reply-desk
Skill2 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Concierge — goes through the LinkedIn inbox via Pastel, tags each conversation (hot, curious, timing, pushback, stop, skip), quotes what the person wrote, and drafts the answer. Use for "check my replies", "who's interested", or clearing the inbox.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- buying-committeeSkill
- call-readySkill
- campaign-launchSkill
- command-centerSkill
- competitor-watchSkill
- fit-checkSkill
- human-voiceSkill
- intent-radarSkill
- market-mapSkill
- message-writerSkill
- morning-briefSkill
- nudgeSkill
- outbound-briefSkill
- post-studioSkill
- priority-rankSkill
- reach-checkSkill
- social-warmupSkill
- what-worksSkill
- why-nowSkill
The file
Files
Reply desk — Concierge
House rules: ../command-center/shared/house-rules.md · Pastel tools: ../command-center/shared/pastel-tools.md
Steps
pastel_list_conversations(unread_only=true); include recent read ones if asked. Open each withpastel_get_conversation. The inbox comes from Pastel's copy of LinkedIn, which can lag slightly — say so if timing matters.- Tag every conversation:
| Tag | Sounds like | Goes to |
| hot | "Can we talk?", asks for a price, a demo, or next steps | call-ready, now |
| curious | Wants to understand something, no intent yet | answer here, then nudge if they go quiet |
| timing | "Not now", "after Q3", out of office with a return date | nudge, scheduled for the date they gave |
| pushback | Has a tool, no budget, not a priority | one thoughtful answer here, then leave it |
| stop | Asks not to be contacted, or is hostile | record it; no more messages |
| skip | Automatic notes, a bare "thanks", emoji | nothing |
- Draft answers for hot, curious, and pushback, hot first; run
human-voice; preparesend_chat_messageon the conversation'schat_idfor approval. - For every stop: prepare
mark_lead_status→NOT_INTERESTEDand a pause of any running sequence.
Output
# Replies — [date]
Open: n · hot n · curious n · timing n · pushback n · stop n
### [Person] · [tag]
They wrote: "…"
Answer:
> …
Next: [skill] · chat_id […]Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

