agentleFS
codewithmukeshcodewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit/skills/dotnet-init/SKILL.md

dotnet-init

Skill808 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Interactive project initialization. Detects project type (web API, Blazor, worker, console, CLI tool, desktop, library), asks the right questions, and generates a customized CLAUDE.md — no manual template copying. Use when: "init project", "setup project", "initialize", "new project setup", "generate CLAUDE.md", "configure for dotnet-claude-kit", or starting Claude Code on a fresh or existing .NET codebase.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run-to-completion tool or long-running daemon?

    line 66

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/dotnet-init

What

Interactively initializes a .NET project for use with dotnet-claude-kit. Detects the project type, asks targeted questions about architecture and tech stack, then generates a fully customized CLAUDE.md in the project root.

No manual template copying required.

When

  • Starting a new .NET project with Claude Code
  • Adding dotnet-claude-kit to an existing project
  • "init project", "setup project", "generate CLAUDE.md", "configure for dotnet-claude-kit"

How

Step 1: Detect or Ask Project Type

Analyze the current directory to determine if this is an existing or greenfield project:

→ Look for .slnx / .sln files, then classify each .csproj:
  - Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web → web-api or blazor-app
  - Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Worker → worker-service
  - UseWPF / UseWindowsForms / UseMaui = true, or Avalonia package → desktop-app
  - Microsoft.NET.Sdk + OutputType Exe → console-cli
    (PackAsTool or System.CommandLine reference → CLI tool; else console utility)
  - Microsoft.NET.Sdk without OutputType Exe → class-library
  - Multiple projects with inter-module references → modular-monolith
  - If ambiguous, ask the user

→ If NO solution/project found (greenfield), ask "What are you building?":
    - REST API / microservice → web-api       - Blazor application → blazor-app
    - Background worker → worker-service       - Multi-module system → modular-monolith
    - Console app / CLI tool → console-cli     - NuGet package / library → class-library
    - Desktop app → desktop-app (then ask: Avalonia, WPF, WinForms, or MAUI?)
  - Ask "Project name?", then scaffold: dotnet new sln -n ProjectName --format slnx, then the matching
    template (webapi / worker / console / classlib / wpf / winforms / maui;
    Avalonia: dotnet new install Avalonia.Templates → avalonia.mvvm),
    Directory.Build.props with .NET 10 defaults, src/ and tests/ folders

Step 2: Questionnaire (by Project Type)

Web API / Blazor / Worker / Modular Monolith — load architecture-advisor:

  1. Domain complexity — CRUD-heavy, moderate business rules, or rich domain?
  2. Team size — Solo, small team, or large team?
  3. Module boundaries — Single deployable or multiple bounded contexts?
  4. Existing patterns — (existing projects only) Detect conventions via convention-learner skill

→ Recommend: VSA, Clean Architecture, DDD, or Modular Monolith with rationale.

Console / CLI tool — skip web architecture questions; load console-cli:

  • Run-to-completion tool or long-running daemon? (daemon → worker-service instead)
  • Distribution: dotnet tool (PackAsTool), Native AOT binary per OS (native-aot), or file-based script?
  • Needs DI/config/HTTP? → Generic Host inside the command action

Desktop — skip web architecture questions; load desktop-mvvm (+ avalonia for Avalonia):

  • Target OSes? (Windows-only → WPF is fine; macOS/Linux → Avalonia)
  • Native AOT / trimming wanted? (Avalonia only — WPF/WinForms don't support trimming)

Library — public API surface, target frameworks, AOT compatibility (IsAotCompatible).

Step 3: Tech Stack Selection

  • Database: PostgreSQL, SQL Server, SQLite, or none yet
  • Auth / Caching / Messaging (web + worker only): JWT/OIDC, HybridCache, Wolverine/MassTransit, or none yet
  • Testing: Confirm xUnit defaults (+ Testcontainers when a database is involved)

Step 4: Generate CLAUDE.md

Load the appropriate template from templates/ as a base, then customize:

  • Replace [ProjectName], set the chosen architecture (or app type), configure the tech stack
  • Existing projects: add conventions detected in Step 2; greenfield: recommended conventions
  • Templates: web-api, blazor-app, worker-service, modular-monolith, class-library, console-cli, desktop-app

Before writing, check for an existing CLAUDE.md. Never overwrite it silently.

→ If ./CLAUDE.md does NOT exist:
  - Write the generated content to ./CLAUDE.md

→ If ./CLAUDE.md ALREADY exists:
  - Read it and identify hand-written / custom sections
    (anything not produced by a kit template)
  - Ask: "You already have a CLAUDE.md. How should I proceed?"
    - Merge (recommended) → keep the user's custom sections, add or refresh the
      kit's architecture, tech-stack, and convention sections in place
    - Overwrite → replace it entirely with the freshly generated file
    - Keep → leave it untouched; print the generated content for manual copying
  - For Merge and Overwrite: back the original up to ./CLAUDE.md.bak first.
    Never discard user content without a .bak backup.

Step 5: Verify Setup

→ Confirm .mcp.json exists or create it (for Roslyn MCP server)
→ For existing projects:
  - Verify the solution file is discoverable
  - Run a quick health check to establish baseline
  - Report: "Project initialized. Run /health-check to see your baseline."
→ For greenfield projects:
  - Verify dotnet build succeeds on the scaffolded solution
  - Report: "Project created. Run /scaffold to add your first feature."
    (console/desktop: "Add your first command / view model.")

Skills invoked: project-setup, architecture-advisor, convention-learner; console/desktop: console-cli, desktop-mvvm, avalonia, native-aot Agent: dotnet-architect (web, worker, library) · app-engineer (console, CLI, desktop)

Example — Existing Project

User: /dotnet-init

Claude: Detected:
  - Solution: MyApp.slnx (3 projects)
  - SDK: Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web → Web API
  - Database: PostgreSQL (from connection string)
  - Auth: JWT (from appsettings)

  1. Domain complexity? [CRUD-heavy / Moderate / Rich domain]
  > Moderate

  2. Team size? [Solo / Small / Large]
  > Small

  Recommendation: Vertical Slice Architecture
  Generated: ./CLAUDE.md (MyApp + VSA + PostgreSQL + JWT)
  Run /health-check to see your baseline.

Example — Greenfield Project

User: /dotnet-init

Claude: No .sln or .csproj found. Let's set up a new project.

  1. What are you building? [REST API / Blazor / Worker / Console-CLI / Desktop / Library / Modular Monolith]
  > REST API

  2. Project name?
  > OrderService

  3. Domain complexity? [CRUD-heavy / Moderate / Rich domain]
  > CRUD-heavy

  Recommendation: Vertical Slice Architecture

  Creating solution...
  → dotnet new sln -n OrderService --format slnx
  → dotnet new webapi -n OrderService.Api -o src/OrderService.Api
  → dotnet new xunit3 -n OrderService.Tests -o tests/OrderService.Tests
  → Directory.Build.props with .NET 10 defaults
  → Generated: ./CLAUDE.md (OrderService + VSA + scaffold-ready)

  Run /scaffold to add your first feature.

Example — Existing Project With a CLAUDE.md

User: /dotnet-init

Claude: Detected:
  - Solution: MyApp.slnx (3 projects) → Web API
  - Found an existing CLAUDE.md (custom "Deployment" and "Team conventions" sections)

  You already have a CLAUDE.md. How should I proceed?
  [Merge (recommended) / Overwrite / Keep]
  > Merge

  → Backed up original to ./CLAUDE.md.bak
  → Kept your Deployment + Team conventions sections
  → Refreshed architecture (VSA), tech-stack (PostgreSQL + JWT), and convention sections
  Generated: ./CLAUDE.md
  Run /health-check to see your baseline.

Related

  • /plan — Plan before building features
  • /health-check — Assess project health after init
  • /scaffold — Scaffold features using the chosen architecture

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.