agentleFS
VodouAIVodouAI/OS/skills/my-skills/meeting-brief-graph/SKILL.md

meeting-brief-graph

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Before each meeting, a 200-word brief on the attendees from your own memory — every sentence cites the chunk it rests on, unknown names are reported, nothing is invented.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Meeting brief (graph form)

PLAN-PEOPLE-PAGES P2 — the graph form of the meeting brief. recipe.txt is the source; actions.json is vodou-core recipe compile recipe.txt and is not edited by hand.

What it does, in order:

  1. calendar — the next two hours of the primary Google calendar ({{NOW}} → {{NOW_PLUS_2H}}).
  2. who — every attendee and organizer name is looked up in your memory with vodou-memory.entities_lookup. Read-only: a name memory does not know comes back as no memory of, and no entity is ever created from an invite.
  3. brief — at most 200 words. Every factual sentence ends with the [chunk:<id>] it rests on; unknown attendees get a no memory of line; an empty window is exactly NOTHING_TO_REPORT.
  4. check — has_source, in a fresh context: a brief with an unattributed claim line is blocked.

There is no ask me:. Nothing in this graph sends; the reply is delivered by the skill's delivery mode, and a NOTHING_TO_REPORT reply is kept in the console and never forwarded to a channel.

The scheduled twin. On 2026-09-10 the scheduler runs graph skills through brain /skill with no delivery and no verdict beyond exit status, so the copy that runs on the clock is the console skill meeting-brief (skills_meta, delivery via delivery_mode, cron */30 12-22 * * 1-5 — the scheduler's clock is UTC; that is weekdays 08:00–18:00 EDT). Its prompt asks for the same shape, and the scheduler grades every reply with memory::entities::grade_citations: zero citations after consulting memory is could_not / no_sources, a cited chunk that does not exist is degraded / partial_sources, NOTHING_TO_REPORT is did_the_job / nothing_to_report. Flow 16 reads those grades.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.