agentleFS
aradmanamnaoonaradmanamnaoon/vibe-coding-skills/skills/testing/ui-flow-verifier/SKILL.md

ui-flow-verifier

Skill0 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Verify real user flows in a browser across navigation, forms, async states, and errors. Use when a visible frontend feature is added or claimed complete.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read applicable repository instructions before edits.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Start the application in the closest supported test configuration and confirm the correct URL/build is under test.

    line 32
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify navigation, enabled/disabled states, validation, loading, success, empty, and at least one failure path as relevant.

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Use local/sandbox accounts and data.

    line 46
  5. Distinctive:

    No unexpected console/runtime error occurs in the verified flow.

    line 51
  6. Distinctive:

    If no browser harness is available, run lower-level checks and explicitly mark browser verification not executed.

    line 63

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

Prove that a user-visible flow works end to end rather than only rendering components.

When to activate

Frontend changes affect navigation, input, network requests, persistence, or visible outcomes.

When not to activate

Pure styling/token changes with no interaction and existing visual checks are sufficient.

Preconditions

  • Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
  • Preserve unrelated working-tree changes and establish a baseline when the workflow can modify code.
  • Identify which tools and environments are actually available; do not claim unavailable checks ran.

Required inputs

  • Acceptance flow
  • Runnable app and test data
  • Browser automation capability

Workflow

  1. Start the application in the closest supported test configuration and confirm the correct URL/build is under test.
  2. Execute the critical flow using semantic roles/labels or stable test IDs, not fragile pixel coordinates.
  3. Verify navigation, enabled/disabled states, validation, loading, success, empty, and at least one failure path as relevant.
  4. Assert the real visible/URL/data outcome after each meaningful action rather than only click success.
  5. Inspect console/network errors that occur during the flow.
  6. Repeat at one representative narrow viewport if the flow is user-facing and responsive.
  7. Capture deterministic test evidence; screenshots may supplement but not replace assertions.

Relevant tools

Playwright or equivalent CLI/MCP/browser harness, app logs, network inspection.

Safety restrictions

Use local/sandbox accounts and data. Do not publish or submit real external actions unless authorized.

Validation

  • The critical user flow reaches the specified final outcome through real handlers.
  • No unexpected console/runtime error occurs in the verified flow.
  • Failure/validation behavior is observed, not inferred.

Expected output

  • Executed flow steps
  • Assertions and browser evidence
  • Console/network findings
  • Unverified flows

Failure handling

If no browser harness is available, run lower-level checks and explicitly mark browser verification not executed.

Completion criteria

The skill is complete only when every applicable validation item above has observed evidence or is explicitly marked not executed with the concrete blocker. Do not replace missing evidence with confidence language.

Research mapping

This skill was selected from research problems: P024, P039. See research/vibe-coding-problems.md and research/problem-evidence.csv in the Vibe Coding Skills repository.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.