solosquadtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yuusakuri/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- The-Utopia-Studio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- stefanomartiradonna/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 14, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, prioritize-assumptions and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-existing
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
Also in 7 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillprioritize-assumptions
Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.
Also in 7 projects that use this
45ckSkillpestle-analysis
Also in 7 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillpositioning-ideas
Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.
Also in 7 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillproduct-name
Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +5 more from skytiger6724
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- launchapp-dev/animus-cli★ 39same name
- Adelie-Squad/solosquad★ 25same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2same name
- daviszhen/agent-skills★ 1same name
- miovrag/claude-skills★ 1same name
- maeng777/claude-skills★ 0same name
- stefanomartiradonna/claude-skills★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- assumptionsSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- brainstorm-ideasSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- business-modelSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- create-prdSkill
- customer-journey-mapSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- daily-briefSkill
- deep-diveSkill
- development-planSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- gtm-strategySkill
- ideal-customer-profileSkill
- initial-reportSkill
- list-capabilitiesSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- opportunity-solution-treeSkill
- outcome-roadmapSkill
- positioning-and-messagingSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- prioritize-featuresSkill
- product-strategySkill
- product-visionSkill
- release-notesSkill
- review-prSkill
- schedule-new-ingestion-tasksSkill
- segmentationSkill
- sentiment-analysisSkill
- setup-evermuseSkill
- shipping-artifactsSkill
- strategy-frameworksSkill
- strategy-red-teamSkill
- summarize-conversationSkill
- test-scenariosSkill
- user-personasSkill
- user-storiesSkill
- using-evermuseSkill
- value-propositionSkill
- write-feature-specSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Required — one parallel batch of searches: Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:
- Distinctive: line 58
Mom-Test rules: ask about their life not your idea · the past not the future · talk less (80/20) · never pitch · hunt for strong emotion · …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Customer Interview Script (targeted at the gaps)
A Mom-Test interview guide — ask about their life, not your idea; the past, not the future. The Evermuse difference: before writing a single question, check what the corpus already answers. No point spending a scarce interview slot re-asking what six customers already told you. The script targets the open gaps, so each call buys new knowledge instead of confirming old.
Step 0 — Relevance & availability
Confirm this is interview prep and Evermuse is connected (see using-evermuse Step 0). If disconnected, you can still produce a solid Mom-Test script from the framework — label it ⚠ ungrounded and note you couldn't check what's already known, so it may re-ask settled questions.
Evermuse Grounding (required)
Follow ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/using-evermuse/SKILL.md.
Required — one parallel batch of searches. Verify the product (Rule 1), then fire in a single parallel batch:
- 3–4
evidencesearches, each worded from a different angle (limitup to 50). Evidence comes back rich and varied — expect large, useful result sets. - one
guidancesearch and onecontextsearch (limitup to 50). These are usually sparse or empty; run them anyway and note when they're thin.
Read each response's digest — it reports how many more results exist. Use judgment on whether a query is worth pulling deeper (raise limit toward the 100 max and/or page with next_offset to avoid repeats), weighing payload size, remaining context, task complexity, and the value of the data. For deep pulls, consider spawning sub-agents — instruct them to return every citation with the same metadata the tools return (url, who_said_it, meeting_name, created_at) so you can still cite.
Optional — considered use. Once grounded, reach for the other tools only when they add value: a quote-angled search for verbatim voice, read_source for a single deep dive, inline citations (references/citations.md), and add_source to save the deliverable. Sources, citations, and saving are optional — not required.
Instructions
- Clarify research objectives. What decision will this research inform? What assumptions need validating?
- Split known vs. open (the key step). From the grounded evidence, list what the corpus already answers (with quotes) and what remains genuinely open. Write questions only for the open set; briefly show the user what you cut and why.
Build the script — Mom-Test throughout:
Opening (2–3 min): purpose is learning not selling; no right/wrong answers; permission to record; confirm time.
Warm-up (5 min): role, typical day/week, how long they've done the relevant activity. Build rapport, understand context.
Core exploration — JTBD (15–20 min), weighted to the open gaps:
- Current behavior (past tense, specific): "Walk me through the last time you [did the thing]. What happened? What tools? How long? Who else?"
- Pain points (observe, don't lead): "What was the hardest part? What have you tried? What happened?"
- Desired outcomes (their words): "What does 'good' look like? How would you know it's working?"
- Willingness to pay (skin in the game): "How much time/money does this cost you today? Have you looked for a better solution?"
Probing: "Tell me more about that" · gentle "Why?" ×2–3 · "Can you give a specific example?" · "What happened next?" · "How did that make you feel?"
Mom-Test rules: ask about their life not your idea · the past not the future · talk less (80/20) · never pitch · hunt for strong emotion · compliments are noise.
Wrap-up (3–5 min): "Anything I didn't ask that matters?" · "Who else should I talk to?" · thanks · next steps.
- Note-taking template (include it):
Participant: [Name / ID] Date: [Date] Key Jobs: […] Current Solution: […] Biggest Pain: […] Desired Outcome: […] Willingness to Pay: […] Surprise Finding: […] Follow-up: […]
Deliverable
The script (with an up-front "Already known — not asking" box citing the corpus, and a "Targeting these gaps" list) plus the note-taking template. After the interview, hand off to /evermuse:summarize to feed the summary back into the corpus.
Further reading
- Adapted from phuryn/pm-skills (MIT) — interview-script. Method: The Mom Test (Rob Fitzpatrick); Product Trio: Teresa Torres, Continuous Discovery Habits.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

