agentleFS
omdenkar2-uiomdenkar2-ui/all-in-one/skills/play-policy-insights/SKILL.md

play-policy-insights

Skill0 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub

Automated auditor designed to verify Android applications against Google Play Policy domains. It cross-references static code analysis with Play Store declarations to generate deterministic compliance reports, identifying undeclared data collection, architectural risks, and missing disclosures across Permissions and APIs Hygiene, User Account and Identity, and Data Safety and Privacy domains.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Execution Mode Awareness: Before starting Phase 2, evaluate if your execution environment provides a tool to spawn or delegate tasks to …

    line 61
  2. Distinctive:

    If YES, you MUST use Mode A (Delegation).

    line 67
  3. Distinctive:

    If NO, use Mode B (Sequential Self-Execution).

    line 69
  4. Distinctive:

    If you use "Mode A (Delegation)", wait for "SUCCESS" confirmation from sub-agents to know when they are done.

    line 75
  5. Very specific:

    Idempotency & Timeout Safeguard: If a sub-agent fails or times out, you MUST verify the presence and integrity of its target output file …

    line 78
  6. Very specific:

    Evaluate goals: If activated_goals is empty, skip to step 3 of Phase 2 (Aggregation).

    line 101
  7. Very specific:

    Read the contents of <temp_dir>/prompt_worker_<goal_name>.md.

    line 145
  8. Very specific:

    Present findings: Run python3 <repo_root>/scripts/generate_report.py <temp_dir>.

    line 167

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Play Policy Insights: data safety, login credentials, and restricted permissions

You must audit Android apps for three specific policy domains. You must check data safety, demo login credentials, and restricted permissions.

Path Resolution

  • repo_root: Absolute path to the directory containing this SKILL.md.
  • app_dir:: Absolute path to the directory containing app's code.
  • temp_dir: Absolute path to the scratch directory at the workspace root. It is located at .scratch/play_policy_insights_<uuid>. Containment Mandate: You must confine all file system writes, intermediate artifacts, and logs strictly to this directory. This ensures the skill remains portable and safe across diverse execution environments, including local harnesses and CI/CD pipelines, by avoiding reliance on system-level temporary paths or user home directories.

Critical mandates

  • Execution Mode Awareness Before starting Phase 2, evaluate if your execution environment provides a tool to spawn or delegate tasks to general-purpose sub-agents (e.g., tools often named invoke_agent, delegate_task, or spawn_worker, using generic agent profiles like 'generalist' or 'coding_agent').
  • If YES, you MUST use Mode A (Delegation).
  • If NO, use Mode B (Sequential Self-Execution). You must read the prompt files intended for the subagents, follow their instructions, and write the expected output files to disk.
  • Sub-agents orchestration:

    • If you use "Mode A (Delegation)", wait for "SUCCESS" confirmation from sub-agents to know when they are done.
    • Idempotency & Timeout Safeguard: If a sub-agent fails or times out, you MUST verify the presence and integrity of its target output file (e.g., <temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json) before retrying. If the file exists and contains valid JSON, treat the execution as SUCCESS and proceed. Otherwise, retry up to three times.
  • Fail-fast mandate: The automated audit in Phase 1 is the source of truth. If orchestrator.py fails, you must stop immediately with an explanation of failure. Do not use manual auditing as a fallback.

The two-phase protocol

Phase 1: Fact gathering and triage

  1. Initialize and triage:
    • Run python3 <repo_root>/scripts/orchestrator.py init <app_dir>.
    • This will create the scratch environment, perform static analysis, map the codebase, identify audit goals, and produce prompts for subagents for each audit goal and prompts for designated critic and aggregator subagents.
    • You must wait (up to 5 minutes) for the script to finish.
  2. Capture environment: Note values of the temp_dir, and activated_goals from the JSON output. You will need them in Phase 2.
  3. Evaluate goals: If activated_goals is empty, skip to step 3 of Phase 2 (Aggregation). Otherwise, proceed to step 1 of Phase 2 (Detailed analysis).

Phase 2: Goal-oriented audit

Determine your execution capabilities and proceed with either Mode A OR Mode B.

Mode A: Orchestrator WITH Delegation Capabilities (Parallel)

  1. Detailed analysis: For each goal in activated_goals (e.g., permissions_and_apis, data_safety_part_1, data_safety_part_2), delegate to a sub-agent. Concurrency Limit: You must not spawn more than 3 sub-agents simultaneously. Spawn the first batch of up to 3, wait for their completions, and then spawn the next batch. Repeat until all goals are complete. Pass the prompt: "Read your instructions from <temp_dir>/prompt_worker_<goal_name>.md and execute. MANDATORY: You must use your file-writing capabilities to save your final JSON findings directly to the file system at <temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json. You are strictly forbidden from outputting the JSON in your chat response. To minimize context usage, your final response must be exactly 'SUCCESS' and nothing else." Validate: Confirm every <temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json exists and contains valid JSON. If a sub-agent fails or times out, but the valid JSON output file is already present on disk, do NOT retry; proceed normally. Only retry the corresponding worker (up to three times) if the file is missing or invalid.
  2. Aggregate Findings: Execute the python aggregation command: python3 <repo_root>/scripts/orchestrator.py aggregate <temp_dir>. This produces aggregated_findings.json and returns a JSON object containing critic_chunks representing the number of chunks to verify (e.g., {"temp_dir": "...", "critic_chunks": 2}).
  3. Parallel Critic review: For each chunk index i from 1 to critic_chunks, delegate to a sub-agent. Concurrency Limit: You must not spawn more than 3 critic sub-agents simultaneously. Batch them in groups of 3 as above. Pass the prompt: "Read your instructions from <temp_dir>/prompt_critic_<i>.md and execute. MANDATORY: You must use your file-writing capabilities to save your final JSON findings directly to the file system at <temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json. You are strictly forbidden from outputting the JSON in your chat response. To minimize context usage, your final response must be exactly 'SUCCESS' and nothing else." Validate: Confirm each <temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json exists and contains valid JSON before proceeding. If it failed or timed out, but the valid JSON file is present, proceed normally. Otherwise, retry that specific critic chunk.
  4. Proceed to Finalization (Step 4 below)

Mode B: Orchestrator WITHOUT Delegation Capabilities (Sequential)

  1. Detailed Analysis: For each goal in activated_goals, sequentially:
    • Read the contents of <temp_dir>/prompt_worker_<goal_name>.md.
    • Execute the instructions contained within that file yourself.
    • CRITICAL: You MUST format your findings exactly as requested in the prompt and save them to <temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json. Do not summarize findings in your thoughts or chat; move to the next task.
    • Validate: Confirm <temp_dir>/worker_<goal_name>.json exists before moving to the next goal.
  2. Aggregate Findings: Execute the python aggregation command: python3 <repo_root>/scripts/orchestrator.py --aggregate <temp_dir>. This produces aggregated_findings.json and returns a JSON object containing critic_chunks representing the number of chunks to verify.
  3. Sequential Critic review: For each chunk index i from 1 to critic_chunks, sequentially:
    • Read the contents of <temp_dir>/prompt_critic_<i>.md.
    • Execute the steps yourself and save your findings to <temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json.
    • Validate: Confirm <temp_dir>/critic_output_<i>.json exists before moving to the next chunk.
  4. Proceed to Finalization (Step 4 below)

Finalization (Both Modes)

  1. Present findings: Run python3 <repo_root>/scripts/generate_report.py <temp_dir>. It will produce <temp_dir>/compliance_report.md. Present this output file to user.
  2. STOP: The audit is complete. Await further instructions.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.