authorization-boundary-auditor
Skill0 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit object, action, role, and tenant authorization boundaries after identity is established. Use for permissions, ownership, admin, organization, or multi-user features.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mrenigmatic19/claude_skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- mrenigmatic19/claude_skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- completion-claims-auditorSkill
- existing-work-preservationSkill
- mcp-reliability-auditorSkill
- multi-agent-integration-reviewerSkill
- project-context-recoverySkill
- requirement-traceability-auditorSkill
- scope-drift-guardSkill
- architecture-complexity-auditorSkill
- dependency-cycle-auditorSkill
- database-schema-reviewerSkill
- data-consistency-auditorSkill
- migration-safety-reviewerSkill
- loop-breakerSkill
- reproduction-builderSkill
- root-cause-debuggerSkill
- dependency-grounding-auditorSkill
- ci-failure-investigatorSkill
- cross-platform-readiness-auditorSkill
- environment-config-auditorSkill
- environment-parity-auditorSkill
- production-readiness-auditorSkill
- documentation-accuracy-auditorSkill
- token-efficient-workflowSkill
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- dead-feature-detectorSkill
- responsive-design-auditorSkill
- ux-state-completeness-auditorSkill
- release-verification-agentSkill
- agent-tool-trust-auditorSkill
- authentication-security-auditorSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditorSkill
- injection-risk-auditorSkill
- input-validation-auditorSkill
- secret-leakage-detectorSkill
- security-misconfiguration-auditorSkill
- api-contract-auditorSkill
- integration-reality-checkerSkill
- missing-test-detectorSkill
- regression-detectorSkill
- test-quality-auditorSkill
- ui-flow-verifierSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Distinctive: line 34
Look for IDOR/object-ownership gaps, admin-only actions, tenant boundary leaks, and client-supplied role/owner fields.
- Distinctive: line 35
Verify collection/list queries enforce the same scope as individual-object endpoints.
- Distinctive: line 36
Test allowed and denied combinations using at least two ordinary users plus privileged roles where relevant.
- Distinctive: line 37
Check background jobs, exports, websocket/subscription paths, and indirect endpoints that bypass the main handler.
- Distinctive: line 38
Verify denial has no side effect and returns a non-sensitive response.
- Distinctive: line 46
Never test against real users or production data without explicit authorization.
- Distinctive: line 50
Every protected operation has an explicit policy path.
- Distinctive: line 63
If business policy is ambiguous, identify the exact undecidable cases and do not invent permissions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
Prevent horizontal and vertical privilege escalation.
When to activate
Code decides whether an authenticated identity may read/change a resource or perform an action.
When not to activate
The change only establishes identity and does not gate resources/actions.
Preconditions
- Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Preserve unrelated working-tree changes and establish a baseline when the workflow can modify code.
- Identify which tools and environments are actually available; do not claim unavailable checks ran.
Required inputs
- Permission model
- Roles/tenants/ownership rules
- Protected operations and data model
Workflow
- List protected resources/actions and the policy expected for each role or relationship.
- Trace each server-side entry point to an authorization decision made with authoritative resource data.
- Look for IDOR/object-ownership gaps, admin-only actions, tenant boundary leaks, and client-supplied role/owner fields.
- Verify collection/list queries enforce the same scope as individual-object endpoints.
- Test allowed and denied combinations using at least two ordinary users plus privileged roles where relevant.
- Check background jobs, exports, websocket/subscription paths, and indirect endpoints that bypass the main handler.
- Verify denial has no side effect and returns a non-sensitive response.
Relevant tools
Repository/data-model search, API/integration tests, policy engine if present.
Safety restrictions
Never test against real users or production data without explicit authorization.
Validation
- Every protected operation has an explicit policy path.
- Cross-user/cross-tenant denied cases are tested.
- Client-controlled authorization fields cannot override authoritative policy.
Expected output
- Authorization matrix
- Entry-point mapping
- Escalation findings
- Executed allow/deny tests
Failure handling
If business policy is ambiguous, identify the exact undecidable cases and do not invent permissions.
Completion criteria
The skill is complete only when every applicable validation item above has observed evidence or is explicitly marked not executed with the concrete blocker. Do not replace missing evidence with confidence language.
Research mapping
This skill was selected from research problems: P015. See research/vibe-coding-problems.md and research/problem-evidence.csv in the Vibe Coding Skills repository.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

