agentleFS
omdenkar2-uiomdenkar2-ui/all-in-one/skills/aio-spec/SKILL.md

aio-spec

Skill0 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub

Turn accepted backend behavior into versioned requirements, interfaces and acceptance criteria.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the exact request/design and current APIs, event schemas, persistence and consumers.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Write the contract and a requirement-to-verification matrix.

    line 16

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AIO Spec

Turn accepted backend behavior into versioned requirements, interfaces and acceptance criteria.

Protocol

  1. Read the exact request/design and current APIs, event schemas, persistence and consumers. Preserve settled scope; do not silently add features or change the public contract.
  2. Assign stable R IDs to observable requirements and V IDs to verifications. Define authentication context, input bounds, success/error behavior, status transitions, consistency, deadlines and compatibility.
  3. For jobs or agents, define effect/acknowledgement boundaries, stable operation identity, replay behavior, cancellation, budget exhaustion and terminal errors. Distinguish acceptance from completion.
  4. Name nonfunctional targets with units and workload assumptions, data retention and tenant invariants, and the operational owner. Unknown business facts remain explicitly unresolved.
  5. Write the contract and a requirement-to-verification matrix. Send a ready contract to aio-architecture or aio-plan; planning does not invent missing acceptance.

Return and handoff

A source-linked backend contract, R/V matrix, scope and unresolved questions. Standalone invocation ends with the spec.

In a pipeline, use the stage contract and return to the integrating controller. Run only this specialist's owned scope; preserve the user's accepted decisions and existing authorization.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.