agentleFS
codewithmukeshcodewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit/skills/build-fix/SKILL.md

build-fix

Skill808 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Autonomous iteration loops for .NET: drive a broken build or failing test suite to green with bounded iterations, progress detection, and fail-safe guards that prevent infinite retries and wasted tokens. The build-fix loop (dotnet build, parse, categorize, fix, rebuild) is the primary flow; the test-fix loop is a first-class variant. Invoke when the build is broken, after a major refactor or dependency update, or when the user says "fix the build", "build is broken", "make it compile", "make the tests pass", "fix failing tests", "keep going until it works", "autonomous", "loop", "auto-fix", or "keep fixing".

13 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use docs-ci, docs-interfaces and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • jh941213Skill

    docs-ci

    문서 CI(링크·OpenAPI lint·breaking 게이트·mermaid 검증)나 문서 드리프트 감지(docs.yaml 신선도 검사)를 설치하거나 돌릴 때 사용. 문서 내용 작성은 docs-architecture·docs-interfaces·docs-manuals.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • jh941213Skill

    docs-interfaces

    API·이벤트 인터페이스 문서(OpenAPI·swagger·AsyncAPI 명세, 엔드포인트 레퍼런스, API 구성도·시퀀스, API CHANGELOG)를 만들거나 코드와 맞출 때 사용. 시스템 구성도는 docs-architecture, API 설계 원칙은 api-design-principles.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-import

    Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • RachaelQuiselSkill

    client-docs

    Client documentation. Use when a build needs documentation updates or missing project documents need to be identified.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • planailabsSkill

    docs-architecture

    Layout, build pipeline, and structural gotchas for this dual-Astro repo. Read before changing structure, routing, or adding content. Operational/dev-server questions → dev-build skill.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +4 more from jh941213
  • +1 more from TheKREATORS

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After a major refactor that touched type names, namespaces, or signatures

    line 32
  2. Distinctive:

    After updating NuGet packages (especially major version bumps)

    line 33
  3. Distinctive:

    After merging a branch with conflicts resolved but not compiled

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    After scaffolding or code generation that needs manual adjustments

    line 35
  5. Distinctive:

    Never modify files silently.

    line 54
  6. Distinctive:

    If iteration 3 fails, the code stays in iteration 2's state.

    line 56
  7. Distinctive:

    Read the test — understand the assertion and setup

    line 86
  8. Distinctive:

    Read the production code — understand the actual behavior

    line 87

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/build-fix

What

The kit's autonomous iteration-loop skill. It drives a broken dotnet build (or failing dotnet test) to green by looping: run, parse failures, categorize by root cause, apply targeted fixes, re-run. It repeats until green or a guard fires — the same way an experienced developer works through a wall of red, but with hard limits that stop it from thrashing.

This is not a single-pass fix. It handles cascading errors where fixing one issue reveals the next.

When

  • The build is broken and there are multiple compiler errors
  • Tests are failing after code changes or a build-fix pass
  • After a major refactor that touched type names, namespaces, or signatures
  • After updating NuGet packages (especially major version bumps)
  • After merging a branch with conflicts resolved but not compiled
  • After scaffolding or code generation that needs manual adjustments
  • User says: "fix the build", "make it compile", "make the tests pass", "keep going until it works", "keep fixing"

How

Loop Discipline (applies to every loop)

  1. Bounded iteration, always — Default max 5 iterations, hard cap 10 (user "keep going" extends by 3, never past 10). If 5 iterations cannot solve it, the problem needs human judgment, not a 6th identical attempt.
  2. Progress or exit — Each iteration must reduce the error/failure count. Same errors after a fix attempt = STUCK: stop, report, and re-plan with a different approach. Never retry the same fix that already failed.
  3. Categorize before fixing — Group errors by root cause and fix the highest-leverage first (one missing using can erase a dozen downstream errors).
  4. Transparency per iteration — Report what changed and why: Iteration 3/5: fixed CS0246 by adding using System.Text.Json, 2 remain. Never modify files silently.
  5. Atomicity — Each iteration leaves the codebase no worse than before. If iteration 3 fails, the code stays in iteration 2's state.

Primary Flow: Build-Fix Loop (max 5 iterations)

  1. Build — Run dotnet build, capture full error output
  2. Parse — Extract every error CS#### with file, line, and message
  3. Categorize — Group by root cause:

    CategoryCodesFix strategy
    Missing using/referenceCS0246, CS0234Add using, package, or project ref
    Type mismatchCS0029, CS1503Check expected type, cast or convert
    API changeCS0117, CS7036Check new signature, update call sites
    NullabilityCS8600–CS8604Add null check, ?. or ??
    Ambiguity / duplicateCS0104, CS0121, CS0111Qualify namespace, remove dupe
    Missing memberCS1061Check spelling, verify member exists
    Missing implementationCS0535Implement interface/abstract members
    Obsolete APICS0618Replace with recommended alternative
  4. Fix — Apply targeted fixes, root-cause/highest-leverage errors first
  5. Rebuild — Run dotnet build again, compare error count
  6. Evaluate — Zero errors: run dotnet test as a sanity check, report success. Fewer errors: continue. Same errors: STUCK — exit and re-plan. More errors: revert the iteration, report REGRESSION.

Variant: Test-Fix Loop (max 5; 3 if it follows a build-fix pass)

Same loop, same guards, with dotnet test --no-build as the runner and one critical extra step — diagnose before fixing:

  1. Read the test — understand the assertion and setup
  2. Read the production code — understand the actual behavior
  3. Decide where the bug lives: wrong expectation → fix the test; production bug → fix the code; incomplete setup → fix the setup; contract changed → update the test to match
  4. Never weaken an assertion to make a test pass. BAD: Assert.Equal(expected, actual) → Assert.NotNull(actual). GOOD: fix the production code so the original assertion passes.

Fail-Safe Guards (immediate exit)

  • STUCK — same errors/failures after a fix, or count oscillates (3 → 2 → 3): report what could not be fixed and what a human should check
  • REGRESSION — an iteration introduced more errors than it fixed: revert its changes, report
  • Cascading failures — fixing one error spawns 3+ new ones twice in a row: the approach is wrong, stop
  • Critical error — wrong SDK, missing project file, corrupted solution, or the test runner itself fails: human intervention needed, stop
  • User interruption — finish the current iteration, report progress, ask how to proceed

Other Loops

The same discipline — bounded iterations, progress detection, fail-safe guards — governs refactor passes (/de-sloppify: verify build + tests after each target, revert on failure) and scaffolding (/scaffold: generate, then run nested build-fix and test-fix loops). Nested loops get a smaller budget (parent 5 → nested 3), max nesting depth 2, total budget 15.

Invokes

TypeNamePurpose
Skillinstinct-systemCapture fix patterns in MEMORY.md
Agentdotnet-architectConsulted for architectural error patterns

MCP Tools Used

  • get_diagnostics — Compiler errors/warnings scoped to file or project
  • find_symbol — Locate moved or renamed types
  • find_references — Assess blast radius of a broken API change
  • get_project_graph — Dependency order for fixing reference errors

Example

User: /build-fix

Claude: Running dotnet build...
  Found 12 errors across 4 files.

  Iteration 1/5:
  - 6 errors: Missing namespace (CS0246) — adding using directives
  - 3 errors: Type mismatch (CS1503) — updating method signatures
  - 3 errors: Interface not implemented (CS0738) — package API changed

  Rebuilding... 3 errors remaining.

  Iteration 2/5:
  - 3 errors: CS0738 after xunit.v3 upgrade
    - IAsyncLifetime.InitializeAsync now returns ValueTask (was Task in v2),
      and DisposeAsync comes from IAsyncDisposable
    - Updating 3 test fixtures to the ValueTask signatures

  Rebuilding... 0 errors. Build is green.

  Running dotnet test... All 47 tests passed.
  Added to Memory > Packages: "xunit.v3 IAsyncLifetime uses ValueTask signatures"

Related

  • /verify — Full verification pass (build + test + format + diagnostics)
  • /tdd — Red-green-refactor when building new features test-first
  • /de-sloppify — Clean up code quality issues after the build is green

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.