reverse-engineer-anything
Skill0 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub
Reverse engineer native, managed, Electron/JavaScript, packaged, firmware, and browser targets with REA. Use shipped-artifact or requested runtime evidence to explain features, compare versions, decompile code, or guide a reconstruction. Skip REA for ordinary source-repository architecture analysis.
28 other projects use a version of this, 19 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thistleknot/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- malinskibeniamin/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yanzyuyu/min-tokedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Stijnus/dsh-rev-engedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AxlZero21/Skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yht-4403/jc-agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use rea-changelog-update, rea-ci-tests-audit and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
morlutoSkillrea-changelog-update
Prepare or rewrite REA release changelogs and GitHub release notes from pinned Git history, with verified contributor thanks and Release Please synchronization.
Also in 8 projects that use this
Prompt-MotionSkillrea-ci-tests-audit
Audit REA CI and test suites for correctness, fixture drift, false passes, and measured performance; use for suite or workflow investigations and efficiency changes, rather than ordinary feature testing or a single test failure.
Also in 7 projects that use this
kinqsradioSkillrea-analysis-optimization
Optimize a measured REA analysis bottleneck while preserving evidence and resource ownership; scoped to REA.
Also in 5 projects that use this
morlutoSkillrea-tool-design
Audit, investigate, design, or change REA investigation tools, CLI/MCP contracts, provider capabilities, and Evidence semantics.
Also in 8 projects that use this
photon-groveSkillunslop
Detects and rewrites generic, overly polished, or AI-sounding prose while preserving meaning. Use when the user asks to "unslop", humanize, de-AI, tighten, or review whether writing sounds generated.
Also in 4 projects that use this
StrayDragonSkillui-ux-pro-max
UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions28 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- iSaluki/uncreep★ 1100% same
- ZeroTokenClaw/agents-skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 19
- morluto/rea★ 442k19% same
- mxyhi/ok-skills★ 51119% same
- codetesla51/skills★ 3275% same
- laaielichter/Reverseport★ 1842% same
- komluk/scaffolding★ 1648% same
- mxrsv/agents-skills★ 1154% same
- ZeyuLing/research_autocode_skills★ 949% same
- BJ1919810/dsh-rea★ 471% same
- Prompt-Motion/ReaReverse★ 454% same
- zheedevVn/Rea-Unlock★ 448% same
9 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 7
- felvieira/claude-skills-fv★ 27same name
- kinqsradio/orbyn-fullstack-skills★ 4same name
- malinskibeniamin/skills★ 4same name
- orbyn-dev/orbyn-fullstack-skills★ 4same name
- psyb0t/docker-reverse-engineer-anything★ 4same name
- jahongashtamc/hallwright★ 1same name
- OfficialTanishSharma/reverse-engineer-anything★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-workflowsSkill
- aio-agentsSkill
- aio-algorithmsSkill
- aio-apiSkill
- aio-architectureSkill
- aio-autoplanSkill
- aio-benchmarkSkill
- aio-brainstormSkill
- aio-canarySkill
- aio-checkpointSkill
- aio-ciSkill
- aio-commitSkill
- aio-compoundSkill
- aio-dataSkill
- aio-debugSkill
- aio-devex-reviewSkill
- aio-doc-reviewSkill
- aio-explainSkill
- aio-feedbackSkill
- aio-handoffSkill
- aio-ideateSkill
- aio-observeSkill
- aio-optimizeSkill
- aio-pipelinesSkill
- aio-plan-reviewSkill
- aio-planSkill
- aio-proofSkill
- aio-prototypeSkill
- aio-qa-onlySkill
- aio-qaSkill
- aio-releaseSkill
- aio-resumeSkill
- aio-reviewSkill
- aio-securitySkill
- aio-shipSkill
- aio-simplifySkill
- aio-specSkill
- aio-tddSkill
- aio-test-auditSkill
- aio-testSkill
- aio-verifySkill
- aio-workSkill
- aio-worktreeSkill
- all-in-oneSkill
- apple-appstore-reviewerSkill
- backend-algorithmsSkill
- backend-debugSkill
- backend-pipelinesSkill
- backend-planSkill
- backend-reviewSkill
- backend-verifySkill
- complete-destructionSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- play-policy-insightsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 3 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 11
Use REA when a claim depends on a shipped binary or package, decompilation, passive application runtime evidence, or comparison with …
- Common: line 22
If REA tools are available and their registration is not known to be stale, proceed directly to the target.
- Common: line 29
If tools are absent, a call is blocked by the client, or a required provider is unavailable, read connection and recovery.
- Very specific: line 35
Prefer an existing rea CLI.
- Distinctive: line 105
If the user says only "my app" without a name, path, or target already selected for this task, ask which app before searching for artifacts.
- Very specific: line 119
Start with the default result and use its inline Evidence and graph context.
- Very specific: line 131
If MCP reports resource_constraint with details.resource: "transport", call inspect_analysis_view with its reported same-session Evidence …
- Very specific: line 139
When the retained parent ID is unknown, use get_evidence_bundle with detail: "summary" and exact filters for operation, target SHA-256, …
- Distinctive: line 157
Every conclusion must distinguish observations, inferences, and unknowns.
- Distinctive: line 178
Start with the smallest useful overview or inventory.
- Distinctive: line 194
Keep a concise finding ledger linking each conclusion to Evidence IDs, confidence/evidence type, search boundary, and remaining unknowns.
- Distinctive: line 198
Before finishing, revisit the original checklist.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
REA
Use REA when a claim depends on a shipped binary or package, decompilation, passive application runtime evidence, or comparison with behavior not established by available source. For ordinary analysis of a complete source repository, use normal repository tools and do not run REA readiness or provider commands.
Connect only when needed
Installing this skill supplies instructions; it does not register the REA MCP server, install analysis engines, or add tools to an already-running agent.
If REA tools are available and their registration is not known to be stale, proceed directly to the target. Do not run diagnostics or setup before every investigation. Use the connected server's actual tool list and input schemas; a skill installed from repository main may describe capabilities absent from an older npm release. Keep complete inline Evidence when that server does not advertise retained references.
If tools are absent, a call is blocked by the client, or a required provider is unavailable, read connection and recovery. Diagnose the observed blocker, continue useful supported work, and resume the original task after repair. Client approval, shell PATH, registration and engine availability have different remedies; avoid repeating setup for all of them.
Prefer an existing rea CLI. When none is installed and REA package acquisition
is within the authorized scope, use npx -y rea-agents@6.4.0 in its place.
Configuration repair starts with a read-only setup plan; show paths, backups and
skill replacement before applying authorized changes. Preserve existing approval
and target-execution boundaries. REA setup never installs or upgrades unrelated
software, including Node.js, npm, Homebrew, Java, Ghidra, IDA, JADX, Binwalk or Unblob.
Route the target first
Choose the first tool from the target the user supplied. Use open_binary for
active-target native or archive workflows; target-free tools take their own
explicit path or endpoint and do not need it.
- ASAR or extracted JavaScript/Electron tree:
analyze_javascript_application. - Archive/package member inventory (ZIP/APK/IPA/MSIX/AppX or DMG):
open_binarywith the supplied local path; useinspect_artifactwhen its graph and findings help answer the question. - Android APK code, classes, methods, or incoming references:
inspect_android_package, then focused Android tools when advertised. Archive member inventory still uses the archive route above. - Managed PE/CLI assembly:
inspect_managed_artifact. - Firmware image:
inspect_firmware_regionswhen advertised. Useextract_firmwarewhen extraction is requested, with a caller-selected new absolute output directory. These tools use caller-supplied Binwalk/Unblob on Linux; see the firmware guide. - .NET NativeAOT PE/ELF: native Ghidra analysis. Native code can yield pseudocode;
consult the NativeAOT workflow in
references/native-and-artifacts.mdfor optional metadata recovery and its supported host/layout boundary. - User-owned browser page already open:
list_browser_targets. - Retained HAR/native mitmproxy capture:
inspect_web_network_capture. Select original record ordinals when useful; inspect producer fields and byte/number sidecars without fetching recorded URLs or claiming live attribution. See historical captures for the exact upstream profile and credential exclusions. - User-owned Electron runtime already open:
list_electron_targets. - Explicit local EVM bytecode carrier:
inspect_evm_interfacewith caller-selectedraworhexencoding. Preserve carrier/decoded digests and treat selectors, argument strings and mutability as inferred candidates; this performs no chain lookup or target execution. See the EVM bytecode guide. - Explicit Linux ELF file for offline layout, symbols, relocations or static
mitigation evidence:
inspect_binary_layout. This target-free operation uses caller-supplied pwntools without opening a disassembler database. Preserve its raw locations and inference/coverage limits; see the offline binary guide. - Supplied Linux x86-64 ELF core:
inspect_recorded_crash. Read every recorded thread, raw note and source-bound register without opening a live target. Historical PIDs do not select live processes. Requestinclude_debugger_contextonly when core-only mapping candidates help; see the recorded crash guide. - PE resource type/name/language trees and static icon group references:
inspect_pe_resourceswith an explicit path. This portable operation requires no active target or engine; opaque payloads retain file ranges and SHA-256. - Native executable, library, or analysis database:
open_binary, then use focused analysis tools directly; callbinary_overviewwhen metadata or inventory context is useful and available from the selected provider.
For an existing IDA MCP configuration, use open_binary with the original
input binary and provider_id: "ida"; do not pass an .idb or .i64 database.
The legacy attached profile binds the already-open GUI input by SHA-256 and
leaves its database open. The modern headless profile creates and closes an
owned private database without saving. Installation and registration reuse
mrexodia/ida-pro-mcp; see the
IDA provider guide.
Proceed directly to analyze_function, pseudocode, or function/string searches
after opening; IDA does not supply binary_overview. Consult session availability
when composing broader workflows. Modern direct callers and unsupported dossier
facets remain unknown; live IDA results are not replayed from snapshots.
If the user says only "my app" without a name, path, or target already selected for this task, ask which app before searching for artifacts. Paths in unrelated saved reports and nearby test fixtures do not select the user's target. Resolve an actual human-readable app name to one clear installed artifact when possible; ask when matches are ambiguous. Never choose an example app on the user's behalf.
In a target-free session, use open_binary to bind any archive/package or
native target whose analysis tool operates on the active target. Do not call an
unadvertised tool; inspect binary_session with {} and its
result.tool_availability for availability reasons and remediation. The tool
list stays complete; availability depends on the operation, target, and host.
Work summary-first
Start with the default result and use its inline Evidence and graph context.
For a JavaScript application or ELF layout whose size is unknown or large,
call analyze_javascript_application or inspect_binary_layout with
"detail": "summary", then inspect the retained parent_evidence_id with
inspect_analysis_view.
Page module identities and select the returned node_id before requesting an
item; a single file path can represent several graph roles. Do not repeat an
identical analysis or rejected call without a changed input or resolved blocker.
Recheck session state when a lifecycle change makes that status useful.
Make a focused follow-up only when the
returned result leaves a specific question unanswered.
If MCP reports resource_constraint with details.resource: "transport", call
inspect_analysis_view with its reported same-session Evidence reference for a
summary, one section/module, or a stable page. Use trace_application_feature
once a seed is known, or call export_evidence_bundle to write the complete
session to a selected path. The analysis remains complete in the ledger; avoid
repeating it merely to request the same oversized response. Complete CLI JSON
output also streams without a single MCP frame.
When the retained parent ID is unknown, use get_evidence_bundle with
detail: "summary" and exact filters for operation, target SHA-256,
analysis-profile digest or canonical procedure address. Select its returned
Evidence ID for the next view instead of requesting the complete bundle.
retention: "complete-record" means the whole record is stored; native
value-flow truncation and unknown metadata remain separate. For an exported
portable bundle, use rea inspect-evidence-bundle with JSON containing path,
detail: "summary" and the same filters. Reading that file still requires
validating its full contents within the local memory budget.
A client can also truncate a successful tool result without a REA transport error. Treat that preview as incomplete; use the retained parent ID for smaller views or export when the full record is needed. Do not parse the preview as canonical JSON or repeat the producer. For JavaScript, read the module-view and trace recipes before drilling into a large graph; a broad bidirectional trace can expand unrelated containment relationships even after summary analysis.
Every conclusion must distinguish observations, inferences, and unknowns. Cite Evidence IDs, preserve limitations and incomplete coverage, and never imply that static analysis observed execution. Runtime requests execute the declared target and lifecycle; do not broaden the target or action beyond those fields.
Within the user's requested investigation, call available analysis tools directly. REA does not require permission grants or per-call approval flags. The agent client can independently require approval. Follow the declared request scope and the host's actual access requirements; use the recovery guide for an observed client-policy rejection.
Plan broader investigations
For requests that span multiple features or subsystems, use a staged workflow:
- Turn the request into a checklist of questions and the evidence each answer needs. Resolve target identity and constraints from the conversation and workspace before asking for information again.
- Inspect the current REA session, artifact identity, saved analysis database, bookmarks, and prior evidence. Reuse matching state; do not open duplicate sessions or repeat identical analysis.
- Start with the smallest useful overview or inventory. Follow each question from its entry point through relevant data and state changes to its result. Batch related operations around a specific hypothesis, then expand only when the returned evidence leaves a concrete gap.
- Inspect relevant packaged resources and configuration alongside code when they affect the question. Use format-aware inventory and parsers; do not infer behavior from filenames, strings, or layout alone.
- Corroborate a conclusion with the evidence type it requires. Use runtime observation only when static evidence cannot answer the question and the required host runtime and OS access are available. For JavaScript behavior, run probes against the actual app through the available browser, Electron, or process capture workflow.
- Decompose work into independent questions. When parallel workers are available and the questions do not depend on one another, assign distinct scopes, point workers to existing evidence, and ask them to return sources, conclusions, and unresolved gaps. Otherwise, work sequentially.
- Keep a concise finding ledger linking each conclusion to Evidence IDs, confidence/evidence type, search boundary, and remaining unknowns. Update the shared index or investigation report so later passes can reuse results.
Before finishing, revisit the original checklist. Mark each question as answered, partially answered, or unresolved based on its evidence; keep bounded negative searches bounded, and do not describe a broad investigation as complete while required questions remain open.
Read only the relevant guide
- Native binaries, managed assemblies, archives, and extraction: references/native-and-artifacts.md
- ASARs, extracted JavaScript, feature tracing, and version comparison: references/javascript-applications.md
- Android APK declarations, classes, methods, and static references: references/android-applications.md
- Passive browser/Electron observation and static/runtime reconciliation: references/runtime-observation.md
- Evidence paging, comparisons, residual unknowns, and verification: references/evidence-workflows.md
Finish the task
Explain findings in plain language and tie them to returned evidence. When the
user asks to build something, use normal coding tools and separate observed
behavior from design choices. Close an opened native session with
close_binary when the investigation is complete.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

