cicd-integration
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Integrate Vibe Coding OS quality gates into GitHub Actions for automated PR checks, reusable composite actions, and weekly quality trend reports. Automate quality verification in CI/CD pipelines so every pull request runs validate:all, emits quality telemetry, and surfaces results as PR comments and annotations. This skill covers the PR quality gate workflow, the reusable composite action, and the weekly quality report workflow. CI/CD integration is markdown-first and pipeline-local. It does not require a daemon, hosted service, or runtime expansion. Quality…
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- murphytrueman/design-system-opstheir own version, first seen Sep 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- murphytrueman/design-system-ops★ 197same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository117 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- advanced-orchestrationSkill
- architect-agentSkill
- implementer-agentSkill
- quality-councilSkill
- reviewer-agentSkill
- tester-agentSkill
- writer-critic-pairSkill
- authoring-skillsSkill
- api-endpoint-qualitySkill
- async-job-qualitySkill
- auth-qualitySkill
- db-migration-qualitySkill
- frontend-state-qualitySkill
- acceptance-criteriaSkill
- adaptive-flowSkill
- adaptive-prompt-selectionSkill
- adversarial-code-reviewSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brownfield-spec-enhancementSkill
- bug-fix-lifecycleSkill
- checkpoint-validationSkill
- clarify-before-codeSkill
- claude-code-hooks-packSkill
- code-context-packSkill
- code-intelligence-reviewSkill
- context-policySkill
- context-rich-implementationSkill
- crash-proof-planningSkill
- critique-pass-protocolSkill
- dependency-aware-task-orderingSkill
- deprecation-migrationSkill
- disciplined-diagnosisSkill
- docs-authorSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- external-skillSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- git-guardrailsSkill
- goal-driven-executionSkill
- grill-user-before-buildingSkill
- guard-bypass-protocolSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- incremental-reviewSkill
- issue-slicingSkill
- lessons-learned-dbSkill
- loop-engineeringSkill
- model-aware-configSkill
- model-weakness-memorySkill
- multi-repo-learningSkill
- orchestration-workflowsSkill
- plan-driven-executionSkill
- plan-from-specSkill
- prd-from-contextSkill
- project-constitutionSkill
- prompt-architectureSkill
- prototype-before-commitmentSkill
- quality-engineSkill
- quality-execution-contractSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 52
Secrets in logs: avoid printing credentials to workflow logs.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CI/CD Integration
Integrate Vibe Coding OS quality gates into GitHub Actions for automated PR checks, reusable composite actions, and weekly quality trend reports.
Purpose
Automate quality verification in CI/CD pipelines so every pull request runs validate:all, emits quality telemetry, and surfaces results as PR comments and annotations. This skill covers the PR quality gate workflow, the reusable composite action, and the weekly quality report workflow.
When to use
- You want every PR to automatically run repository validation, injection scan, secret scan, and quality engine gates.
- You want a reusable GitHub composite action that other repos can reference to run Vibe Coding OS quality gates.
- You want a weekly quality report that opens a GitHub issue with session metrics and trend data.
- You want
vibe-ci-quality-summaryto post or update a PR comment with structured quality results.
Inputs
- GitHub repository with Vibe Coding OS installed and
npm run validate:allpassing locally. - GitHub Actions enabled with workflow write permission for checks and PR comments.
- Optional: quality engine profile (
lean,standard,heavy) for gate selection. - Optional: telemetry data under
docs/metrics/for weekly report generation.
Workflow
- Add the PR quality gate — copy
.github/workflows/vibe-quality-gate.ymlinto the target repository. - Customize gates per project — choose preset profiles or use the reusable composite action at
.github/actions/vibe-quality-action/action.yml. - Configure the weekly report — copy
.github/workflows/vibe-quality-report.ymlto generate automated weekly trend issues. - Run
vibe-ci-quality-summary— generate and post a PR quality summary as a bot comment, including gate status, timing breakdown, and fix recommendations. - Review annotations — failed gates emit GitHub annotations inline in the changed file diff.
Outputs
- PR quality gate workflow that runs validate:all and uploads a quality report artifact.
- Reusable composite action that other repos can reference with
uses:. - Weekly quality report opened as a GitHub issue.
- PR comment quality summary rendered by
vibe-ci-quality-summary.
Failure modes
- Missing dependencies: workflow fails because
npm cicannot resolve packages — ensurepackage-lock.jsonis committed. - Secrets in logs: avoid printing credentials to workflow logs; the built-in secret scan is intentionally included.
- False-positive secret scan: review detector patterns in
scripts/validate-secrets.mjsand add exclusions where appropriate. - Report artifact missing: confirm
scripts/quality-engine.mjsandscripts/quality-engine-report.mjsexist; the workflow includes a fallback summary.
Verification checklist
.github/workflows/vibe-quality-gate.ymlrunsnpm run validate:allandnpm run validate:secrets.- Quality report is uploaded as a workflow artifact on every run.
- PR comment is posted or updated with quality summary.
- Weekly report workflow opens a GitHub issue with trend data.
- Reusable action passes inputs and produces valid outputs.
- No credentials, tokens, or secrets appear in workflow logs.
- All gates pass before merge (
validate:all26/26).
Related assets
- Command:
commands/vibe-ci-quality-summary.md - Guide:
docs/cicd-integration-guide.md - Workflow:
.github/workflows/vibe-quality-gate.yml - Workflow:
.github/workflows/vibe-quality-report.yml - Action:
.github/actions/vibe-quality-action/action.yml
Notes
CI/CD integration is markdown-first and pipeline-local. It does not require a daemon, hosted service, or runtime expansion. Quality gates and report generation are composable and referenceable from any GitHub Actions workflow.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

