agentleFS
KaratussKaratuss/bstack/skills/spec/SKILL.md

spec

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

기능 스펙·ADR·API 계약 문서화(docs/specs/). 설계 확정 후 구현 전 사용. /brainstorming 권장 선행.

168 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use backprop, ios-clean and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JuliusBrusseeSkill

    backprop

    Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • bastosSkill

    ios-design-review

    Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Saqlain-811

The file

Files
SKILL.md

/spec — 스펙 문서 / ADR 스킬

기능 스펙, 아키텍처 결정 기록(ADR), API 계약 문서를 docs/specs/에 관리한다.

When to use

  • /brainstorming 완료 후 설계 확정 시 (권장 경로)
  • 새 기능 구현 전 스펙 문서화
  • 아키텍처 결정 사항 기록 (ADR)
  • 기존 스펙 문서 업데이트
  • 설계 논의 결과 문서화

/brainstorming 없이 진입 시: 설계 탐색 없이 바로 스펙 작성. 요구사항이 명확하면 OK. 불명확하면 /brainstorming 먼저 권장.

문서 위치 규칙

docs/specs/
├── FEAT-001-order-system.md       # 기능 스펙
├── FEAT-002-payment-integration.md
├── ADR-001-use-event-sourcing.md  # 아키텍처 결정
├── ADR-002-jwt-vs-session.md
└── API-v1-contracts.md            # API 계약

기능 스펙 템플릿

# FEAT-NNN: [기능명]

## 상태
- [ ] Draft | [ ] Review | [x] Approved | [ ] Implemented

## 배경
[왜 이 기능이 필요한지]

## 목표
- [달성하려는 것]

## 비목표
- [이번 범위에서 제외되는 것]

## 설계

### 도메인 모델
[핵심 엔티티, 값 객체, 관계]

### API 엔드포인트
[새로 추가되는 엔드포인트 목록]

### 데이터베이스 변경
[DDL 변경 사항]

### 이벤트
[발행/구독 이벤트 목록]

## 구현 체크리스트
- [ ] 도메인 모델
- [ ] Repository
- [ ] Service
- [ ] Controller
- [ ] 테스트
- [ ] 마이그레이션

## 열린 질문
- [미결 사항]

ADR 템플릿

# ADR-NNN: [결정 제목]

## 날짜
2024-MM-DD

## 상태
Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-NNN

## 컨텍스트
[이 결정이 필요한 배경과 문제 상황]

## 결정
[무엇을 결정했는지]

## 결과
### 장점
- [이 결정의 이점]

### 단점
- [이 결정의 트레이드오프]

### 대안으로 고려한 것
- [검토했지만 선택하지 않은 옵션들과 이유]

스킬 동작

  1. docs/specs/ 디렉터리 내 기존 문서 읽기
  2. 사용자가 요청한 스펙/ADR 신규 작성 또는 기존 업데이트
  3. docs/ARCHITECTURE.md에 새 결정 반영이 필요한지 확인
  4. 파일명 규칙: FEAT-NNN-kebab-case.md 또는 ADR-NNN-kebab-case.md

주의

  • 스펙은 코드 변경 전에 작성 (설계 먼저, 구현 나중)
  • 구현 완료 후 스펙의 체크리스트 업데이트
  • 아키텍처 변경 시 반드시 ADR 작성

References

  • docs/STYLE_GUIDE.md — 원칙 (Karpathy 4 + 동료 협업 + 정량)
  • docs/RED_FLAGS.md — 안티패턴
  • docs/LAYER_RULES.md — 레이어 규칙

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.