aio-debug
Skill0 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub
Diagnose a backend bug, failed test, CI failure, agent/tool issue or pipeline incident by reproducing it, tracing boundaries and testing a causal hypothesis before a targeted fix. Use when behavior is unexplained or previous patches have not resolved it.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-workflowsSkill
- aio-agentsSkill
- aio-algorithmsSkill
- aio-apiSkill
- aio-architectureSkill
- aio-autoplanSkill
- aio-benchmarkSkill
- aio-brainstormSkill
- aio-canarySkill
- aio-checkpointSkill
- aio-ciSkill
- aio-commitSkill
- aio-compoundSkill
- aio-dataSkill
- aio-devex-reviewSkill
- aio-doc-reviewSkill
- aio-explainSkill
- aio-feedbackSkill
- aio-handoffSkill
- aio-ideateSkill
- aio-observeSkill
- aio-optimizeSkill
- aio-pipelinesSkill
- aio-plan-reviewSkill
- aio-planSkill
- aio-proofSkill
- aio-prototypeSkill
- aio-qa-onlySkill
- aio-qaSkill
- aio-releaseSkill
- aio-resumeSkill
- aio-reviewSkill
- aio-securitySkill
- aio-shipSkill
- aio-simplifySkill
- aio-specSkill
- aio-tddSkill
- aio-test-auditSkill
- aio-testSkill
- aio-verifySkill
- aio-workSkill
- aio-worktreeSkill
- all-in-oneSkill
- apple-appstore-reviewerSkill
- backend-algorithmsSkill
- backend-debugSkill
- backend-pipelinesSkill
- backend-planSkill
- backend-reviewSkill
- backend-verifySkill
- complete-destructionSkill
- launch-readinessSkill
- play-policy-insightsSkill
- reverse-engineer-anythingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
After confirming the hypothesis, establish a regression test/red failure with AIO TDD, apply the bounded fix, then run the reproduction and …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AIO Debug
Preserve any requested Careful / Freeze / Guard modifier from the owning run. Diagnosis can inspect dependencies, but a repair cannot silently widen resolved edit ownership. These modifiers are agent procedures rather than native blocking hooks.
Find the causal mechanism before patching a symptom. Read diagnostic procedure and maintain the hypothesis log for multi-step failures. Preserve current user work and any useful failing artifacts.
Capture the expected/actual behavior, triggering inputs, source/build/environment identity and complete error. Reproduce with the narrowest trustworthy test or request. If reproduction is nondeterministic, collect traces and isolate the condition before guessing. Do not log secrets, prompt contents with personal data, or production records wholesale.
Trace the first incorrect value/state across relevant API, agent, queue, storage and provider boundaries. Compare a working case and recent changes. State one falsifiable hypothesis supported by the evidence, then run the smallest discriminating experiment. Change one causal variable at a time.
After confirming the hypothesis, establish a regression test/red failure with AIO TDD, apply the bounded fix, then run the reproduction and affected contract/recovery tests. Use AIO Review for consequential fixes and AIO Verify before claiming resolution.
After three ineffective fixes, stop repeating the same approach: preserve attempts, revisit assumptions/state ownership/transaction ordering, obtain fresh review where available, and change the hypothesis or architecture within scope. Required behavior remains blocked until proved. Continue independent safe work and return the exact unresolved condition and next diagnostic action.
A diagnostic-only request ends with evidence and cause/uncertainty. A repair request or enclosing implementation controller carries the verified fix back to its checkpoint; this skill does not start a competing shipping pipeline or publish an incident response without authorization.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

