reproduction-builder
Skill0 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create the smallest reliable reproducer for a reported software failure before attempting a fix. Use when a bug is intermittent, environment-sensitive, or not covered by a failing test.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- completion-claims-auditorSkill
- existing-work-preservationSkill
- mcp-reliability-auditorSkill
- multi-agent-integration-reviewerSkill
- project-context-recoverySkill
- requirement-traceability-auditorSkill
- scope-drift-guardSkill
- architecture-complexity-auditorSkill
- dependency-cycle-auditorSkill
- database-schema-reviewerSkill
- data-consistency-auditorSkill
- migration-safety-reviewerSkill
- loop-breakerSkill
- root-cause-debuggerSkill
- dependency-grounding-auditorSkill
- ci-failure-investigatorSkill
- cross-platform-readiness-auditorSkill
- environment-config-auditorSkill
- environment-parity-auditorSkill
- production-readiness-auditorSkill
- documentation-accuracy-auditorSkill
- token-efficient-workflowSkill
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- dead-feature-detectorSkill
- responsive-design-auditorSkill
- ux-state-completeness-auditorSkill
- release-verification-agentSkill
- agent-tool-trust-auditorSkill
- authentication-security-auditorSkill
- authorization-boundary-auditorSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditorSkill
- injection-risk-auditorSkill
- input-validation-auditorSkill
- secret-leakage-detectorSkill
- security-misconfiguration-auditorSkill
- api-contract-auditorSkill
- integration-reality-checkerSkill
- missing-test-detectorSkill
- regression-detectorSkill
- test-quality-auditorSkill
- ui-flow-verifierSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Distinctive: line 32
Write down expected behavior, observed behavior, and the minimum trigger conditions separately.
- Distinctive: line 33
Start from the nearest existing test or executable path rather than a new harness.
- Distinctive: line 34
Remove unrelated inputs and dependencies while checking that the failure remains.
- Distinctive: line 37
Run it at least twice or across the relevant boundary to confirm reliability.
- Distinctive: line 38
Only then hand off to diagnosis or fixing.
- Distinctive: line 42
Test framework, temporary fixtures, logs, environment inspection.
- Distinctive: line 46
Use synthetic or already-authorized test data.
- Distinctive: line 63
If the bug cannot be reproduced, provide a capture plan for the missing logs/state rather than fabricating a local failure.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
Convert an ambiguous bug report into an executable failing case with controlled inputs.
When to activate
A defect is reported without a stable failing test or command.
When not to activate
The task is purely explanatory or the existing test already reproduces the failure deterministically.
Preconditions
- Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Preserve unrelated working-tree changes and establish a baseline when the workflow can modify code.
- Identify which tools and environments are actually available; do not claim unavailable checks ran.
Required inputs
- Bug report and environment details
- Candidate entry point
- Relevant data/configuration
Workflow
- Write down expected behavior, observed behavior, and the minimum trigger conditions separately.
- Start from the nearest existing test or executable path rather than a new harness.
- Remove unrelated inputs and dependencies while checking that the failure remains.
- Control random seeds, time, network, filesystem, locale, and concurrency where they affect determinism.
- Turn the minimized case into a test/fixture when appropriate.
- Run it at least twice or across the relevant boundary to confirm reliability.
- Only then hand off to diagnosis or fixing.
Relevant tools
Test framework, temporary fixtures, logs, environment inspection.
Safety restrictions
Use synthetic or already-authorized test data; never copy production secrets or personal data into a fixture.
Validation
- The reproducer fails before the fix with the reported symptom.
- Unrelated setup has been removed without losing the failure.
- Known nondeterministic dependencies are controlled or explicitly documented.
Expected output
- Minimal reproduction command/test
- Required fixture/input
- Expected and observed result
- Uncontrolled environmental factors
Failure handling
If the bug cannot be reproduced, provide a capture plan for the missing logs/state rather than fabricating a local failure.
Completion criteria
The skill is complete only when every applicable validation item above has observed evidence or is explicitly marked not executed with the concrete blocker. Do not replace missing evidence with confidence language.
Research mapping
This skill was selected from research problems: P012. See research/vibe-coding-problems.md and research/problem-evidence.csv in the Vibe Coding Skills repository.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

