ledger
Skill2 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Write a reproducible experimental plan for a chosen research question. Use after direction selection to define comparisons, data boundaries, metrics, and resource limits.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pche-broken-artist/forge-of-thoughttheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- rufait77/ledgertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- simota/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
- realdeal88/ledger-fatheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- runxhq/runxtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ForeignerfromJupiter/foreigners-povtheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use research and release.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
NVIDIASkillresearch
Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillrelease
Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- runxhq/runx★ 97same name
- simota/agent-skills★ 96same name
- pche-broken-artist/forge-of-thought★ 12same name
- Dupflo/decision-ledger★ 6same name
- ForeignerfromJupiter/foreigners-pov★ 2same name
- qsunyi/skills★ 2same name
- daviesluo/ledger-skill★ 1same name
- eternal-roman/ledger★ 1same name
- ba0918/claude-skills★ 0same name
- kaofelix/ledger★ 0same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- canonSkill
- colorSkill
- formSkill
- graphicsSkill
- layoutSkill
- motionSkill
- pilotSkill
- systemsSkill
- typeSkill
- holdfastSkill
- aegisSkill
- assaySkill
- flightlineSkill
- gaugeSkill
- groundworkSkill
- gungnirSkill
- husbandrySkill
- load-bearingSkill
- pilotSkill
- plumbSkill
- stationkeepingSkill
- crucibleSkill
- envoySkill
- forgeSkill
- prospectSkill
- reckoningSkill
- forageSkill
- touchstoneSkill
- bearingsSkill
- bulwarkSkill
- keelSkill
- liverySkill
- lookoutSkill
- pilotSkill
- seaworthySkill
- trialsSkill
- wellspringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Write a reproducible experimental plan for a chosen research question.
- Very specific: line 41
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance question --run "$RUN".
- Distinctive: line 71
When the mechanism is still unsettled, return to prospect or crucible.
- Very specific: line 73
If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending.
- Very specific: line 79
After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN".
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!--
Copyright 2026 IamK77 — Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0.
See ./LICENSE and ./NOTICE · https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
-->ledger
Write a reproducible experimental plan for a chosen research question. Use after direction selection to define comparisons, data boundaries, metrics, and resource limits.
Inputs
Chosen hypothesis; method candidates and baselines; available data; resource budget; decision the experiment should inform.
Run record
Use checklist 0.5 or newer for this SOP. Reading or reloading the skill must not reset work. For a new task, run checklist init "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}" --new --path "/absolute/project"; retain its returned ID as RUN. For existing work, use checklist resume "$RUN", then checklist show --run "$RUN". Outside Claude, replace the skill-directory variable with this directory’s actual path.
Commands below record work after it is done. Replace evidence placeholders with concise artifact locations and observations. Manual confirmations are not independent proof; a sensor pass covers only the command and inputs it observed. verify does not close a stage; advance checks that its required readings are fulfilled. Use report --run "$RUN" for the retained history.
Procedure
question
State the claim under test and plausible alternatives. Define what observation would weaken it, and which comparison distinguishes the mechanisms.
Record these artifacts after doing the work:
- Hypothesis, alternatives, and falsifying outcomes are explicit.
checklist check question claim --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>" - Baselines and comparisons address the stated claim.
checklist check question comparison --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance question --run "$RUN".
design
Specify data partitions, sampling, seeds, metrics, uncertainty treatment, ablations, and stopping/resource limits. Keep exploratory work distinct from final evaluation.
Record these artifacts after doing the work:
- Data boundaries, metrics, repetitions, and analysis are specified.
checklist check design protocol --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>" - Ablations, stopping conditions, and resource limits are recorded.
checklist check design budget --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance design --run "$RUN".
freeze
Review feasibility and leakage risks, then version the agreed plan before the committed run. Record later deviations rather than rewriting the original plan to fit results.
Record these artifacts after doing the work:
- Feasibility and leakage review issues are resolved or named.
checklist check freeze review --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>" - The agreed plan is versioned with a deviation-recording convention.
checklist check freeze version --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance freeze --run "$RUN".
Branches
When the mechanism is still unsettled, return to prospect or crucible. Small feasibility experiments may precede commitment, but label their role and do not present them as untouched evaluation data.
If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending. A changed requirement may need a new run; an accepted checklist edit uses resume "$RUN" --refresh and requires fresh readings. To abandon work, use checklist reset --run "$RUN" --reason "<reason>"; history is retained.
Completion
A versioned plan that forge can execute and reckoning can audit, with no fabricated results.
After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN". This archives the result without deleting its history; it does not authorise any external action.
Reference shelf
Open the technique relevant to the current step. These notes provide concrete methods and examples, not additional phases; this entrypoint defines the run's completion conditions.
- Design informative comparisons within a real budget
- Choose data and baselines for the stated population
- Connect a chosen claim to planned evidence
- Specify what will be measured and compared
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

