agentleFS
codewithmukeshcodewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit/skills/outdated/SKILL.md

outdated

Skill808 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Dependency health report for .NET solutions: outdated NuGet packages, vulnerable versions, and commercial-license traps (MediatR, MassTransit, FluentAssertions, AutoMapper) — powered by the get_nuget_packages MCP tool. Invoke when: "outdated packages", "check dependencies", "stale packages", "package audit", "dependency health", "are my packages up to date", "license check", "vulnerable packages", "nuget audit".

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before a .NET version upgrade (pairs with /migrate Flow B)

    line 33
  2. Distinctive:

    After inheriting an unfamiliar codebase

    line 34
  3. Very specific:

    Check the inventory against the known commercial moves (full rationale in knowledge/package-recommendations.md):

    line 63

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/outdated

What

A three-layer dependency health report:

  1. Inventory — every PackageReference per project, with TFMs and central package management awareness, via the get_nuget_packages MCP tool (no network, token-cheap).
  2. Staleness + vulnerabilities — current vs latest stable, and known CVEs, via the dotnet CLI.
  3. License screen — flags packages that moved to commercial licenses so an innocent dotnet outdated --upgrade doesn't silently change your legal position.

The output is a single prioritized table — vulnerabilities first, license traps second, staleness last — with a recommended action per row.

When

  • "check for outdated packages", "package audit", "dependency health"
  • Before a .NET version upgrade (pairs with /migrate Flow B)
  • After inheriting an unfamiliar codebase
  • Dependabot/NuGet audit warnings appeared and you want the full picture
  • Periodically on long-lived projects — quarterly is a good cadence

How

Step 1: Inventory (MCP, no network)

get_nuget_packages()                          -- whole solution
get_nuget_packages(projectFilter: "Api")      -- or one project

Returns per-project {Name, TargetFramework, Cpm, Packages: [{Id, Version}]}. Note Cpm: true — updates then belong in Directory.Packages.props, not the csproj. Flag mixed TFMs across projects while you're here.

Step 2: Staleness and vulnerabilities (CLI)

dotnet list package --outdated
dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive

Both need a successful restore first. If restore fails, fix that before auditing — a broken lock state makes version output unreliable.

Step 3: License screen

Check the inventory against the known commercial moves (full rationale in knowledge/package-recommendations.md):

PackageCommercial fromFree alternative
MediatR13+ (Lucky Penny, RPL)Mediator (martinothamar) — source-generated, MIT
MassTransit9+ (v8 Apache, patches end 2026 then EOL)Wolverine 6.x, or stay on v8 short-term
FluentAssertions8+ (v7 stays Apache, frozen)xUnit built-in Assert (kit default), Shouldly, AwesomeAssertions
AutoMapper15+ (Lucky Penny)Manual mapping (kit default) or Mapperly (MIT)

A license flag fires when the project is on the free major and a naive "update all" would cross the boundary — that is the trap this step exists for.

Step 4: Report

One table, priority-ordered:

PriorityMeaningAction
VULNERABLEKnown CVE in current versionUpdate now, test, deploy
LICENSENext major crosses a commercial boundaryPin below boundary or plan migration
MAJORBehind a major (breaking changes likely)One at a time, release notes first
MINOR/PATCHRoutine driftBatch patches; minors one at a time

Step 5: Act (optional)

Offer to execute updates via /migrate Flow C — one package at a time, dotnet build && dotnet test between each. Never batch major updates: batched failures are unattributable.

MCP Tools Used

  • get_nuget_packages — inventory, CPM detection, TFM audit
  • get_diagnostics — verify the solution still compiles clean after updates

Example

User: /outdated

Claude: Inventorying packages (get_nuget_packages)...
  3 projects, CPM enabled (Directory.Packages.props), all net10.0.

  Checking versions and CVEs...

  | Package                  | Current | Latest  | Priority   | Action                          |
  |--------------------------|---------|---------|------------|---------------------------------|
  | System.Text.Json (trans.)| 10.0.2  | 10.0.10 | VULNERABLE | Update now (CVE-2026-XXXX)      |
  | MassTransit              | 8.3.0   | 9.1.2   | LICENSE    | v9 is commercial. Stay on v8    |
  |                          |         |         |            | (EOL end 2026) or plan Wolverine|
  | Serilog.AspNetCore       | 9.0.0   | 10.0.0  | MAJOR      | Update alone, check sink compat |
  | FluentValidation         | 12.0.1  | 12.1.1  | PATCH      | Batch with other patches        |

  1 vulnerability, 1 license trap, 1 major, 1 patch.
  Want me to apply these via /migrate Flow C?

Related

  • /migrate — Flow C executes the updates this report recommends
  • knowledge/package-recommendations.md — vetted packages + licensing detail
  • knowledge/mediatr-to-mediator-migration.md — step-by-step MediatR exit
  • /verify — full pipeline after applying updates

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.