agentleFS
omdenkar2-uiomdenkar2-ui/all-in-one/skills/aio-qa/SKILL.md

aio-qa

Skill0 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub

Explore backend API, CLI, job, worker and webhook behavior, then repair authorized reproducible defects and verify durable outcomes. Use for backend QA, quick QA or replaying a prior regression report; use aio-qa-only for report-only inspection.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Follow the stage contract.

    line 25

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AIO QA

Exercise the selected backend contract and observe actual effects. This stage can diagnose and repair confirmed defects when the user's request authorizes fixes. A report-only request uses AIO QA Only. QA is scoped functional work, not a separate whole-project build or shipment.

Inherit the resource contract, original journal and accepted R/V checks. Use thorough for standalone work. Read QA modes to resolve Full / Quick / Regression exploration separately from Quick / Standard / Exhaustive fix tiers. Defaults are Full exploration and Standard repairs within accepted scope. These names select work; they do not change the resource profile or erase mandatory acceptance.

Protocol

  1. Bind the exact source and selected API, CLI, job, worker or webhook contract. Reuse valid current-source probes. Record user authority, fixtures, expected initial/final state and remaining budget. A command's success or an accepted/enqueued response is insufficient evidence of the final business effect.
  2. Resolve mode conflicts before dependent probes. For Regression, inspect the actual previous report and replay inputs; validate contract, fixture, environment and revision applicability. Previous buggy behavior is not an oracle. Missing prerequisites are explicit coverage gaps; do not silently call a new Full sweep a regression replay.
  3. Use AIO Test and its functional contracts to exercise relevant success, authorization, malformed input, retry, duplicate, concurrency, cancellation and crash/recovery boundaries. Use repository-native tools and disposable environments. Avoid unrequested test-framework installation or external side effects. Require real storage/provider evidence for claims that depend on it.
  4. Retain each observed issue's expected/actual effect, stable finding ID, severity, source, exact reproduction and limits. Inspect failures before assigning product blame; fixture and cleanup defects need their own diagnosis. Report skipped or unavailable checks and unmapped requirements separately.
  5. For authorized fixes within the selected tier, use AIO Debug for a falsifiable cause and TDD for the observed failing regression before implementation. Assess capacity and reserve the run's next repair wave before corrective changes. Combine compatible repairs rather than creating a wave per finding. Respect shared file ownership and at most two aggregate waves across the run.
  6. Rerun affected probes and accepted checks against the actual integrated source. Obtain missing required independent review through the existing controller; current-source matching evidence can be reused. Mandatory blockers cannot be deferred into a green QA result because Quick excluded their fix severity or the budget ended.

Return and handoff

Return selected exploration/tier, tested contracts, command logs, initial/final durable effects, fixed/still-failing/new findings, untested requirements and actual status. A clean scoped QA result establishes only its observed coverage. Launch readiness and delivery require their own accepted evidence.

Follow the stage contract. Return to the integrating controller for verification and delivery; QA does not create another shipping loop. Save unresolved work with exact replay instructions when a required prerequisite or budget is exhausted.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.