multi-agent-integration-reviewer
Skill0 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Integrate parallel agent changes by detecting file overlap, incompatible assumptions, duplicated implementations, semantic conflicts, and missing combined tests. Use before merging worker branches or worktrees.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- completion-claims-auditorSkill
- existing-work-preservationSkill
- mcp-reliability-auditorSkill
- project-context-recoverySkill
- requirement-traceability-auditorSkill
- scope-drift-guardSkill
- architecture-complexity-auditorSkill
- dependency-cycle-auditorSkill
- database-schema-reviewerSkill
- data-consistency-auditorSkill
- migration-safety-reviewerSkill
- loop-breakerSkill
- reproduction-builderSkill
- root-cause-debuggerSkill
- dependency-grounding-auditorSkill
- ci-failure-investigatorSkill
- cross-platform-readiness-auditorSkill
- environment-config-auditorSkill
- environment-parity-auditorSkill
- production-readiness-auditorSkill
- documentation-accuracy-auditorSkill
- token-efficient-workflowSkill
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- dead-feature-detectorSkill
- responsive-design-auditorSkill
- ux-state-completeness-auditorSkill
- release-verification-agentSkill
- agent-tool-trust-auditorSkill
- authentication-security-auditorSkill
- authorization-boundary-auditorSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditorSkill
- injection-risk-auditorSkill
- input-validation-auditorSkill
- secret-leakage-detectorSkill
- security-misconfiguration-auditorSkill
- api-contract-auditorSkill
- integration-reality-checkerSkill
- missing-test-detectorSkill
- regression-detectorSkill
- test-quality-auditorSkill
- ui-flow-verifierSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 8
Ensure independently correct patches still form one coherent system.
- Distinctive: line 16
Only one patch exists or parallel changes are provably independent generated artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 20
Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Distinctive: line 33
Verify all branches share the intended base and capture each worker's claimed scope/evidence.
- Very specific: line 38
Run each worker's focused checks plus combined integration/build/E2E tests that cross their boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not merge merely because Git reports no textual conflicts.
- Distinctive: line 51
No unresolved overlapping responsibility or schema/API mismatch remains.
- Distinctive: line 64
If a worker's validation cannot be reproduced, mark that patch unverified and inspect/test it before relying on the claim.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
Ensure independently correct patches still form one coherent system.
When to activate
Two or more agents/branches/worktrees changed related parts of a project.
When not to activate
Only one patch exists or parallel changes are provably independent generated artifacts.
Preconditions
- Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Preserve unrelated working-tree changes and establish a baseline when the workflow can modify code.
- Identify which tools and environments are actually available; do not claim unavailable checks ran.
Required inputs
- Base commit
- Agent branches/diffs
- Assigned scopes and requirements
- Validation from each worker
Workflow
- Verify all branches share the intended base and capture each worker's claimed scope/evidence.
- Compare changed-file overlap and also dependency/API/schema overlap even when files differ.
- Detect duplicated solutions, inconsistent names/types/config keys, conflicting migrations, version bumps, generated files, and tests that assume incompatible behavior.
- Choose one canonical implementation per responsibility and integrate in dependency order.
- Resolve semantic conflicts by the authoritative requirement and repository architecture, not by keeping both versions.
- Run each worker's focused checks plus combined integration/build/E2E tests that cross their boundaries.
- Review the final diff for lost changes and delete obsolete duplicate paths.
Relevant tools
Git branches/worktrees/diff, dependency search, combined test suite.
Safety restrictions
Do not merge merely because Git reports no textual conflicts; semantic conflicts require review.
Validation
- No unresolved overlapping responsibility or schema/API mismatch remains.
- Combined tests pass after integration, not only branch-local tests.
- The final diff can trace each retained change to a requirement/worker rationale.
Expected output
- Agent change matrix
- Conflict/duplication findings
- Integration decisions
- Combined validation
Failure handling
If a worker's validation cannot be reproduced, mark that patch unverified and inspect/test it before relying on the claim.
Completion criteria
The skill is complete only when every applicable validation item above has observed evidence or is explicitly marked not executed with the concrete blocker. Do not replace missing evidence with confidence language.
Research mapping
This skill was selected from research problems: P049. See research/vibe-coding-problems.md and research/problem-evidence.csv in the Vibe Coding Skills repository.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

