code-review-template
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
AI-powered code review with deep thinking analysis
In this repository64 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- board-workerSkill
- board-triage-specifierSkill
- create-a-skillSkill
- execdesk-action-board-prepSkill
- execdesk-action-competitor-monitorSkill
- execdesk-action-competitor-positioningSkill
- execdesk-action-content-calendarSkill
- execdesk-action-decision-frameworkSkill
- execdesk-action-growth-hack-runnerSkill
- execdesk-action-icp-profileSkill
- execdesk-action-quarterly-goals-reviewSkill
- execdesk-action-twitter-thread-drafterSkill
- execdesk-action-weekly-briefSkill
- execdesk-ceoSkill
- execdesk-chief-of-staffSkill
- execdesk-cmoSkill
- think-deepSkill
- docker-compose-devSkill
- calendar-hold-approvalSkill
- chuck-norrisSkill
- email-send-approvalSkill
- graph-ask-demoSkill
- inbox-and-agendaSkill
- meeting-brief-graphSkill
- multi-mcp-testSkill
- schedule-badge-proofSkill
- stopping-point-testSkill
- turn-log-smokeSkill
- custom-skill-templateSkill
- daily-research-briefSkill
- pr-review-pipelineSkill
- research-analysis-templateSkill
- ship-a-featureSkill
- autonomous-planSkill
- browser-toolsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deep-thinkingSkill
- first-skillSkill
- helloSkill
- implementation-planningSkill
- install-mcp-serverSkill
- masterySkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- mcp-installerSkill
- morning-briefSkill
- new-user-walkthroughSkill
- oauth-authenticationSkill
- onboardingSkill
- parallel-code-analysisSkill
- project-wizardSkill
- qa-reportSkill
- qa-testingSkill
- regression-testSkill
- self-improveSkill
- self-learningSkill
- skill-developmentSkill
- social-media-marketingSkill
- soulSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Code Review Template
Overview
Structured code review using deep thinking for thorough analysis of architecture, bugs, security, and performance.
Stopping Point 1: Review Depth
- Quick Review (3 steps) — scan for obvious issues
- Thorough Review (8 steps) — architecture, bugs, security, performance
- Deep Audit (15 steps) — comprehensive security and quality audit
<!-- AGENT_ACTIONS: {"stopping_points":[{"id":1,"title":"Review Depth","options":{"1":{"label":"Quick Review","vars":{"DEPTH":"3"},"steps":[
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"start_thinking_session","args":{"topic":"Code review of {{TOPIC}} — scan for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems","depth":"{{DEPTH}}"},"capture":{"SESSION_ID":"session_id"}},
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"add_thought","args":{"session_id":"{{SESSION_ID}}","thought":"Summarize findings: critical issues, warnings, and suggestions","nextThoughtNeeded":false}}
]},"2":{"label":"Thorough Review","vars":{"DEPTH":"8"},"steps":[
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"start_thinking_session","args":{"topic":"Thorough code review of {{TOPIC}} — analyze architecture, error handling, security, performance, and maintainability","depth":"{{DEPTH}}"},"capture":{"SESSION_ID":"session_id"}},
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"add_thought","args":{"session_id":"{{SESSION_ID}}","thought":"Continue review — examine edge cases, error paths, and security boundaries"},"loop":5,"stream_progress":true},
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"add_thought","args":{"session_id":"{{SESSION_ID}}","thought":"Final report: critical issues, recommended changes, and praise for good patterns","nextThoughtNeeded":false}}
]},"3":{"label":"Deep Audit","vars":{"DEPTH":"15"},"steps":[
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"start_thinking_session","args":{"topic":"Deep security and quality audit of {{TOPIC}} — OWASP top 10, input validation, auth, data flow, performance bottlenecks, maintainability debt","depth":"{{DEPTH}}"},"capture":{"SESSION_ID":"session_id"}},
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"add_thought","args":{"session_id":"{{SESSION_ID}}","thought":"Continue deep audit analysis"},"loop":12,"stream_progress":true},
{"server":"Vodou-Enhanced-Thinking","tool":"add_thought","args":{"session_id":"{{SESSION_ID}}","thought":"Final audit report with severity ratings, remediation steps, and risk assessment","nextThoughtNeeded":false}}
]}}}]} -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

