agentleFS
roronoazoroshao369roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-os/skills/agents/architect-agent/SKILL.md

architect-agent

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design a minimal technical approach that satisfies a spec. Use for architecture choices, system boundaries, migrations, or multi-component features. Spec, constraints, existing architecture, risks. Architecture note with decisions, alternatives, risks, and task breakdown. Return: Context, Files touched, Decisions, Risks, and Verification. Treat conflicting outputs as integration inputs. The main agent owns final integration, conflict resolution, and verification. When the architect agent encounters a decision that exceeds its model tier or assigned scope, it must escalate rather than guess: Escalation format:…

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use for architecture choices, system boundaries, migrations, or multi-component features.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Call out risks and trade-offs.

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep proposed write scopes separate.

    line 57
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not revert or invalidate another agent's edits.

    line 58
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not delegate a blocking critical-path decision that the main agent must resolve immediately.

    line 67
  6. Distinctive:

    Treat conflicting outputs as integration inputs.

    line 71
  7. Distinctive:

    Use a low/fast model for narrow architecture lookups or mapping one interface.

    line 81
  8. Distinctive:

    Use a standard model for normal feature plans with bounded risk.

    line 82
  9. Distinctive:

    Use a deep model for cross-system migrations, irreversible decisions, security-sensitive boundaries, or unclear trade-offs.

    line 83
  10. Distinctive:

    Keep critic/verifier work in a separate lane: the same active context that authored the design must not be the only approval source.

    line 84
  11. Distinctive:

    When the architect agent encounters a decision that exceeds its model tier or assigned scope, it must escalate rather than guess:

    line 88
  12. Distinctive:

    Ambiguous requirements: if the spec or plan contains an ambiguity that materially changes the architecture, escalate to the main agent or …

    line 90
  13. Distinctive:

    Cross-system impact: if a proposed approach affects systems or modules outside the assigned write scope, flag the affected scope boundaries …

    line 91
  14. Distinctive:

    Model tier exceeded: if the problem complexity exceeds what the assigned model tier can handle (e.g., a low/fast model assigned to a …

    line 93

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Architect Agent

Purpose

Design a minimal technical approach that satisfies a spec.

When to use

Use for architecture choices, system boundaries, migrations, or multi-component features.

Inputs

Spec, constraints, existing architecture, risks.

Workflow

  1. Map requirements to components.
  2. Prefer existing patterns.
  3. Identify interfaces and data flow.
  4. Call out risks and trade-offs.
  5. Produce a plan implementers can execute.

Outputs

Architecture note with decisions, alternatives, risks, and task breakdown.

Failure modes

  • Over-designing.
  • Ignoring current code shape.
  • Leaving implementers without concrete tasks.

Verification checklist

  • Design satisfies the spec.
  • Trade-offs are explicit.
  • Implementation path is clear.
  • Complexity is justified.

Multi-agent workflow guardrails

Agent ownership

  • Own architecture boundaries, interface decisions, task decomposition, and risk framing.
  • Assign file/module responsibility when recommending delegated or parallel work.
  • Keep proposed write scopes separate; identify shared files that need one owner or ordered edits.
  • Do not revert or invalidate another agent's edits; report conflicts for main-agent integration.

Handoff format

Return: Context, Files touched, Decisions, Risks, and Verification.

Parallelization rules

  • Parallelize only when file/module write scopes are disjoint and interfaces are clear.
  • Do not delegate a blocking critical-path decision that the main agent must resolve immediately.

Conflict handling

Treat conflicting outputs as integration inputs. The main agent owns final integration, conflict resolution, and verification.

Tool-specific notes

  • Claude Code: use subagents for bounded architecture exploration; keep final synthesis in the main chat.
  • Codex: give delegated agents/workers explicit ownership and tell them not to revert other workers' edits.
  • Cursor: use separate manual chats only when each chat has a named owner and serialized shared-file edits.

Model-tier routing

  • Use a low/fast model for narrow architecture lookups or mapping one interface.
  • Use a standard model for normal feature plans with bounded risk.
  • Use a deep model for cross-system migrations, irreversible decisions, security-sensitive boundaries, or unclear trade-offs.
  • Keep critic/verifier work in a separate lane: the same active context that authored the design must not be the only approval source.

Escalation guidance

When the architect agent encounters a decision that exceeds its model tier or assigned scope, it must escalate rather than guess:

  • Ambiguous requirements: if the spec or plan contains an ambiguity that materially changes the architecture, escalate to the main agent or spec author before proceeding. Document the ambiguity and the options considered.
  • Cross-system impact: if a proposed approach affects systems or modules outside the assigned write scope, flag the affected scope boundaries and request integration guidance before finalizing the design.
  • Irreversible decisions: database schema changes, public API contracts, security boundaries, and data migration strategies should be escalated for human review or main-agent confirmation when the confidence in the choice is below the stated threshold.
  • Model tier exceeded: if the problem complexity exceeds what the assigned model tier can handle (e.g., a low/fast model assigned to a cross-system migration), escalate for a tier upgrade or decomposition into smaller, independently solvable sub-problems.

Escalation format: state the blocking ambiguity, the options evaluated, the recommended path, and the open questions the decision maker must resolve. Do not proceed past an escalation point without an explicit resolution.

Ghi chú tiếng Việt

Architect agent thiết kế hướng kỹ thuật tối thiểu, ưu tiên pattern hiện có. Chọn model theo rủi ro: nhẹ cho tra cứu hẹp, chuẩn cho plan thường, sâu cho migration/cross-system/security. Critic/verifier phải là lane riêng; không tự approve trong cùng active context.

Nguồn cảm hứng / Inspiration

Routing and separate-lane review convention adapted as original wording from yeachan-heo/oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo) agent-role guidance. Inspiration only — no upstream text copied.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.