agentleFS
SamuelNDCESamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library/skills/agent-ai-engineering/team-agent-orchestration/SKILL.md

team-agent-orchestration

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run team-based orchestration for agent squads using work items, ownership, agent Kanban, merge gates, and control pane handoffs.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Use this skill when agents are being managed like a team rather than a single assistant.

    line 9
  2. Common:

    Treat every agent as a teammate with a narrow contract:

    line 20
  3. Common:

    Use agent Kanban when work must be visible across sessions.

    line 30
  4. Very specific:

    Extract reusable skill: if the card pattern repeats, promote it into skills/.

    line 70
  5. Common:

    Do not add more automation until the operator can answer: who owns this, what changed, what gate failed, and what can safely merge?

    line 83
  6. Common:

    When a card needs dynamic workflow mode:

    line 87
  7. Common:

    Put the task-local harness under the card owner.

    line 89

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Team Agent Orchestration

Use this skill when agents are being managed like a team rather than a single assistant. The purpose is to make team-based orchestration reliable: clear work items, explicit ownership, agent Kanban state, branch isolation, control pane visibility, and merge gates.

When To Activate

  • The task spans multiple agents, tools, harnesses, branches, or worktrees.
  • The user mentions team orchestration, agent Kanban, squad, conductor, control pane, manager, desktop app, Zellij, tmux, Hermes, Devin, Codex, Claude Code, or multi-agent work.
  • A project needs shared workflow state across people and agents.
  • Existing agent fan-out is producing output but not mergeable product.

Operating Model

Treat every agent as a teammate with a narrow contract:

  • Owner: the person or agent accountable for the work item.
  • Scope: files, branch, tool surface, and forbidden areas.
  • State: backlog, ready, running, review, blocked, merged, or archived.
  • Evidence: tests, screenshots, logs, review notes, or eval reports.
  • Merge gate: the exact condition that allows integration.

Agent Kanban

Use agent Kanban when work must be visible across sessions.

ColumnMeaningExit Criteria
BacklogCandidate work item, not yet shapedAcceptance criteria written
ReadyShaped and assignableOwner and branch/worktree assigned
RunningAgent is actively workingHandoff artifact and changed files exist
ReviewWork is complete but not mergedTests, diff review, and risk check pass
BlockedNeeds external input or failed gateBlocker has owner and next action
MergedIntegrated into mainlinePR merged or local main updated
ArchivedNo longer relevantReason recorded

Each card should fit this schema:

{
  "id": "agent-card-001",
  "title": "Build dynamic workflow skill",
  "owner": "codex",
  "state": "running",
  "branch": "product/dynamic-workflow-team-orchestration",
  "worktree": ".",
  "acceptance": [
    "Skill exists",
    "Tests cover required concepts",
    "Content artifact contains video and article angles"
  ],
  "merge_gate": "lint, focused tests, and catalog check pass",
  "handoff": "path/to/handoff.md"
}

Team-Based Orchestration Flow

  1. Shape the board: convert fuzzy ambition into work items with owners and merge gates.
  2. Pick execution mode: single-agent, dynamic workflow mode, dmux/tmux, worktree fan-out, or external desktop orchestrator.
  3. Assign boundaries: one owner per card, clear file scope, and no overlapping writes without an integrator.
  4. Run agents: each agent writes evidence and handoff notes, not just code.
  5. Review in sequence: tests first, then diff review, then security/risk checks, then content/product polish.
  6. Merge deliberately: one integrator resolves conflicts and updates the control pane or status artifact.
  7. Extract reusable skill: if the card pattern repeats, promote it into skills/.

Control Pane Requirements

A useful control pane for team orchestration should show:

  • Active work items and their agent Kanban state.
  • Owner, harness, branch, worktree, and last heartbeat.
  • Links to handoff artifacts, tests, screenshots, and PRs.
  • Blockers grouped by owner and unblock action.
  • Merge readiness by gate, not vibes.
  • Reusable workflow candidates that should become shared skills.

Do not add more automation until the operator can answer: who owns this, what changed, what gate failed, and what can safely merge?

Dynamic Workflow Compatibility

When a card needs dynamic workflow mode:

  • Put the task-local harness under the card owner.
  • Store inputs and outputs on the card.
  • Require an eval before moving from Running to Review.
  • Promote the harness to a shared skill only after repeat use.

Failure Modes To Watch

  • Agent soup: many agents running, no owner or merge gate.
  • Invisible work: useful output exists only in a chat transcript.
  • Board theater: a Kanban board exists but cards have no acceptance criteria.
  • Overlapping writes: parallel agents edit the same files without worktrees.
  • No product artifact: the process produces docs but no runnable or publishable surface.

Output Standard

Finish each orchestration pass with:

  • Board/card changes.
  • Merged or pending branches.
  • Tests and eval evidence.
  • Blockers with owner and next action.
  • New shared skill candidates.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.