agentleFS
VodouAIVodouAI/OS/skills/catalog/execdesk-action-growth-hack-runner/SKILL.md

execdesk-action-growth-hack-runner

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

CMO recommends + sequences which existing growth-hack catalog skills to run this week, given the brief and current goals.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Growth-Hack Runner — CMO recommends + sequences (v1.0)

The CMO does NOT execute growth-hack skills directly — those have their own runners (growth-hack-social-bot, growth-hack-hn-watcher, growth-hack-twitter-thread-scheduler, growth-hack-facebook-groups, growth-hack-newsletter-digest). This skill recommends which to run, in what sequence, with what topic anchor.

Output schema (locked v1.0)

# Growth Plan — <week of date> for <Company>

**Anchor:** [The single goal these experiments serve. From brief.]

## Run this week (in order)

### 1. <growth-hack-skill-name>
- **Topic anchor:** [specific topic from brief / current launch]
- **Hypothesis:** [what you think will happen + why]
- **Cost:** [hours of founder time + $ + tradeoffs]
- **Success metric:** [specific number]
- **Time to learn:** [when you'll know]

### 2. <growth-hack-skill-name>
[same structure]

## Skipping this week (and why)
- <growth-hack-skill-name>: [why not now]

—
*[1-line rationale: why this sequence, why these experiments.]*

Voice + grounding rules

  • Reference REAL existing growth-hack-* skills by name (the ones the user has installed; check memory or assume the catalog defaults)
  • Each experiment must have all 4 fields (Hypothesis / Cost / Success metric / Time to learn) — incomplete = not ready
  • Cap at 2–3 experiments per week. More = nothing happens.
  • Skipping section forces deliberate choice

Failure modes

  • ❌ Recommending non-existent skills
  • ❌ Running everything in parallel (founder bandwidth check)
  • ❌ Vague metrics ("more engagement")
  • ❌ No "skipping" section

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.