authentication-security-auditor
Skill0 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit authentication flows for server-side identity verification, session/token handling, and bypass paths. Use when login, session, OAuth, API-key, or protected-route code changes.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- completion-claims-auditorSkill
- existing-work-preservationSkill
- mcp-reliability-auditorSkill
- multi-agent-integration-reviewerSkill
- project-context-recoverySkill
- requirement-traceability-auditorSkill
- scope-drift-guardSkill
- architecture-complexity-auditorSkill
- dependency-cycle-auditorSkill
- database-schema-reviewerSkill
- data-consistency-auditorSkill
- migration-safety-reviewerSkill
- loop-breakerSkill
- reproduction-builderSkill
- root-cause-debuggerSkill
- dependency-grounding-auditorSkill
- ci-failure-investigatorSkill
- cross-platform-readiness-auditorSkill
- environment-config-auditorSkill
- environment-parity-auditorSkill
- production-readiness-auditorSkill
- documentation-accuracy-auditorSkill
- token-efficient-workflowSkill
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- dead-feature-detectorSkill
- responsive-design-auditorSkill
- ux-state-completeness-auditorSkill
- release-verification-agentSkill
- agent-tool-trust-auditorSkill
- authorization-boundary-auditorSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditorSkill
- injection-risk-auditorSkill
- input-validation-auditorSkill
- secret-leakage-detectorSkill
- security-misconfiguration-auditorSkill
- api-contract-auditorSkill
- integration-reality-checkerSkill
- missing-test-detectorSkill
- regression-detectorSkill
- test-quality-auditorSkill
- ui-flow-verifierSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Verify that protected operations establish trustworthy identity on the server side.
- Distinctive: line 20
Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Distinctive: line 35
Verify client-side state is never the sole gate for a protected server action.
- Distinctive: line 36
Check session fixation, logout/invalidation, cookie flags, CSRF where relevant, and safe failure defaults.
- Distinctive: line 37
Test unauthenticated, malformed/expired credential, valid credential, and provider-failure cases.
- Distinctive: line 47
Use synthetic credentials in tests.
- Distinctive: line 64
If provider configuration is inaccessible, validate code-level enforcement and mark provider-side controls unverified.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
Verify that protected operations establish trustworthy identity on the server side.
When to activate
Authentication code, protected routes, session middleware, tokens, or identity providers are added or changed.
When not to activate
A static/public endpoint has no identity requirement and authentication is outside the change surface.
Preconditions
- Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Preserve unrelated working-tree changes and establish a baseline when the workflow can modify code.
- Identify which tools and environments are actually available; do not claim unavailable checks ran.
Required inputs
- Auth architecture and provider
- Protected entry points
- Session/token configuration
- Relevant tests
Workflow
- Map every protected entry point to the component that establishes authenticated identity.
- Trace credentials/tokens from receipt through validation: signature or session lookup, issuer/audience/expiry, revocation/session state where applicable.
- Verify client-side state is never the sole gate for a protected server action.
- Check session fixation, logout/invalidation, cookie flags, CSRF where relevant, and safe failure defaults.
- Test unauthenticated, malformed/expired credential, valid credential, and provider-failure cases.
- Confirm sensitive error responses do not disclose credential/token internals.
- Record provider-specific assumptions and links to configuration evidence.
Relevant tools
Route search, auth middleware, integration tests, provider docs/config when accessible.
Safety restrictions
Use synthetic credentials in tests; never paste or replay production sessions/tokens.
Validation
- Unauthenticated and invalid identities cannot reach protected effects.
- Valid identities still work through the intended flow.
- Failure paths deny access by default.
Expected output
- Authentication boundary map
- Bypass findings
- Test evidence
- Provider/config assumptions
Failure handling
If provider configuration is inaccessible, validate code-level enforcement and mark provider-side controls unverified.
Completion criteria
The skill is complete only when every applicable validation item above has observed evidence or is explicitly marked not executed with the concrete blocker. Do not replace missing evidence with confidence language.
Research mapping
This skill was selected from research problems: P014. See research/vibe-coding-problems.md and research/problem-evidence.csv in the Vibe Coding Skills repository.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

