team-agent-orchestration
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design and coordinate a temporary agent team for large or risky work without turning Vibe Coding OS into a runtime. Use this when one agent cannot safely hold the whole domain, but keep final integration, verification, and attribution under one accountable owner. Use for large or risky Adaptive Flow tasks, multi-domain implementation, migration sweeps, adversarial review, or any change that benefits from separate producer, reviewer, tester, architect, or domain-analysis lanes. Do not use for tiny/small work, tightly coupled edits to…
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- renepf/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecctheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-librarytheir own version, first seen Aug 1, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 8same name
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 1same name
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1same name
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 0same name
- renepf/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository117 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- advanced-orchestrationSkill
- architect-agentSkill
- implementer-agentSkill
- quality-councilSkill
- reviewer-agentSkill
- tester-agentSkill
- writer-critic-pairSkill
- authoring-skillsSkill
- api-endpoint-qualitySkill
- async-job-qualitySkill
- auth-qualitySkill
- db-migration-qualitySkill
- frontend-state-qualitySkill
- acceptance-criteriaSkill
- adaptive-flowSkill
- adaptive-prompt-selectionSkill
- adversarial-code-reviewSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brownfield-spec-enhancementSkill
- bug-fix-lifecycleSkill
- checkpoint-validationSkill
- cicd-integrationSkill
- clarify-before-codeSkill
- claude-code-hooks-packSkill
- code-context-packSkill
- code-intelligence-reviewSkill
- context-policySkill
- context-rich-implementationSkill
- crash-proof-planningSkill
- critique-pass-protocolSkill
- dependency-aware-task-orderingSkill
- deprecation-migrationSkill
- disciplined-diagnosisSkill
- docs-authorSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- external-skillSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- git-guardrailsSkill
- goal-driven-executionSkill
- grill-user-before-buildingSkill
- guard-bypass-protocolSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- incremental-reviewSkill
- issue-slicingSkill
- lessons-learned-dbSkill
- loop-engineeringSkill
- model-aware-configSkill
- model-weakness-memorySkill
- multi-repo-learningSkill
- orchestration-workflowsSkill
- plan-driven-executionSkill
- plan-from-specSkill
- prd-from-contextSkill
- project-constitutionSkill
- prompt-architectureSkill
- prototype-before-commitmentSkill
- quality-engineSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Use for large or risky Adaptive Flow tasks, multi-domain implementation, migration sweeps, adversarial review, or any change that benefits …
- Distinctive: line 23
Do not use for tiny/small work, tightly coupled edits to the same files, or tasks where orchestration overhead exceeds value.
- Distinctive: line 45
Run domain analysis: list systems, files, risks, tests, and unknowns.
- Distinctive: line 89
Use progressive disclosure: give each worker only needed spec, files, constraints, and validation.
- Distinctive: line 90
Keep shared registries, migrations, global docs, and generated artifacts serialized unless one integrator owns them.
- Distinctive: line 91
Prefer worktrees for parallel write lanes when the harness supports them.
- Distinctive: line 92
Add watchdog rules for long-running teams: idle timeout, blocked-task escalation, and stop-on-conflict.
- Very specific: line 94
No upstream runtime, tmux layer, mailbox, hook daemon, installer, or generated .claude/agents/.claude/skills files are required by this …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: Team-Agent Orchestration
Purpose
Design and coordinate a temporary agent team for large or risky work without turning Vibe Coding OS into a runtime. Use this when one agent cannot safely hold the whole domain, but keep final integration, verification, and attribution under one accountable owner.
When to use
Use for large or risky Adaptive Flow tasks, multi-domain implementation, migration sweeps, adversarial review, or any change that benefits from separate producer, reviewer, tester, architect, or domain-analysis lanes.
Do not use for tiny/small work, tightly coupled edits to the same files, or tasks where orchestration overhead exceeds value.
Inputs
Task intent, spec/plan/tasks if available, affected domains, risk surfaces, validation commands, expected deliverables, write ownership, integration owner, and handoff format.
Team patterns
Choose the smallest pattern that fits:
| Pattern | Use when | Shape |
| Pipeline | Work has ordered phases. | domain analysis → design → implementation → verification. |
| Fan-out / fan-in | Multiple independent areas need coverage. | several explorers/implementers → one integrator. |
| Expert pool | Different lenses matter. | architecture, security, test, UX, docs. |
| Producer-reviewer | Quality risk is high. | author pass → separate skeptical pass. |
| Supervisor | Many tasks need routing. | coordinator owns task list and integration. |
| Hierarchical delegation | Scope is broad enough for sub-teams. | lead splits domains; each domain returns structured handoff. |
Workflow
- Classify with Adaptive Flow. Only proceed if team value is clear.
- Run domain analysis: list systems, files, risks, tests, and unknowns.
- Design the team: roles, pattern, file ownership, message channels, stop conditions.
- Generate role briefs in original wording: goal, scope, forbidden edits, inputs, outputs, validation.
- Generate supporting skills or checklists only when reused beyond the current task.
- Orchestrate work through visible tasks and structured handoffs.
- Fan results back to one integrator; never let workers merge blindly.
- Validate with dry-run reasoning first, then with the chosen checks on the integrated result.
- Compare “with team” vs “without team” cost/risk; record if team use was worthwhile.
Role routing
- Domain analyst: read-only map of business/domain boundaries.
- Architect: design and trade-off pass; no code ownership unless explicitly assigned.
- Implementer: focused write scope; minimal diff.
- Reviewer/critic: separate lane; tries to reject unsafe or incomplete work.
- Tester/verifier: proves acceptance criteria and reports gaps.
- Integrator: owns final diff, conflicts, registry/reference updates, and final verification.
Handoff contract
Each role returns:
## Scope
- Role, files/domains, and exclusions.
## Findings or changes
- What was learned or changed.
## Decisions
- Material choices and rejected options.
## Risks
- Correctness, coordination, attribution, validation, or rollback concerns.
## Verification
- Exact checks run, results, and limits.
## Next action
- What the integrator should do now.Guardrails
- Use progressive disclosure: give each worker only needed spec, files, constraints, and validation.
- Keep shared registries, migrations, global docs, and generated artifacts serialized unless one integrator owns them.
- Prefer worktrees for parallel write lanes when the harness supports them.
- Add watchdog rules for long-running teams: idle timeout, blocked-task escalation, and stop-on-conflict.
- Dynamic scaling is allowed only by explicit need: add roles for uncovered risk, remove roles once they stop adding evidence.
- No upstream runtime, tmux layer, mailbox, hook daemon, installer, or generated
.claude/agents/.claude/skillsfiles are required by this skill. - Native team spawning exists only when a separate runtime such as the OMC plugin is installed; this repo provides markdown guidance, not that runtime.
Outputs
Team architecture note, role briefs, task ownership table, handoffs, integrated patch or docs, validation evidence, and an orchestration retrospective.
Failure modes
- Spawning a team for tiny/small work where solo flow is faster and safer.
- Workers editing shared files, registries, or references without one integrator.
- Authoring and approval happening in the same lane (self-approval).
- Handoffs that omit validation status or rejected options.
- Documenting upstream runtime behavior as if Vibe Coding OS can enforce it.
- Adding roles that duplicate each other and produce noise instead of evidence.
Verification checklist
- Team pattern selected and justified.
- Domain analysis completed before role assignment.
- Write scopes and integrator are explicit.
- Review/test lanes are separate from authoring lanes.
- Dry-run validation found no obvious coordination gap.
- Final integrated result was verified, not only per-agent outputs.
- Attribution says inspiration-only; no upstream text/code/runtime was copied.
Related artifacts
commands/vibe-team.mdtemplates/team-architecture-template.mddocs/workflows/team-agent-orchestration.mdskills/core/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.mddocs/workflows/adaptive-flow.md
Constitution alignment
This skill keeps teams proportional, accountable, original, and verified. It adapts orchestration ideas as markdown guidance only; it does not vendor or require any upstream engine.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

