agentleFS
IamK77IamK77/Skill/skills/inquiry/ledger/SKILL.md

ledger

Skill2 starsChanged 31 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Write a reproducible experimental plan for a chosen research question. Use after direction selection to define comparisons, data boundaries, metrics, and resource limits.

13 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use research and release.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • NVIDIASkill

    research

    Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    release

    Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write a reproducible experimental plan for a chosen research question.

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance question --run "$RUN".

    line 41
  3. Distinctive:

    When the mechanism is still unsettled, return to prospect or crucible.

    line 71
  4. Very specific:

    If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending.

    line 73
  5. Very specific:

    After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN".

    line 79

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Copyright 2026 IamK77 — Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See ./LICENSE and ./NOTICE · https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -->

ledger

Write a reproducible experimental plan for a chosen research question. Use after direction selection to define comparisons, data boundaries, metrics, and resource limits.

Inputs

Chosen hypothesis; method candidates and baselines; available data; resource budget; decision the experiment should inform.

Run record

Use checklist 0.5 or newer for this SOP. Reading or reloading the skill must not reset work. For a new task, run checklist init "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}" --new --path "/absolute/project"; retain its returned ID as RUN. For existing work, use checklist resume "$RUN", then checklist show --run "$RUN". Outside Claude, replace the skill-directory variable with this directory’s actual path.

Commands below record work after it is done. Replace evidence placeholders with concise artifact locations and observations. Manual confirmations are not independent proof; a sensor pass covers only the command and inputs it observed. verify does not close a stage; advance checks that its required readings are fulfilled. Use report --run "$RUN" for the retained history.

Procedure

question

State the claim under test and plausible alternatives. Define what observation would weaken it, and which comparison distinguishes the mechanisms.

Record these artifacts after doing the work:

  • Hypothesis, alternatives, and falsifying outcomes are explicit. checklist check question claim --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
  • Baselines and comparisons address the stated claim. checklist check question comparison --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"

When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance question --run "$RUN".

design

Specify data partitions, sampling, seeds, metrics, uncertainty treatment, ablations, and stopping/resource limits. Keep exploratory work distinct from final evaluation.

Record these artifacts after doing the work:

  • Data boundaries, metrics, repetitions, and analysis are specified. checklist check design protocol --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
  • Ablations, stopping conditions, and resource limits are recorded. checklist check design budget --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"

When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance design --run "$RUN".

freeze

Review feasibility and leakage risks, then version the agreed plan before the committed run. Record later deviations rather than rewriting the original plan to fit results.

Record these artifacts after doing the work:

  • Feasibility and leakage review issues are resolved or named. checklist check freeze review --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"
  • The agreed plan is versioned with a deviation-recording convention. checklist check freeze version --run "$RUN" --evidence "<artifact and observation>"

When this stage is fulfilled: checklist advance freeze --run "$RUN".

Branches

When the mechanism is still unsettled, return to prospect or crucible. Small feasibility experiments may precede commitment, but label their role and do not present them as untouched evaluation data.

If an input or permission is missing, name the blocker and leave the relevant item pending. A changed requirement may need a new run; an accepted checklist edit uses resume "$RUN" --refresh and requires fresh readings. To abandon work, use checklist reset --run "$RUN" --reason "<reason>"; history is retained.

Completion

A versioned plan that forge can execute and reckoning can audit, with no fabricated results.

After all required work and stage closures is recorded, use checklist done --run "$RUN". This archives the result without deleting its history; it does not authorise any external action.

Reference shelf

Open the technique relevant to the current step. These notes provide concrete methods and examples, not additional phases; this entrypoint defines the run's completion conditions.

  • Design informative comparisons within a real budget
  • Choose data and baselines for the stated population
  • Connect a chosen claim to planned evidence
  • Specify what will be measured and compared

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.