agentleFS
KaratussKaratuss/bstack/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md

writing-skills

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

실패 케이스→SKILL.md prevention rule 추가. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR 적용. /investigate 완료 후 사용.

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • obraSkill

    diagnosing-superpowers

    Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • kntismSkill

    condition-based-waiting

    Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • aaddrickSkill

    writing-agents

    Use when creating new agents, editing existing agents, or defining specialized subagent roles for the Task tool

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • frankxaiSkill

    defense-in-depth

    Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from Leodorareluctant259

The file

Files
SKILL.md

/writing-skills — 스킬 TDD (실패 → SKILL.md 업데이트)

실패 케이스를 "failing test"로 삼아 관련 SKILL.md에 prevention rule을 추가한다. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR 사이클을 process documentation에 적용.

When to use

  • /investigate가 실패 원인을 확정하고 docs/lessons/failure-log.json에 기록한 후
  • 기존 SKILL.md에 해당 패턴이 없는 경우
  • 새 스킬을 처음 만들 때 (배포 전 테스트 필수)

RED-GREEN-REFACTOR 사이클

RED — 실패 케이스 확인

docs/lessons/failure-log.json 읽기
→ addedToSkill: false 인 항목 식별
→ 해당 skill 필드 확인 (어떤 SKILL.md를 업데이트해야 하는지)
→ 현재 SKILL.md에 prevention rule이 없음을 확인 (= failing test)

GREEN — SKILL.md 업데이트

해당 skills/{name}/SKILL.md 읽기
→ "자주 발생하는 문제" 또는 관련 섹션에 항목 추가:

| 증상 | 원인 | 해결 |
|---|---|---|
| {symptom} | {cause} | {resolution} |

→ 필요하면 코드 예시도 추가
→ failure-log.json의 addedToSkill: true 로 변경

REFACTOR — 중복/유사 패턴 통합

같은 섹션에 유사한 항목이 3개 이상이면:
→ 공통 원칙으로 통합
→ 중복 항목 제거
→ SKILL.md 가독성 유지

새 스킬 작성 시 원칙

설명 형식 (Iron Law)

# 올바른 예
description: "Use when debugging unknown exceptions or unexpected behavior in Spring Boot apps"

# 잘못된 예 (절대 금지)
description: "Follows a 5-step process: scope freeze, evidence collection, hypothesis..."

트리거 조건만 기술. 워크플로우 요약 금지 — Claude가 설명을 읽고 스킬 본문을 건너뜀.

배포 전 테스트 체크리스트

  • 실제로 트리거해서 동작 확인
  • 다른 스킬과 진입 조건이 겹치지 않음
  • SKILL.md 본문에 구체적 코드 예시 포함
  • "자주 발생하는 문제" 섹션 있음

출력 형식

## 업데이트 완료

- 대상: skills/{name}/SKILL.md
- 추가된 항목: {symptom} → {preventionRule}
- failure-log.json FL-{id} → addedToSkill: true 마킹
- LESSONS_LEARNED.md 반영 여부: [예/아니오]

LESSONS_LEARNED.md 반영 기준

단순 증상-해결 패턴은 SKILL.md만 업데이트. 다음 경우엔 docs/lessons/LESSONS_LEARNED.md에도 추가:

  • 여러 스킬에 걸쳐 영향을 미치는 패턴
  • 설계 수준의 결정 (레이어 구조, 트랜잭션 경계 등)
  • 팀 전체가 알아야 할 운영 경험

References

  • docs/STYLE_GUIDE.md — 원칙 (Karpathy 4 + 동료 협업 + 정량)
  • docs/RED_FLAGS.md — 안티패턴
  • docs/LAYER_RULES.md — 레이어 규칙

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.