tdd
Skill808 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guided test-driven development workflow for .NET 10 using xUnit v3, WebApplicationFactory, Testcontainers, and Verify snapshots. Follows the strict red-green-refactor cycle. Use when: "TDD", "test-driven", "let's TDD this", "red green refactor", "write the test first", or when building a feature with clear acceptance criteria.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- trpc/trpctheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wowyuarm/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Contexera/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use capture-learning-tools, design-frontend-dev and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
The-Vibe-CompanySkillcapture-learning-tools
Turn technical conversations, bugs, CI failures, review comments,
Also in 5 projects that use this
The-Vibe-CompanySkilldesign-frontend-dev
Clean Impeccable frontend design skill. Use when the user wants to
Also in 5 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 14 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillfigure-it-out
Use when novel or multi-phase work needs an auditable workflow and no narrower playbook fits.
Also in 54 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-laziness-protocol
Apply when a refactor is adding wrappers or abstractions instead of simplifying.
Also in 45 projects that use this
- +2 more from The-Vibe-Company
- +5 more from jaydubya818
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- trpc/trpc★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- ccusage/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- ryoppippi/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- MODSetter/SurfSense★ 17ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository57 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/rules/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .opencode/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/dotnet-rules.mdCursor rule
- api-versioningSkill
- arch-checkSkill
- architecture-advisorSkill
- aspireSkill
- authenticationSkill
- avaloniaSkill
- build-fixSkill
- cachingSkill
- checkpointSkill
- ci-cdSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- configurationSkill
- console-cliSkill
- container-publishSkill
- convention-learnerSkill
- dddSkill
- dependency-injectionSkill
- desktop-mvvmSkill
- de-sloppifySkill
- dockerSkill
- dotnet-initSkill
- ef-coreSkill
- error-handlingSkill
- health-checkSkill
- httpclient-factorySkill
- instinct-systemSkill
- loggingSkill
- messagingSkill
- migrateSkill
- minimal-apiSkill
- modern-csharpSkill
- native-aotSkill
- openapiSkill
- opentelemetrySkill
- outdatedSkill
- planSkill
- project-setupSkill
- project-structureSkill
- resilienceSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- scalarSkill
- security-scanSkill
- serilogSkill
- specSkill
- testingSkill
- token-reportSkill
- verifySkill
- vertical-sliceSkill
- workflow-masterySkill
- wrap-upSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.
16
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Every cycle uses the .NET testing stack:
- Distinctive: line 45
Write a test that describes the desired behavior.
- Distinctive: line 69
Run the test and confirm it fails:
- Distinctive: line 74
If the test passes without implementation, the test is not testing what you think.
- Distinctive: line 79
Write the minimum code to make the test pass.
- Distinctive: line 82
Create the endpoint, handler, request/response types, and EF config as needed
- Distinctive: line 83
Use the simplest logic that satisfies the test assertion
- Distinctive: line 84
Do not refactor yet -- ugly passing code is fine at this stage
- Distinctive: line 86
Run the test and confirm it passes:
- Distinctive: line 96
Add validation, error handling, and edge cases (with new tests for each)
- Distinctive: line 97
Run the full test suite after each refactor step to catch regressions
- Distinctive: line 103
If any test goes red during refactoring, undo the last change and try a smaller step.
- Distinctive: line 123
If the project lacks test infrastructure, set it up before the first cycle:
- Distinctive: line 125
Create test project with xUnit v3 and required packages
- Distinctive: line 127
Add a shared fixture to avoid spinning up containers per test class
- Distinctive: line 128
Verify the infrastructure with a simple health-check test
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/tdd -- Red-Green-Refactor for .NET
What
Guides a strict test-driven development cycle for .NET features. Instead of writing implementation first and bolting on tests after, this command flips the order: write a failing test that defines the desired behavior, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor with confidence.
Every cycle uses the .NET testing stack:
- xUnit v3 -- Test framework with
[Fact]and[Theory] - WebApplicationFactory -- Integration tests against the real HTTP pipeline
- Testcontainers -- Real databases (PostgreSQL, SQL Server) in tests
- Verify -- Snapshot testing for complex response structures
- FakeTimeProvider -- Deterministic time in tests
When
- User says "TDD", "test-driven", "let's TDD this", "write the test first"
- Building a new feature with clear acceptance criteria
- Fixing a bug (write a test that reproduces the bug first, then fix)
- Adding behavior to an existing feature (test the new behavior first)
- Any time the user wants proof that code works before it ships
Skip TDD for: Trivial config changes, scaffolding without logic, documentation.
How
Cycle: Red -> Green -> Refactor
Each feature goes through one or more TDD cycles. A cycle covers one discrete behavior.
Step 1: Red -- Write the Failing Test
Write a test that describes the desired behavior. The test MUST fail because the implementation does not exist yet.
[Fact]
public async Task CreateOrder_WithValidItems_Returns201WithOrderId()
{
// Arrange
var client = _factory.CreateClient();
var request = new CreateOrderRequest([
new OrderItemRequest("SKU-001", 2, 29.99m)
]);
// Act
var response = await client.PostAsJsonAsync("/api/orders", request);
// Assert — plain xUnit Assert (FluentAssertions v8+ requires a commercial license)
Assert.Equal(HttpStatusCode.Created, response.StatusCode);
var result = await response.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<CreateOrderResponse>();
Assert.NotNull(result);
Assert.NotEqual(Guid.Empty, result.OrderId);
}Run the test and confirm it fails:
dotnet test --filter "CreateOrder_WithValidItems_Returns201WithOrderId"If the test passes without implementation, the test is not testing what you think. Rewrite it.
Step 2: Green -- Minimal Implementation
Write the minimum code to make the test pass. Do not add features, optimizations, or edge case handling. The goal is a green test, nothing more.
- Create the endpoint, handler, request/response types, and EF config as needed
- Use the simplest logic that satisfies the test assertion
- Do not refactor yet -- ugly passing code is fine at this stage
Run the test and confirm it passes:
dotnet test --filter "CreateOrder_WithValidItems_Returns201WithOrderId"Step 3: Refactor -- Clean Up with Confidence
Now that the test is green, refactor freely:
- Extract methods, rename variables, improve structure
- Apply modern C# patterns (primary constructors, records, collection expressions)
- Add validation, error handling, and edge cases (with new tests for each)
- Run the full test suite after each refactor step to catch regressions
dotnet testIf any test goes red during refactoring, undo the last change and try a smaller step.
Multi-Cycle Features
Most features require multiple TDD cycles. Plan the cycles upfront:
Feature: Order Management
Cycle 1: Create order with valid items -> 201
Cycle 2: Create order with empty items -> 400 validation error
Cycle 3: Create order with invalid SKU -> 400 with specific error
Cycle 4: Get order by ID -> 200 with full order details
Cycle 5: Get order that does not exist -> 404Each cycle adds one behavior. Never combine multiple behaviors in a single cycle.
Test Infrastructure Setup
If the project lacks test infrastructure, set it up before the first cycle:
- Create test project with xUnit v3 and required packages
- Configure
WebApplicationFactorywith Testcontainers for the real database - Add a shared fixture to avoid spinning up containers per test class
- Verify the infrastructure with a simple health-check test
Example
User: /tdd Let's TDD a product search endpoint
Claude: I'll plan the TDD cycles for product search:
Cycle 1: Search with matching term returns matching products
Cycle 2: Search with no matches returns empty list
Cycle 3: Search with pagination returns correct page
Cycle 4: Search with filters narrows results
Starting Cycle 1: Red phase
Writing a failing integration test for basic product search...
[writes test, runs it, confirms failure]
Cycle 1: Green phase
Implementing the minimum to make the search test pass...
[implements, runs test, confirms pass]
Cycle 1: Refactor phase
The implementation works but the query could use a projection
instead of loading full entities. Refactoring...
[refactors, runs full suite, all green]
Cycle 1 complete. Moving to Cycle 2...Related
/verify-- Run full verification after completing all TDD cycles/scaffold-- Generate initial feature structure that tests will drive
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

