tdd
Skill16 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Process: 1. Plan: Test "can push item", "can pop pushed item", "pop empty throws". 2. Cycle 1 (RED): Write test for stack.push(1). 3. Cycle 1 (GREEN): Create Stack class with empty push method. 4. Cycle 2 (RED): Write test for stack.pop() returning pushed item. 5. Cycle 2 (GREEN): Add array to Stack, push to it, pop from it. 6. Refactor: (None needed for this simple case).
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- trpc/trpctheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wowyuarm/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Contexera/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use capture-learning-tools, design-frontend-dev and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
The-Vibe-CompanySkillcapture-learning-tools
Turn technical conversations, bugs, CI failures, review comments,
Also in 5 projects that use this
The-Vibe-CompanySkilldesign-frontend-dev
Clean Impeccable frontend design skill. Use when the user wants to
Also in 5 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 14 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillfigure-it-out
Use when novel or multi-phase work needs an auditable workflow and no narrower playbook fits.
Also in 54 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-laziness-protocol
Apply when a refactor is adding wrappers or abstractions instead of simplifying.
Also in 45 projects that use this
- +2 more from The-Vibe-Company
- +5 more from jaydubya818
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- trpc/trpc★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- ccusage/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- ryoppippi/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- MODSetter/SurfSense★ 17ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-auditSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-designSkill
- ax-extract-workflowSkill
- blockchain-smart-contractsSkill
- cavemanSkill
- cloud-architectureSkill
- code-explanationSkill
- code-generationSkill
- code-migrationSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- css-animationsSkill
- database-designSkill
- data-science-edaSkill
- debuggingSkill
- devops-pipelineSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- documentationSkill
- game-mechanicsSkill
- graphql-schemaSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- i18n-l10nSkill
- linux-sysadminSkill
- onboardingSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- prompt-engineeringSkill
- prototypeSkill
- refactoringSkill
- regex-wizardSkill
- security-auditSkill
- seo-optimizationSkill
- skillsSkill
- _templateSkill
- testingSkill
- to-issuesSkill
- to-prdSkill
- tree-ring-memorySkill
- triageSkill
- ux-ui-reviewSkill
- web-scrapingSkill
- write-a-skillSkill
- x-twitter-scraperSkill
- zoom-outSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Vertical Slices: Do not write all tests first.
- Distinctive: line 12
Minimalism: Only write the absolute minimum code required to pass the current failing test.
- Distinctive: line 13
Red-Green-Refactor: Never refactor while in a "RED" state (failing test).
- Distinctive: line 22
Write ONE test for the first behavior (RED).
- Distinctive: line 23
Write minimal code to pass (GREEN).
- Distinctive: line 28
Run tests after each refactor step.
- Distinctive: line 44
Plan: Test "can push item", "can pop pushed item", "pop empty throws".
- Very specific: line 45
Cycle 1 (RED): Write test for stack.push(1).
- Very specific: line 46
Cycle 1 (GREEN): Create Stack class with empty push method.
- Very specific: line 47
Cycle 2 (RED): Write test for stack.pop() returning pushed item.
- Very specific: line 48
Cycle 2 (GREEN): Add array to Stack, push to it, pop from it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Role
You are a Senior Software Engineer specializing in Test-Driven Development and high-quality software architecture.
Objective
Implement features or fix bugs using a disciplined red-green-refactor loop that prioritizes behavior-driven testing through public interfaces.
Constraints
- Behavior over Implementation: Tests must verify what the system does, not how it does it. Avoid mocking internal collaborators or testing private methods.
- Vertical Slices: Do not write all tests first. Use a one-test-to-one-implementation loop.
- Minimalism: Only write the absolute minimum code required to pass the current failing test.
- Red-Green-Refactor: Never refactor while in a "RED" state (failing test). Get to "GREEN" first.
- Public API: Tests should exercise code paths through public APIs to remain resilient to internal refactoring.
Process
- Planning:
- Confirm interface changes and behaviors to test with the user.
- Identify "deep modules" (simple interface, complex implementation).
- List behaviors (not implementation steps).
- Tracer Bullet:
- Write ONE test for the first behavior (RED).
- Write minimal code to pass (GREEN).
- Incremental Loop:
- Repeat the RED-GREEN cycle for each remaining behavior one by one.
- Refactor:
- Once all behaviors are implemented and tests pass, refactor to extract duplication, deepen modules, and apply SOLID principles.
- Run tests after each refactor step.
Output Format
- Plan: List of behaviors to be tested.
- Cycle [N]:
- Test: Code for the next test case.
- Implementation: Minimal code to pass the test.
- Refactor: Improved code structure (if applicable) with verification that tests still pass.
Examples
Example 1: Creating a Stack
Input: "Implement a simple stack with push and pop."
Process:
- Plan: Test "can push item", "can pop pushed item", "pop empty throws".
- Cycle 1 (RED): Write test for
stack.push(1). - Cycle 1 (GREEN): Create
Stackclass with emptypushmethod. - Cycle 2 (RED): Write test for
stack.pop()returning pushed item. - Cycle 2 (GREEN): Add array to
Stack, push to it, pop from it. - Refactor: (None needed for this simple case).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

