regression-detector
Skill0 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Detect behavior regressions introduced by a change by comparing baselines, requirements, tests, and adjacent flows. Use after a fix, refactor, dependency change, or generated patch.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- completion-claims-auditorSkill
- existing-work-preservationSkill
- mcp-reliability-auditorSkill
- multi-agent-integration-reviewerSkill
- project-context-recoverySkill
- requirement-traceability-auditorSkill
- scope-drift-guardSkill
- architecture-complexity-auditorSkill
- dependency-cycle-auditorSkill
- database-schema-reviewerSkill
- data-consistency-auditorSkill
- migration-safety-reviewerSkill
- loop-breakerSkill
- reproduction-builderSkill
- root-cause-debuggerSkill
- dependency-grounding-auditorSkill
- ci-failure-investigatorSkill
- cross-platform-readiness-auditorSkill
- environment-config-auditorSkill
- environment-parity-auditorSkill
- production-readiness-auditorSkill
- documentation-accuracy-auditorSkill
- token-efficient-workflowSkill
- accessibility-auditorSkill
- dead-feature-detectorSkill
- responsive-design-auditorSkill
- ux-state-completeness-auditorSkill
- release-verification-agentSkill
- agent-tool-trust-auditorSkill
- authentication-security-auditorSkill
- authorization-boundary-auditorSkill
- dependency-vulnerability-auditorSkill
- injection-risk-auditorSkill
- input-validation-auditorSkill
- secret-leakage-detectorSkill
- security-misconfiguration-auditorSkill
- api-contract-auditorSkill
- integration-reality-checkerSkill
- missing-test-detectorSkill
- test-quality-auditorSkill
- ui-flow-verifierSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Distinctive: line 34
Run the relevant baseline before editing when practical, then run the same checks after the change.
- Distinctive: line 37
Add a regression test for the fixed defect when it provides durable value.
- Distinctive: line 46
Never weaken or delete a failing test to make the regression report green without proving the contract changed.
- Distinctive: line 50
No previously passing relevant check fails after the patch without an accepted contract change.
- Distinctive: line 57
Before/after command evidence
- Distinctive: line 63
If a baseline cannot run in the current environment, mark that check not executed and identify the clean environment or CI target needed.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
Prove the requested behavior improved without silently breaking preserved behavior.
When to activate
A patch changes executable behavior or crosses module/API boundaries.
When not to activate
Documentation-only changes with no executable behavior and no generated artifacts.
Preconditions
- Read applicable repository instructions before edits.
- Preserve unrelated working-tree changes and establish a baseline when the workflow can modify code.
- Identify which tools and environments are actually available; do not claim unavailable checks ran.
Required inputs
- Diff or changed-file list
- Baseline tests/behavior
- Requested acceptance criteria
Workflow
- Map each changed production file to the behaviors or interfaces it can affect.
- Identify the narrow regression suite plus at least one adjacent preserved path for each high-impact change.
- Run the relevant baseline before editing when practical, then run the same checks after the change.
- Compare failures, warnings, snapshots, API shapes, persisted data, and performance guardrails that are part of the contract.
- Investigate every new failure; do not update snapshots/fixtures until the behavior change is confirmed intentional.
- Add a regression test for the fixed defect when it provides durable value.
- Report preserved behaviors separately from newly validated requirements.
Relevant tools
Version control, test runners, build/type/lint checks, API/schema comparison.
Safety restrictions
Never weaken or delete a failing test to make the regression report green without proving the contract changed.
Validation
- No previously passing relevant check fails after the patch without an accepted contract change.
- The original defect is covered when feasible.
- Snapshot/golden changes are justified by an explicit behavior change.
Expected output
- Regression matrix
- Before/after command evidence
- New or changed tests
- Unresolved regressions
Failure handling
If a baseline cannot run in the current environment, mark that check not executed and identify the clean environment or CI target needed.
Completion criteria
The skill is complete only when every applicable validation item above has observed evidence or is explicitly marked not executed with the concrete blocker. Do not replace missing evidence with confidence language.
Research mapping
This skill was selected from research problems: P009, P048. See research/vibe-coding-problems.md and research/problem-evidence.csv in the Vibe Coding Skills repository.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

