lead-research-workflow-planner
Skill9 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Designs an end-to-end process for finding, extracting, enriching, qualifying, and exporting leads. Use when the user wants a repeatable lead workflow plan rather than a single source plan.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- account-prioritizationSkill
- b2b-lead-qualificationSkill
- candidate-qualificationSkill
- company-data-normalizationSkill
- company-researchSkill
- company-research-workflow-plannerSkill
- company-segmentationSkill
- competitor-researchSkill
- directory-research-plannerSkill
- duplicate-record-reviewSkill
- job-title-normalizationSkill
- lead-list-analysisSkill
- lead-list-segmentationSkill
- market-researchSkill
- outreach-brief-generatorSkill
- partner-qualificationSkill
- persona-classificationSkill
- person-researchSkill
- prospect-list-cleanupSkill
- recruiting-sourcing-plannerSkill
- research-gap-analysisSkill
- supplier-qualificationSkill
- territory-segmentationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 50
Keep the plan tool-agnostic unless tools are given.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Lead Research Workflow Planner
Purpose
Design an end-to-end process for finding, extracting, enriching, qualifying, and exporting leads.
When to use this skill
- Standing up a repeatable lead process
- Documenting a pipeline for a team
- Scoping a list-build project end to end
- Aligning sourcing, enrichment, and QC
When not to use this skill
- You only need to choose sources (use Directory Research Planner)
- You want the work executed now (this plans it)
- The goal is undefined
Required inputs
- A lead-generation goal or ICP
Optional inputs
- Tools available
- Output/CRM requirements
- Volume targets
Rules
- Cover the full pipeline, not just sourcing.
- Order stages logically with QC before export.
- Tie fields to the qualification goal.
- State risks and assumptions.
- Keep the plan tool-agnostic unless tools are given.
Process
- Parse the goal and constraints.
- Define ordered workflow stages.
- Specify sources, fields, and enrichment.
- Add quality-control steps.
- Define output and list risks.
Output format
Return a workflow plan with the following fields:
- workflow_stages
- source_types
- extraction_fields
- enrichment_steps
- quality_control_steps
- output_format
- risks_and_assumptions
Validation
- Confirm stages are ordered and complete.
- Confirm QC precedes export.
- Confirm fields support qualification.
Limitations
- A plan is not execution; results depend on tooling.
- Volume targets may need source validation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

