agentleFS
codewithmukeshcodewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit/skills/docker/SKILL.md

docker

Skill808 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Docker containerization for .NET 10 applications. Covers multi-stage builds, .NET container images, non-root user configuration, health checks, and .dockerignore. Load this skill when containerizing an application with a Dockerfile, optimizing image size, setting up Docker Compose for local development, or when the user mentions "Docker", "Dockerfile", "container", "docker-compose", "image", "multi-stage", "non-root", ".dockerignore", or "container health check". For Dockerfile-less SDK publishing (`dotnet publish /t:PublishContainer`), load the container-publish skill instead.

55 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ml-training-recipe, replication and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • getcompanion-aiSkill

    ml-training-recipe

    Find implementable ML training recipes from papers, datasets, docs, and code. Use when the user wants to fine-tune, train, reproduce, or choose a practical ML method, dataset, hyperparameter setup, or benchmark recipe.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • getcompanion-aiSkill

    replication

    Plan a replication of a paper, claim, or benchmark, and execute only after an explicit environment choice. Use when the user asks to replicate results, reproduce an experiment, verify a claim empirically, or build a replication package.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • brainbytes-devSkill

    alpha-research

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • JaimeParkerSkill

    paper-code-audit

    Perform three-way cross-validation of a research paper by comparing the original paper text (via Zotero), official code implementation (via Git), and personal Obsidian notes. Use this skill whenever the user wants to "audit a paper", "verify paper claims against code", "cross-check notes with implementation", "triangulate paper + code + notes", "find discrepancies between paper and code", or mentions wanting a deep, structured comparison of a paper's claims against its implementation and their own notes. Also trigger when the user asks to "analyze this paper thoroughly" with code available, or when they want to systematically reconcile what the paper says, what the code does, and what their notes claim.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • Sorcha-PlatformSkill

    redis

    Implements Redis caching, session management, and distributed coordination for the Sorcha platform. Use when: Adding caching layers, token revocation, rate limiting, SignalR backplane, or distributed state.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • mjunaidcaSkill

    kubernetes

    Production-grade Kubernetes manifests and debugging for containerized applications. This skill should be used when users ask to deploy to Kubernetes, create K8s manifests, containerize for K8s, set up Deployments/Services/Jobs/StatefulSets/CronJobs, create namespaces with resource quotas, set up multi-team isolation, configure ResourceQuota/ LimitRange, secure with RBAC (ServiceAccount, Role, RoleBinding), configure init containers (model download, db wait, migrations), set up sidecars (logging, metrics), or debug pods (CrashLoopBackOff, logs, exec, describe, events). Auto-detects from Dockerfile/code, generates hardened manifests with educational comments. CKAD-aligned.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • +1 more from getcompanion-ai

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 47 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Prefer orchestrator-level probes (Kubernetes livenessProbe, Compose healthcheck) over a Dockerfile HEALTHCHECK — the standard aspnet and …

    line 63
  2. Very specific:

    If you must have an in-image HEALTHCHECK, base the runtime stage on a non-chiseled image that includes wget — never re-run the app binary …

    line 82

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 47 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Docker

Core Principles

  1. Multi-stage builds always — Separate build and runtime stages. Build in the SDK image, run in the ASP.NET runtime image.
  2. Non-root by default — .NET container images support USER app by default since .NET 8. Never run as root in production.
  3. Layer caching matters — Copy .csproj files and restore before copying source code. This caches NuGet dependencies across builds.
  4. Health probes at the orchestrator level — Expose a /health/live endpoint and let Kubernetes/Compose probe it. Chiseled and default aspnet images have no shell or curl, so in-image HEALTHCHECK commands have nothing to run with.

Patterns

Multi-Stage Dockerfile for Web API

# Stage 1: Build
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:10.0 AS build
WORKDIR /src

# Copy project files and restore (cached layer)
COPY ["src/MyApp.Api/MyApp.Api.csproj", "src/MyApp.Api/"]
COPY ["src/MyApp.Domain/MyApp.Domain.csproj", "src/MyApp.Domain/"]
COPY ["Directory.Build.props", "."]
COPY ["Directory.Packages.props", "."]
RUN dotnet restore "src/MyApp.Api/MyApp.Api.csproj"

# Copy everything and build
COPY . .
RUN dotnet publish "src/MyApp.Api/MyApp.Api.csproj" \
    -c Release \
    -o /app/publish \
    --no-restore

# Stage 2: Runtime
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0 AS runtime
WORKDIR /app

# Non-root user (default in .NET 8+ images)
USER app

COPY --from=build /app/publish .

EXPOSE 8080

ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "MyApp.Api.dll"]

Container Health Probes

Prefer orchestrator-level probes (Kubernetes livenessProbe, Compose healthcheck) over a Dockerfile HEALTHCHECK — the standard aspnet and chiseled images ship no shell, no curl, and no wget, so there is nothing inside the container to run the probe with. Point the orchestrator at /health/live:

# docker-compose — probe from outside the app process
services:
  api:
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD-SHELL", "wget -qO- http://localhost:8080/health/live || exit 1"]
      interval: 30s
      timeout: 3s
      retries: 3
# Note: CMD-SHELL requires a shell + wget in the image. Use a non-chiseled
# variant for this, or better: let Kubernetes httpGet probes do it —
# they run from the kubelet, needing nothing inside the image.

If you must have an in-image HEALTHCHECK, base the runtime stage on a non-chiseled image that includes wget — never re-run the app binary as the probe command; that starts a second instance instead of checking the first.

.dockerignore

**/.git
**/.vs
**/bin
**/obj
**/node_modules
**/Dockerfile*
**/docker-compose*
**/tests

Docker Compose for Local Development

Key .NET-specific concerns — pass connection strings via environment, use depends_on with health checks:

services:
  api:
    build:
      context: .
      dockerfile: src/MyApp.Api/Dockerfile
    ports:
      - "5000:8080"
    environment:
      - ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Development
      - ConnectionStrings__Default=Host=postgres;Database=myapp;Username=postgres;Password=postgres
      - ConnectionStrings__Redis=redis:6379
    depends_on:
      postgres:
        condition: service_healthy
  # Add postgres/redis services with healthcheck — standard boilerplate

Optimized Build with .slnx

For solutions with multiple projects, restore only the necessary projects.

FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:10.0 AS build
WORKDIR /src

# Copy solution and all project files
COPY *.slnx .
COPY Directory.Build.props .
COPY Directory.Packages.props .
COPY src/**/*.csproj ./src/

# Restore project structure
RUN for file in src/**/*.csproj; do \
    mkdir -p $(dirname $file) && mv $file $(dirname $file)/; \
    done
RUN dotnet restore

COPY . .
RUN dotnet publish src/MyApp.Api -c Release -o /app/publish --no-restore

Health Check Endpoint

// In Program.cs — lightweight health endpoint for Docker
app.MapGet("/health/live", () => Results.Ok("healthy"))
    .ExcludeFromDescription();

Anti-patterns

Don't Use SDK Image for Runtime

# BAD — SDK image is 900MB+, includes compilers
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:10.0
COPY . .
RUN dotnet run

# GOOD — separate build and runtime, runtime image is ~200MB
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0

Don't Copy Everything Before Restore

# BAD — any source change invalidates the NuGet cache
COPY . .
RUN dotnet restore

# GOOD — copy only project files first, then restore
COPY ["src/MyApp.Api/MyApp.Api.csproj", "src/MyApp.Api/"]
RUN dotnet restore "src/MyApp.Api/MyApp.Api.csproj"
COPY . .

Don't Run as Root

# BAD — running as root (security risk)
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0
COPY --from=build /app .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "MyApp.Api.dll"]

# GOOD — use the built-in non-root user
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0
USER app
COPY --from=build /app .
ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "MyApp.Api.dll"]

Decision Guide

ScenarioRecommendation
Web API containerMulti-stage build with aspnet runtime image
Worker serviceMulti-stage build with dotnet/runtime image
Local developmentDocker Compose with service dependencies
CI buildsMulti-stage build (self-contained)
Image size optimizationUse Alpine variant + trimming for small images
Health monitoring/health endpoint + orchestrator probe (K8s httpGet / Compose healthcheck)
SecretsEnvironment variables or mounted secrets, never in image

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.