agentleFS
roronoazoroshao369roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-os/skills/core/team-agent-orchestration/SKILL.md

team-agent-orchestration

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design and coordinate a temporary agent team for large or risky work without turning Vibe Coding OS into a runtime. Use this when one agent cannot safely hold the whole domain, but keep final integration, verification, and attribution under one accountable owner. Use for large or risky Adaptive Flow tasks, multi-domain implementation, migration sweeps, adversarial review, or any change that benefits from separate producer, reviewer, tester, architect, or domain-analysis lanes. Do not use for tiny/small work, tightly coupled edits to…

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use for large or risky Adaptive Flow tasks, multi-domain implementation, migration sweeps, adversarial review, or any change that benefits …

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not use for tiny/small work, tightly coupled edits to the same files, or tasks where orchestration overhead exceeds value.

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Run domain analysis: list systems, files, risks, tests, and unknowns.

    line 45
  4. Distinctive:

    Use progressive disclosure: give each worker only needed spec, files, constraints, and validation.

    line 89
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep shared registries, migrations, global docs, and generated artifacts serialized unless one integrator owns them.

    line 90
  6. Distinctive:

    Prefer worktrees for parallel write lanes when the harness supports them.

    line 91
  7. Distinctive:

    Add watchdog rules for long-running teams: idle timeout, blocked-task escalation, and stop-on-conflict.

    line 92
  8. Very specific:

    No upstream runtime, tmux layer, mailbox, hook daemon, installer, or generated .claude/agents/.claude/skills files are required by this …

    line 94

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill: Team-Agent Orchestration

Purpose

Design and coordinate a temporary agent team for large or risky work without turning Vibe Coding OS into a runtime. Use this when one agent cannot safely hold the whole domain, but keep final integration, verification, and attribution under one accountable owner.

When to use

Use for large or risky Adaptive Flow tasks, multi-domain implementation, migration sweeps, adversarial review, or any change that benefits from separate producer, reviewer, tester, architect, or domain-analysis lanes.

Do not use for tiny/small work, tightly coupled edits to the same files, or tasks where orchestration overhead exceeds value.

Inputs

Task intent, spec/plan/tasks if available, affected domains, risk surfaces, validation commands, expected deliverables, write ownership, integration owner, and handoff format.

Team patterns

Choose the smallest pattern that fits:

PatternUse whenShape
PipelineWork has ordered phases.domain analysis → design → implementation → verification.
Fan-out / fan-inMultiple independent areas need coverage.several explorers/implementers → one integrator.
Expert poolDifferent lenses matter.architecture, security, test, UX, docs.
Producer-reviewerQuality risk is high.author pass → separate skeptical pass.
SupervisorMany tasks need routing.coordinator owns task list and integration.
Hierarchical delegationScope is broad enough for sub-teams.lead splits domains; each domain returns structured handoff.

Workflow

  1. Classify with Adaptive Flow. Only proceed if team value is clear.
  2. Run domain analysis: list systems, files, risks, tests, and unknowns.
  3. Design the team: roles, pattern, file ownership, message channels, stop conditions.
  4. Generate role briefs in original wording: goal, scope, forbidden edits, inputs, outputs, validation.
  5. Generate supporting skills or checklists only when reused beyond the current task.
  6. Orchestrate work through visible tasks and structured handoffs.
  7. Fan results back to one integrator; never let workers merge blindly.
  8. Validate with dry-run reasoning first, then with the chosen checks on the integrated result.
  9. Compare “with team” vs “without team” cost/risk; record if team use was worthwhile.

Role routing

  • Domain analyst: read-only map of business/domain boundaries.
  • Architect: design and trade-off pass; no code ownership unless explicitly assigned.
  • Implementer: focused write scope; minimal diff.
  • Reviewer/critic: separate lane; tries to reject unsafe or incomplete work.
  • Tester/verifier: proves acceptance criteria and reports gaps.
  • Integrator: owns final diff, conflicts, registry/reference updates, and final verification.

Handoff contract

Each role returns:

## Scope
- Role, files/domains, and exclusions.

## Findings or changes
- What was learned or changed.

## Decisions
- Material choices and rejected options.

## Risks
- Correctness, coordination, attribution, validation, or rollback concerns.

## Verification
- Exact checks run, results, and limits.

## Next action
- What the integrator should do now.

Guardrails

  • Use progressive disclosure: give each worker only needed spec, files, constraints, and validation.
  • Keep shared registries, migrations, global docs, and generated artifacts serialized unless one integrator owns them.
  • Prefer worktrees for parallel write lanes when the harness supports them.
  • Add watchdog rules for long-running teams: idle timeout, blocked-task escalation, and stop-on-conflict.
  • Dynamic scaling is allowed only by explicit need: add roles for uncovered risk, remove roles once they stop adding evidence.
  • No upstream runtime, tmux layer, mailbox, hook daemon, installer, or generated .claude/agents/.claude/skills files are required by this skill.
  • Native team spawning exists only when a separate runtime such as the OMC plugin is installed; this repo provides markdown guidance, not that runtime.

Outputs

Team architecture note, role briefs, task ownership table, handoffs, integrated patch or docs, validation evidence, and an orchestration retrospective.

Failure modes

  • Spawning a team for tiny/small work where solo flow is faster and safer.
  • Workers editing shared files, registries, or references without one integrator.
  • Authoring and approval happening in the same lane (self-approval).
  • Handoffs that omit validation status or rejected options.
  • Documenting upstream runtime behavior as if Vibe Coding OS can enforce it.
  • Adding roles that duplicate each other and produce noise instead of evidence.

Verification checklist

  • Team pattern selected and justified.
  • Domain analysis completed before role assignment.
  • Write scopes and integrator are explicit.
  • Review/test lanes are separate from authoring lanes.
  • Dry-run validation found no obvious coordination gap.
  • Final integrated result was verified, not only per-agent outputs.
  • Attribution says inspiration-only; no upstream text/code/runtime was copied.

Related artifacts

  • commands/vibe-team.md
  • templates/team-architecture-template.md
  • docs/workflows/team-agent-orchestration.md
  • skills/core/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md
  • docs/workflows/adaptive-flow.md

Constitution alignment

This skill keeps teams proportional, accountable, original, and verified. It adapts orchestration ideas as markdown guidance only; it does not vendor or require any upstream engine.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.