assay
Skill2 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Build regression tests around observable behaviour and demonstrate that they detect the fault. Use for test design, missing coverage, and validating a code change.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- venhdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Caleb-Boddington/assaytheir own version, first seen Aug 24, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- venhdev/skills★ 1same name
- Caleb-Boddington/assay★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- canonSkill
- colorSkill
- formSkill
- graphicsSkill
- layoutSkill
- motionSkill
- pilotSkill
- systemsSkill
- typeSkill
- holdfastSkill
- aegisSkill
- flightlineSkill
- gaugeSkill
- groundworkSkill
- gungnirSkill
- husbandrySkill
- load-bearingSkill
- pilotSkill
- plumbSkill
- stationkeepingSkill
- crucibleSkill
- envoySkill
- forgeSkill
- ledgerSkill
- prospectSkill
- reckoningSkill
- forageSkill
- touchstoneSkill
- bearingsSkill
- bulwarkSkill
- keelSkill
- liverySkill
- lookoutSkill
- pilotSkill
- seaworthySkill
- trialsSkill
- wellspringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 28
Before starting, inspect the project and bind TEST_CMD to its real trusted command with --var 'TEST_CMD=<actual command>'.
- Very specific: line 40
Test level and any doubles preserve the behaviour under test.
- Very specific: line 43
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance contract --run "$RUN".
- Distinctive: line 47
Write the smallest useful regression.
- Very specific: line 56
Run the bound sensor: checklist verify exercise --run "$RUN".
- Distinctive: line 75
If the environment is unavailable, keep the test and report it unrun.
- Very specific: line 77
If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending.
- Very specific: line 83
After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN".
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!--
Copyright 2026 IamK77 — Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
See ./LICENSE and ./NOTICE · https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-->assay
Build regression tests around observable behaviour and demonstrate that they detect the fault. Use for test design, missing coverage, and validating a code change.
Inputs
Behaviour or defect to protect; observable acceptance examples; target project; its actual test command and supported test environment.
Run record
Use checklist 0.5 or newer for this SOP. Reading or reloading the skill must not reset work. For a new task, run checklist init "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}" --new --path "/absolute/project"; retain its returned ID as RUN. For existing work, use checklist resume "$RUN", then checklist show --run "$RUN". Outside Claude, replace the skill-directory variable with this directory’s actual path.
Commands below record work after it is done. Replace evidence placeholders with concise artifact locations and observations. Manual confirmations are not independent proof; a sensor pass covers only the command and inputs it observed. verify does not close a stage; advance checks that its required readings are fulfilled. Use report --run "$RUN" for the retained history.
Before starting, inspect the project and bind TEST_CMD to its real trusted command with --var 'TEST_CMD=<actual command>'. Do not use an echo/no-op to produce a green result. checklist resume "$RUN" --var 'TEST_CMD=<new command>' changes the binding and invalidates earlier readings; commands and output are stored locally, so do not bind secrets.
Procedure
contract
Translate the requirement into examples and identify the cheapest level that observes the real behaviour. Name external boundaries and decide which may be substituted without replacing the subject of the test.
Record these artifacts after doing the work:
- Acceptance examples name observable outcomes and relevant edge cases.
checklist check contract behaviour --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>" - Test level and any doubles preserve the behaviour under test.
checklist check contract boundary --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance contract --run "$RUN".
exercise
Write the smallest useful regression. Observe it fail for the intended reason before fixing the implementation, or introduce a controlled fault if the feature already works. Restore the code exactly, then run the selected suite.
Record these artifacts after doing the work:
- The test failed on the targeted fault, not on setup or unrelated breakage.
checklist check exercise red --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>" - Controlled faults are removed and the intended implementation is restored.
checklist check exercise restored --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
Run the bound sensor: checklist verify exercise --run "$RUN". A failed or unavailable command is not a successful review.
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance exercise --run "$RUN".
handoff
Review whether assertions survive a legitimate refactor, remove redundant fixtures, and report exactly what ran. Leave new tests in the repository.
Record these artifacts after doing the work:
- Regression tests are retained with maintainable fixtures.
checklist check handoff durable --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>" - Result summary distinguishes executed checks, exclusions, and remaining risk.
checklist check handoff limits --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance handoff --run "$RUN".
Branches
If the environment is unavailable, keep the test and report it unrun; do not record a passing sensor. For nondeterministic behaviour, control seeds/time or use a justified statistical assertion instead of repeating until green.
If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending. A changed requirement may need a new run; an accepted checklist edit uses resume "$RUN" --refresh and requires fresh readings. To abandon work, use checklist reset --run "$RUN" --reason "<reason>"; history is retained.
Completion
A retained test that has been seen to fail and then pass, plus suite results and named gaps. Groundwork supplies acceptance examples; this skill does not invent missing requirements.
After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN". This archives the result without deleting its history; it does not authorise any external action.
Reference shelf
Open the technique relevant to the current step. These notes provide concrete methods and examples, not additional phases; this entrypoint defines the run's completion conditions.
- Tests that observe the wrong thing
- Coverage, fault sensitivity, and gaps
- Choosing a test around a risk
- Making failures reproducible
- An inspectable verification record
- Fit tests to the repository's language and conventions
- Independent tests and shared resources
- Construct a probe for one behavioural claim
- Properties and generated cases
- Substitute boundaries without replacing the subject
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

