agentleFS
IamK77IamK77/Skill/skills/surface/bearings/SKILL.md

bearings

Skill2 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Explore frontend architecture by reframing journeys, ownership, and the experience of time. Use before committing a product direction, not as a compulsory frontend architecture checklist.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Treat the experience as a conversation, a workbench, or a guided expedition.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    Read selectively when a thread needs another perspective or a concrete technique.

    line 50

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Copyright 2026 IamK77 — Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See ./LICENSE and ./NOTICE · https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->

bearings

Explore frontend architecture by reframing journeys, ownership, and the experience of time. Use before committing a product direction, not as a compulsory frontend architecture checklist.

Starting point

A frontend is one interpretation of a user journey. Change the story of where the user is, what they know, or what waiting means, and a different architecture may become natural.

Bring a question, fragment, reference, or tension. Follow whichever association becomes useful; these invitations are not a sequence to complete. Speculation should remain distinguishable from an observed fact.

Thought experiments

Change the journey metaphor

Treat the experience as a conversation, a workbench, or a guided expedition. What should persist, what should be visible, and what can remain unfinished in each?

Design under a different clock

Imagine instant responses, intermittent connectivity, then hour-long jobs. Invent continuity for each world rather than hiding every delay behind a spinner.

Move ownership

Imagine the URL owns the workspace, the server owns it, or the person carries it as a local document. What new sharing, recovery, and collaboration behaviours appear?

A possible turn

A reporting product begins as a dashboard. Treating it as a notebook suggests saved questions and annotations; treating it as a control room suggests live exceptions; treating it as correspondence suggests scheduled narratives. The rendering strategy follows the chosen experience, not the other way around.

Leave the space open

Offer a few genuinely different possibilities, a sketch, an analogy, or a sharper question when useful. Do not turn every prompt into a scored diagnostic, a completion gate, or a demand for an action plan. The human may choose a direction, combine them, or leave the question open.

Keel can build one selected journey end to end. Wellspring explores state representations; neither requires a certificate from this lens.

Optional references

Read selectively when a thread needs another perspective or a concrete technique. The notes supply possibilities, examples, and limits; none is a prerequisite or a requirement to close the exploration.

  • Navigate by the experience being proposed
  • Different meanings of better
  • What does the surface promise during uncertainty?
  • Use context without inventing the requirement
  • Authorship and continuity in a frontend
  • Different stories for the same frontend

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.