agentleFS
omdenkar2-uiomdenkar2-ui/all-in-one/skills/aio-ci/SKILL.md

aio-ci

Skill0 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

Follow required backend PR or build checks to an observed terminal result without inventing CI success.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Follow required backend PR or build checks to an observed terminal result without inventing CI success.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Use bounded event waits/polls with backoff.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    After a new commit, resume against its head and rerun affected required checks.

    line 15

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

AIO Ci

Follow required backend PR or build checks to an observed terminal result without inventing CI success.

Protocol

  1. Identify the exact PR/build, current head SHA, repository-required check set and access. Use the installed provider tooling and inspect live status; verify changing APIs in official documentation.
  2. Distinguish queued/running, passed, failed, cancelled, skipped and missing required checks. An aggregate green badge or check for an older head is insufficient. An empty/error/auth-failed response is unknown, not a passed empty set. If the project has no applicable CI, return not applicable with actual policy evidence.
  3. Use bounded event waits/polls with backoff. Inspect failed job logs and separate product failures from infrastructure/access issues; repair code only when that action is authorized.
  4. After a new commit, resume against its head and rerun affected required checks. Do not launch duplicate workflows or cancel another owner's run casually.
  5. Return passed only when every required current-head check has an observed acceptable conclusion. A skip is acceptable only when the actual host/project policy and recorded reason permit it; otherwise it stays unresolved. Preserve the real skipped status in the evidence. Timeout, unavailable access or pending checks remain pending/attention with the next action.

Return and handoff

A current-head CI receipt with required checks, URLs/results, pending/failure reasons and next action.

In a pipeline, use the stage contract and return to the integrating controller. Run only this specialist's owned scope; preserve the user's accepted decisions and existing authorization.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.