agentleFS
roronoazoroshao369roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-os/skills/core/checkpoint-validation/SKILL.md

checkpoint-validation

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Validate that each workflow phase (constitution, spec, plan, tasks, implementation) is sound before the next begins, providing an explicit implementation-readiness gate. Use at every phase boundary in spec-driven work, and especially before starting implementation, to confirm the prior phase met its acceptance criteria. The artifact produced by the current phase, its acceptance criteria, the project constitution, and the checkpoint template. 1. Identify the current phase and its required exit criteria. 2. Check the artifact against the checklist for that phase…

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use at every phase boundary in spec-driven work, and especially before starting implementation, to confirm the prior phase met its …

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    Check the artifact against the checklist for that phase (e.g., spec has observable acceptance criteria.

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    If criteria fail, stop and return to the phase.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    If criteria pass, record the gate as cleared and proceed.

    line 36
  5. Very specific:

    Not applied: upstream CLI checks or command names.

    line 63

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Checkpoint Validation

Purpose

Validate that each workflow phase (constitution, spec, plan, tasks, implementation) is sound before the next begins, providing an explicit implementation-readiness gate.

When to use

Use at every phase boundary in spec-driven work, and especially before starting implementation, to confirm the prior phase met its acceptance criteria.

Inputs

The artifact produced by the current phase, its acceptance criteria, the project constitution, and the checkpoint template.

Workflow

  1. Identify the current phase and its required exit criteria.
  2. Check the artifact against the checklist for that phase (e.g., spec has observable acceptance criteria; plan has traceability; tasks have dependencies).
  3. Record evidence: what was checked, the result, and any open issues.
  4. If criteria fail, stop and return to the phase; do not advance.
  5. If criteria pass, record the gate as cleared and proceed.
  6. For the implementation gate, confirm the spec, plan, and tasks are all green before any code is written.

Outputs

A completed checkpoint record (templates/checkpoint-template.md) marking the gate as passed or failed, with evidence and follow-ups.

Failure modes

  • Phases advance without meeting exit criteria.
  • The gate is performed but evidence is not recorded.
  • Implementation starts before the readiness gate clears.
  • Checks are subjective rather than tied to acceptance criteria.

Verification checklist

  • Exit criteria for the phase are explicit.
  • Each criterion is checked with recorded evidence.
  • Failures block advancement.
  • The implementation-readiness gate is honored.

Applied / Not Applied

  • Applied: checkpoint validation between phases and the implementation-readiness gate from github/spec-kit.
  • Not applied: upstream CLI checks or command names. Gates are documented local checklists composed with npm run validate / npm run validate:references where relevant.

Ghi chú tiếng Việt

Kiểm tra từng pha đạt tiêu chí trước khi sang pha sau; cổng quan trọng nhất là implementation-readiness (spec/plan/tasks đều đạt mới được code). Ghi bằng chứng, fail thì quay lại. Liên kết: skills/core/acceptance-criteria/SKILL.md, skills/core/verification-before-done/SKILL.md, templates/checkpoint-template.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.