execdesk-action-decision-framework
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
CEO produces a structured one-page decision doc for hire/fire/pivot/pricing/raise calls. Single recommendation + cost of being wrong + reversibility test.
In this repository64 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- board-workerSkill
- board-triage-specifierSkill
- create-a-skillSkill
- execdesk-action-board-prepSkill
- execdesk-action-competitor-monitorSkill
- execdesk-action-competitor-positioningSkill
- execdesk-action-content-calendarSkill
- execdesk-action-growth-hack-runnerSkill
- execdesk-action-icp-profileSkill
- execdesk-action-quarterly-goals-reviewSkill
- execdesk-action-twitter-thread-drafterSkill
- execdesk-action-weekly-briefSkill
- execdesk-ceoSkill
- execdesk-chief-of-staffSkill
- execdesk-cmoSkill
- think-deepSkill
- docker-compose-devSkill
- calendar-hold-approvalSkill
- chuck-norrisSkill
- email-send-approvalSkill
- graph-ask-demoSkill
- inbox-and-agendaSkill
- meeting-brief-graphSkill
- multi-mcp-testSkill
- schedule-badge-proofSkill
- stopping-point-testSkill
- turn-log-smokeSkill
- code-review-templateSkill
- custom-skill-templateSkill
- daily-research-briefSkill
- pr-review-pipelineSkill
- research-analysis-templateSkill
- ship-a-featureSkill
- autonomous-planSkill
- browser-toolsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deep-thinkingSkill
- first-skillSkill
- helloSkill
- implementation-planningSkill
- install-mcp-serverSkill
- masterySkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- mcp-installerSkill
- morning-briefSkill
- new-user-walkthroughSkill
- oauth-authenticationSkill
- onboardingSkill
- parallel-code-analysisSkill
- project-wizardSkill
- qa-reportSkill
- qa-testingSkill
- regression-testSkill
- self-improveSkill
- self-learningSkill
- skill-developmentSkill
- social-media-marketingSkill
- soulSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 29
NOT a "framework" in the consulting sense.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Decision Framework — CEO one-pager (v1.0)
NOT a "framework" in the consulting sense. The CEO doesn't fill in 2x2 matrices. This skill produces a one-page decision doc anchored on one recommendation, the cost of being wrong, and a reversibility test.
Output schema (locked v1.0)
# Decision: <The decision>, <date>
**Recommendation:** [What to do. One sentence. Conviction-calibrated.]
## What I'm seeing
- [Brief-grounded fact]
- [Brief-grounded fact]
- [Contrarian or non-obvious angle]
## Cost of being wrong
- **If I do this and it's wrong:** [specific consequence — money, time, relationship]
- **If I don't do this and that's wrong:** [specific consequence]
## Reversibility test
- [Is this a 1-way or 2-way door? If 2-way, just decide. If 1-way, what's the smaller test that costs less to reverse?]
## What I'd do this week
[ONE specific move. Not a list.]
—
*[1-line: what would change my mind.]*Voice + grounding rules
- Lead with the recommendation. No "let's think about this systematically" preamble.
- Conviction-calibrated ("I'd bet 70/30," "high conviction," "I'm guessing here")
- Reversibility test forces a smaller-test framing for big calls
- "What would change my mind" closer keeps the recommendation honest
Failure modes
- ❌ "Here are 5 considerations to weigh" — not a framework, just hedging
- ❌ Pros/cons list with no pick — pick one
- ❌ Skipping the cost-of-being-wrong section
- ❌ Multiple "what I'd do" actions
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

