aio-ship
Skill0 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Deliver a verified backend change locally, through a requested PR, or to an authorized deployment target. Use for shipping after implementation/review or refreshing a PR description; follows exact-head CI and reports pending or blocked states truthfully.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-workflowsSkill
- aio-agentsSkill
- aio-algorithmsSkill
- aio-apiSkill
- aio-architectureSkill
- aio-autoplanSkill
- aio-benchmarkSkill
- aio-brainstormSkill
- aio-canarySkill
- aio-checkpointSkill
- aio-ciSkill
- aio-commitSkill
- aio-compoundSkill
- aio-dataSkill
- aio-debugSkill
- aio-devex-reviewSkill
- aio-doc-reviewSkill
- aio-explainSkill
- aio-feedbackSkill
- aio-handoffSkill
- aio-ideateSkill
- aio-observeSkill
- aio-optimizeSkill
- aio-pipelinesSkill
- aio-plan-reviewSkill
- aio-planSkill
- aio-proofSkill
- aio-prototypeSkill
- aio-qa-onlySkill
- aio-qaSkill
- aio-releaseSkill
- aio-resumeSkill
- aio-reviewSkill
- aio-securitySkill
- aio-simplifySkill
- aio-specSkill
- aio-tddSkill
- aio-test-auditSkill
- aio-testSkill
- aio-verifySkill
- aio-workSkill
- aio-worktreeSkill
- all-in-oneSkill
- apple-appstore-reviewerSkill
- backend-algorithmsSkill
- backend-debugSkill
- backend-pipelinesSkill
- backend-planSkill
- backend-reviewSkill
- backend-verifySkill
- complete-destructionSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- play-policy-insightsSkill
- reverse-engineer-anythingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Local: verify artifact presence, content/hash and reproducibility when relevant.
- Very specific: line 14
Deployment/release: use AIO Release for an authorized target, built artifact, configuration/migration/rollback prerequisites and observed …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AIO Ship
Deliver to the destination the user actually requested. Read delivery procedure. Shipping does not itself authorize merge, public release, destructive migration, or unrelated external messages. Preserve standing authorization and avoid repeated approval gates.
Resolve delivery mode from the accepted request: local artifact, PR, or an explicitly authorized deployment. For implementation delivery, verify the exact source and required review/check evidence with AIO Verify in implementation scope. Delivery may honestly be pending at this preflight. Once the requested destination is observed, completion scope can check the final receipt; an outer controller retains that final gate when present. A description-only request uses the actual diff and available evidence without claiming checks that have not run. Prepare a concrete build, scoped diff and reviewer-ready description before any genuinely required final authorization.
- Local: verify artifact presence, content/hash and reproducibility when relevant. Record paths and limitations. No remote configured means truthful local delivery, never an invented PR or failed attempt to publish elsewhere.
- PR: use AIO Commit for canonical owned changes; inspect actual repository/head/base/remote and matching PR presence. Create only when requested/inherited shipping intent authorizes it. After successful creation, attach the PR with the host artifact tool. Use AIO CI for exact-head required checks and feedback follow-through within the requested watch budget.
- Deployment/release: use AIO Release for an authorized target, built artifact, configuration/migration/rollback prerequisites and observed health. Launch-store review applies only when mobile submission is in scope.
- Description-only: draft the title/body from the actual diff and evidence; edit the remote description only if requested. Do not commit/push because a PR URL was provided.
Return distinct observed states: local delivered, PR created with CI passed/pending/failed/attention, deployment healthy/failed/unknown, or blocked. A PR URL is not green CI; merge-ready is not merge authorization. When called by Complete Destruction, return delivery evidence and residuals to its single controller rather than rerunning implementation or closing its receipt independently.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

