investigate
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
원인 불명 버그·예외·성능 저하의 체계적 분석. 스코프 freeze 원칙 적용.
128 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lohi-ai/babysittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- charles-adedotun/sre-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- NemesLaszlo/claude-code-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- haoyisun/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- GeiserX/sstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pfangueiro/claude-code-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use pair-agent, plan-devex-review and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
seek888Skillpair-agent
Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".
Also in 10 projects that use this
seek888Skillplan-devex-review
Interactive developer experience plan review. Explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors, designs magical moments, and traces friction points before scoring. Three modes: DX EXPANSION (competitive advantage), DX POLISH (bulletproof every touchpoint), DX TRIAGE (critical gaps only). Use when asked to "DX review", "developer experience audit", "devex review", or "API design review". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan for developer-facing products (APIs, CLIs, SDKs, libraries, platforms, docs). (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx review", "developer experience review", "devex review", "devex audit", "API design review", "onboarding review".
Also in 13 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 7 projects that use this
ayudaySkillsetup-deploy
Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".
Also in 14 projects that use this
ayudaySkillcso
Chief Security Officer mode. Performs OWASP Top 10 audit, STRIDE threat modeling, attack surface analysis, auth flow verification, secret detection, dependency CVE scanning, supply chain risk assessment, and data classification review. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".
Also in 17 projects that use this
ramybarsoumSkilldocument-release
Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped.
Also in 18 projects that use this
- +1 more from seek888
Other versions128 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 128
- recharts/recharts★ 28ksame name
- gitkraken/vscode-gitlens★ 10ksame name
- vercel/eve★ 5.8ksame name
- rilldata/rill★ 3ksame name
- DenchHQ/DenchClaw★ 1.7ksame name
- DenchHQ/ironclaw★ 1.7ksame name
- ceedaragents/cyrus★ 888same name
- cyrusagents/cyrus★ 888same name
- rommapp/argosy-launcher★ 710same name
- mr-daedalium/ostack-saas★ 108same name
118 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bstackSkill
- api-reviewSkill
- arch-guardSkill
- architectSkill
- auditSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- collaborationSkill
- conventionsSkill
- metricsSkill
- observabilitySkill
- perfSkill
- persistenceSkill
- securitySkill
- shipSkill
- specSkill
- spring-coreSkill
- subagent-drivenSkill
- testSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
Files
/investigate — 버그 탐색 스킬
원인 불명 버그, 예외 추적, 예상치 못한 동작을 체계적으로 분석한다. 스코프 freeze 원칙: 탐색 중 발견한 관련 없는 코드 냄새는 메모만 하고 건드리지 않는다.
When to use
- 예외 발생 원인 불명
- 특정 조건에서만 재현되는 버그
- 성능이 갑자기 저하된 경우
- 예상과 다른 데이터 상태
- 로그에 오류가 없는데 동작이 이상한 경우
탐색 프로세스 (반드시 순서 준수)
1단계: 스코프 정의 (freeze)
- 재현 조건을 명확히 서술
- 영향받는 레이어/모듈 범위 확정
- 이 범위 밖은 이번 작업에서 수정하지 않음
2단계: 증거 수집
# 관련 로그 확인
grep -n "ERROR\|WARN\|Exception" logs/application.log | tail -50
# DB 상태 스냅샷
# 문제 발생 시점의 데이터 상태 확인
# 최근 변경 이력
git log --oneline -20 -- src/main/java/path/to/affected/3단계: 가설 수립
- 가설 1: [가장 가능성 높은 원인]
- 가설 2: [차순위 원인]
- 가설 3: [외부 요인]
각 가설을 검증하는 최소 재현 코드 작성.
4단계: 원인 확정
- 재현 테스트 작성 (버그를 증명하는 failing test)
- 원인 코드 라인 특정
5단계: 수정 및 검증
- 최소 변경으로 수정
- 재현 테스트가 통과하는지 확인
- 회귀 방지를 위해 테스트 유지
6단계: failure-log.json 기록 (필수)
원인이 확정되면 docs/lessons/failure-log.json의 failures 배열에 추가:
{
"id": "FL-NNN",
"date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"skill": "해당 도메인 스킬명",
"symptom": "관찰된 현상",
"cause": "근본 원인",
"attempted": ["시도했으나 실패한 방법들"],
"resolution": "실제 해결 방법",
"preventionRule": "다음에 반복하지 않기 위한 규칙",
"addedToSkill": false
}기록 완료 후 → /writing-skills 스킬로 해당 SKILL.md 업데이트 권장.
자주 발생하는 버그 패턴
트랜잭션 관련
LazyInitializationException: 트랜잭션 외부에서 Lazy 접근 →/persistence- Dirty Checking 미동작: 트랜잭션 없이 Entity 수정
OptimisticLockException: 동시 수정 충돌
Spring 관련
BeanCreationException: 의존성 순환 또는 누락- AOP 미적용: self-invocation (
this.method()호출) - 프로파일 미적용:
spring.profiles.active누락
비동기 관련
@Async트랜잭션 미전파: 새 트랜잭션 시작 필요- CompletableFuture 예외 묻힘:
.exceptionally()누락
출력 형식
## 버그 리포트
**증상**: [사용자가 보고한 현상]
**재현 조건**: [최소 재현 조건]
**원인**: [특정된 코드 위치와 이유]
**수정**: [변경된 코드]
**검증**: [통과한 테스트 이름]
**사이드 이펙트 없음 확인**: [영향 범위 분석]발견한 관련 없는 이슈
탐색 중 발견한 개선점은 수정하지 말고 메모:
# TODO (이번 범위 밖)
- OrderService:123 — 불필요한 조회 발견 → /perf 스킬로 별도 작업References
- docs/STYLE_GUIDE.md — 원칙 (Karpathy 4 + 동료 협업 + 정량)
- docs/RED_FLAGS.md — 안티패턴
- docs/LAYER_RULES.md — 레이어 규칙
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

