agentleFS
aradmanamnaoonaradmanamnaoon/vibe-coding-skills/skills/deployment/production-readiness-auditor/SKILL.md

production-readiness-auditor

Skill0 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub

Audit a service or application for deployability, health/readiness, logging, failure behavior, backup/recovery assumptions, and critical smoke checks. Use before a release or production handoff.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read applicable repository instructions before edits.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Verify reproducible build and production-mode startup from declared dependencies/configuration.

    line 33
  3. Distinctive:

    Check liveness/readiness semantics distinguish process alive from dependencies ready when appropriate.

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Check structured logs/error reporting avoid secrets and contain enough correlation/context to diagnose critical flows.

    line 36
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not deploy or mutate production merely because a readiness audit was requested unless deployment is explicitly authorized.

    line 47
  6. Distinctive:

    If production/platform access is unavailable, finish repository/local readiness and clearly separate unexecuted production controls.

    line 64

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

Require operational evidence in addition to a successful build.

When to activate

A service/application is approaching production deployment or a readiness review is requested.

When not to activate

A library/package has no running service or production operation surface.

Preconditions

  • Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
  • Preserve unrelated working-tree changes and establish a baseline when the workflow can modify code.
  • Identify which tools and environments are actually available; do not claim unavailable checks ran.

Required inputs

  • Deployment architecture
  • Build/start process
  • Critical user/API flows
  • Observability/health configuration

Workflow

  1. Verify reproducible build and production-mode startup from declared dependencies/configuration.
  2. Check liveness/readiness semantics distinguish process alive from dependencies ready when appropriate.
  3. Identify critical dependency failures and ensure startup/runtime behavior is observable rather than silently degraded.
  4. Check structured logs/error reporting avoid secrets and contain enough correlation/context to diagnose critical flows.
  5. Review persistence backup/restore, migration, queue/retry, and data-loss assumptions relevant to this service.
  6. Define and run the smallest post-deploy smoke set that proves critical paths without destructive external effects.
  7. Record monitoring/alerts/SLIs that require platform access as external checks, not inferred evidence.

Relevant tools

Build/runtime, container, smoke probes, logs, deployment config, platform tools when authorized.

Safety restrictions

Do not deploy or mutate production merely because a readiness audit was requested unless deployment is explicitly authorized.

Validation

  • Production-mode artifact starts in a clean environment where feasible.
  • Health/readiness and critical smoke checks have observed results.
  • Operational dependencies and unverified external controls are explicit.

Expected output

  • Readiness checklist with evidence
  • Smoke results
  • Operational risks
  • Platform checks pending

Failure handling

If production/platform access is unavailable, finish repository/local readiness and clearly separate unexecuted production controls.

Completion criteria

The skill is complete only when every applicable validation item above has observed evidence or is explicitly marked not executed with the concrete blocker. Do not replace missing evidence with confidence language.

Research mapping

This skill was selected from research problems: P027, P043. See research/vibe-coding-problems.md and research/problem-evidence.csv in the Vibe Coding Skills repository.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.