deprecation-migration
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Manage the lifecycle of deprecating skills, commands, templates, registry entries, or any Vibe Coding OS artifact — distinguishing Compulsory deprecations (security breaks, irrecoverable errors) from Advisory deprecations (replacement available, convenience deprecation). Enforce a 5-question pre-deprecation gate and a structured sunset timeline that protects users from silent breakage. Use when an artifact (skill, command, template, registry entry, schema, API contract, external dependency) is being replaced, removed, or marked end-of-life. Triggers include:
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dmoreq/precepttheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- dmoreq/agent-grimoiretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- int2t05/engineering-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- techmefr/mentistheir own version, first seen Sep 11, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- int2t05/engineering-skills★ 3same name
- dmoreq/agent-grimoire★ 0same name
- dmoreq/precept★ 0same name
- techmefr/mentis★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository117 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- advanced-orchestrationSkill
- architect-agentSkill
- implementer-agentSkill
- quality-councilSkill
- reviewer-agentSkill
- tester-agentSkill
- writer-critic-pairSkill
- authoring-skillsSkill
- api-endpoint-qualitySkill
- async-job-qualitySkill
- auth-qualitySkill
- db-migration-qualitySkill
- frontend-state-qualitySkill
- acceptance-criteriaSkill
- adaptive-flowSkill
- adaptive-prompt-selectionSkill
- adversarial-code-reviewSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brownfield-spec-enhancementSkill
- bug-fix-lifecycleSkill
- checkpoint-validationSkill
- cicd-integrationSkill
- clarify-before-codeSkill
- claude-code-hooks-packSkill
- code-context-packSkill
- code-intelligence-reviewSkill
- context-policySkill
- context-rich-implementationSkill
- crash-proof-planningSkill
- critique-pass-protocolSkill
- dependency-aware-task-orderingSkill
- disciplined-diagnosisSkill
- docs-authorSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- external-skillSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- git-guardrailsSkill
- goal-driven-executionSkill
- grill-user-before-buildingSkill
- guard-bypass-protocolSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- incremental-reviewSkill
- issue-slicingSkill
- lessons-learned-dbSkill
- loop-engineeringSkill
- model-aware-configSkill
- model-weakness-memorySkill
- multi-repo-learningSkill
- orchestration-workflowsSkill
- plan-driven-executionSkill
- plan-from-specSkill
- prd-from-contextSkill
- project-constitutionSkill
- prompt-architectureSkill
- prototype-before-commitmentSkill
- quality-engineSkill
- quality-execution-contractSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Use when an artifact (skill, command, template, registry entry, schema, API contract, external dependency) is being replaced, removed, or …
- Distinctive: line 38
Apply the 5 pre-deprecation questions: Before marking ANY artifact as deprecated, answer ALL 5:
- Very specific: line 47
Document the deprecation notice: Use a ## Deprecation section in the skill/command file with: target, reason, replacement, migration path, …
- Very specific: line 48
Mark the artifact: Add status: "deprecated" to the relevant registry entry, add a ## Deprecation section to the skill/command file with …
- Very specific: line 50
Communicate: Add entry to CHANGELOG.md under ### Deprecated.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: Deprecation & Migration
Purpose
Manage the lifecycle of deprecating skills, commands, templates, registry entries, or any Vibe Coding OS artifact — distinguishing Compulsory deprecations (security breaks, irrecoverable errors) from Advisory deprecations (replacement available, convenience deprecation). Enforce a 5-question pre-deprecation gate and a structured sunset timeline that protects users from silent breakage.
When to use
Use when an artifact (skill, command, template, registry entry, schema, API contract, external dependency) is being replaced, removed, or marked end-of-life. Triggers include:
- Replacing an existing skill/command with a better-designed one
- Marking a registry entry as deprecated due to a security issue
- Sunset a template that no longer reflects current best practice
- Removing a feature that has been superseded
- Communicating an end-of-life timeline to users
Inputs
- Target artifact (path or identifier)
- Reason for deprecation (security, replacement, redundancy, end-of-life)
- Replacement artifact (if any)
- Migration path (steps users must take)
- Severity classification (compulsory vs advisory)
Workflow
- Apply the 5 pre-deprecation questions. Before marking ANY artifact as deprecated, answer ALL 5:
- System value — what does this artifact still provide that the replacement does not?
- Consumers — who depends on this artifact? (count, criticality, migration effort)
- Replacement — what is the replacement, and is it fully feature-equivalent? (gaps documented)
- Migration cost — what is the cost for consumers to migrate? (lines of config, steps, risk)
- Maintenance cost of NOT deprecating — what ongoing cost (bug surface, doc burden, support load) is the project paying to keep this artifact alive?
- Classify severity.
- Compulsory — security vulnerability, irrecoverable error, license violation, irreplaceable dependency failure. NOT an option; users MUST migrate by sunset date. Notice period: minimum 2 minor versions OR 30 days, whichever is longer.
- Advisory — replacement available, redundancy cleanup, end-of-life of a convenience feature. Users SHOULD migrate; no forced deadline. Notice period: minimum 1 minor version OR 14 days.
- Document the deprecation notice. Use a
## Deprecationsection in the skill/command file with: target, reason, replacement, migration path, severity, sunset date, contact. - Mark the artifact. Add
status: "deprecated"to the relevant registry entry, add a## Deprecationsection to the skill/command file with severity, replacement, sunset date, and migration link. - Add the deprecation gate. During validation, surface a warning (advisory) or error (compulsory) for any reference to a deprecated artifact. Track in
registry/deprecation-tracker.json(orregistry/sources.jsonextension). - Communicate. Add entry to
CHANGELOG.mdunder### Deprecated. For compulsory deprecations, also update README, layer READMEs, and any docs that reference the artifact. - Sunset. On sunset date, remove the artifact (or set
status: "sunset"for compulsory migrations with a transitional grace period). Update the deprecation tracker.
Outputs
## Deprecationsection in target fileregistry/deprecation-tracker.jsonentry (or extension toregistry/sources.json)- Updated
CHANGELOG.md - For compulsory: updated README + layer READMEs + adapter docs
## Deprecationsection in the target file- Validation gate updates
Failure modes
- Deprecating without a replacement (users stranded)
- Marking compulsory when advisory would suffice (panic; users revolt)
- Marking advisory when compulsory is required (security incident)
- Sunset date without notice period (silent breakage)
- Deprecation notice without migration path (users cannot comply)
- Removing the artifact before sunset date (premature)
- Failing to track which consumers are affected (no migration telemetry)
Common rationalizations to reject
| Rationalization | Why it's wrong | Counter |
| "Nobody uses it, we can just remove it" | You don't know that without measurement. | Check usage telemetry or run a deprecation notice. |
| "It's a security issue, remove it now" | Security issues still need a notice period; users need migration time. | Compulsory with 2-version/30-day notice minimum. |
| "The replacement is better, no need to document the gaps" | Replacement gaps are why users resist migration. | Document gaps in the deprecation notice. |
| "We'll deprecate it, but never actually remove it" | Deprecation without sunset is debt accumulation. | Set a hard sunset date in the notice. |
| "The migration is trivial" | Trivial for you ≠ trivial for users with custom configs. | Provide a one-command migration path or script. |
| "Just a template, not worth a notice" | Templates still appear in user workflows; breakage cascades. | Even templates get a deprecation entry. |
| "Advisory deprecation, no need to track" | Untracked advisories become silent debt. | Track all deprecations in the registry. |
Red flags (must produce remediation)
- Compulsory deprecation without 2-version/30-day notice
- Advisory deprecation with no sunset date
- Deprecation notice without migration path
- Removing the artifact before sunset date
- No
registry/deprecation-tracker.jsonentry CHANGELOG.mdnot updated- README/layer-READMEs reference a deprecated artifact without the deprecation note
Verification checklist
- All 5 pre-deprecation questions answered
- Severity classified (compulsory vs advisory) with justification
## Deprecationsection in target file with severity, replacement, sunset date- Artifact marked with
status: "deprecated"in registry CHANGELOG.mdupdated under### Deprecated- For compulsory: README + layer READMEs + adapter docs updated
registry/deprecation-tracker.json(or extension) has the entry- Validation gate warns (advisory) or errors (compulsory) on references
- Sunset date set and communicated
Source alignment
Inspired by addyosmani/agent-skills deprecation-and-migration category (MIT, verified 2026-06-20). Adapted into Vibe Coding OS with original wording, Compulsory/Advisory classification, 5-question pre-deprecation gate, and bilingual maintainability notes. The skill is intentionally framework-agnostic — it applies to any artifact (skill, command, template, registry, schema) in Vibe Coding OS and generalizes to any framework following the same artifact pattern.
Ghi chú tiếng Việt
Trước khi deprecate BẤT KỲ artifact nào (skill, command, template, registry, schema), phải trả lời 5 câu hỏi ở workflow step 1. Phân loại severity: Compulsory (security break, irrecoverable error) cần tối thiểu 2 minor versions hoặc 30 ngày notice; Advisory (replacement sẵn, redundancy cleanup) cần tối thiểu 1 minor version hoặc 14 ngày. Mọi deprecation PHẢI có migration path rõ ràng — không có nghĩa là "người dùng tự biết". Tracking trong registry/deprecation-tracker.json (hoặc extension của registry/sources.json). Validation gate phải warn (advisory) hoặc error (compulsory) khi reference đến deprecated artifact.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

