brainstorming
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
새 기능 설계 탐색. Hard gate — 승인 없이 코드 작성 불가. 접근법 비교·트레이드오프 논의 시 사용.
190 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ainurdev/mystical-assistanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alunadev/ald-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkilladdskill
Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkillapply-firmware
Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +6 more from ryanportfolio
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 190
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- JetBrains/thinkrail★ 7.9ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9ksame name
- BetterTyped/react-zoom-pan-pinch★ 1.9ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bstackSkill
- api-reviewSkill
- arch-guardSkill
- architectSkill
- auditSkill
- collaborationSkill
- conventionsSkill
- investigateSkill
- metricsSkill
- observabilitySkill
- perfSkill
- persistenceSkill
- securitySkill
- shipSkill
- specSkill
- spring-coreSkill
- subagent-drivenSkill
- testSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
Files
/brainstorming — 설계 탐색 스킬
새 기능이나 시스템을 구현하기 전, 설계를 탐색하고 사용자의 승인을 받는다. Hard Gate: 승인 없이 코드 작성, 스캐폴딩, 구현 액션 일체 불가.
When to use
- 새 기능 아이디어 탐색
- "어떻게 구현할까" 수준의 초기 논의
- 접근법이 여러 개 존재하고 트레이드오프 비교가 필요할 때
- 기존 코드 없이 처음부터 설계할 때
동작 순서 (반드시 준수)
1단계: 프로젝트 컨텍스트 파악
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md읽기docs/specs/기존 스펙 확인- 관련 패키지 구조 파악
2단계: 명확화 질문
구현 전 반드시 확인:
- 이 기능의 핵심 목적은?
- 기존 코드와 어떻게 연결되는가?
- 성능/보안 제약이 있는가?
- 우선순위 (빠른 구현 vs 확장성)?
3단계: 접근법 2-3가지 제시
각 접근법에 포함:
**접근법 A: [이름]**
- 설명: 한 줄 요약
- 장점: ...
- 단점: ...
- 적합한 경우: ...4단계: 설계 문서 작성 (사용자 승인 후)
승인된 접근법을 바탕으로:
docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-{topic}-design.md포함 내용:
- 선택한 접근법과 이유
- 도메인 모델 (Entity, VO, 관계)
- 레이어별 책임
- API 엔드포인트 초안
- DB 스키마 변경
- 열린 질문
5단계: /spec 연계
설계 문서 작성 완료 후 → /spec으로 공식 FEAT-NNN 스펙 문서화 권장.
Hard Gate 규칙
다음 중 어느 것도 승인 전에 하지 않는다:
- 코드 작성
- 파일 생성 (설계 문서 제외)
- 프로젝트 스캐폴딩
- 패키지/의존성 추가
git commit
승인 = 사용자가 명시적으로 "이 접근법으로 진행해", "좋아", "승인" 등으로 확인한 경우.
/architect 와의 차이
| /brainstorming | /architect | |
| 대상 | 처음부터 설계 | 기존 코드 검토 |
| 코드 필요 | 없어도 됨 | 있어야 함 |
| 결과물 | 설계 탐색 문서 | 구체적 리팩토링 제안 |
| 진입 시점 | 구현 전 | 구현 중/후 |
References
- docs/NAMING.md — DDD/Clean Architecture 역할 명명 + 패키지 구조 + 레퍼런스 레포
- docs/STYLE_GUIDE.md — 원칙 (Karpathy 4 + 동료 협업 + 정량)
- docs/RED_FLAGS.md — 안티패턴
- docs/LAYER_RULES.md — 레이어 규칙
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

